Memorise like a PRO

Channel
Wealthy Habits
@WealthyHabits
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,023subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001215886832 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WealthyHabits |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WealthyHabits |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 4,023 | +4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 4,019 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 4,018 | -9 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 01:55 | 4,027 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:45 | 4,025 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 4,031 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 4,030 | +3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 4,027 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 4,029 | +5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 4,024 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 4,028 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:19 | 4,034 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 4,034 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
68 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 38 | 55.9% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 23.5% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 7.35% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 7.35% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.47% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
I noticed something about environment. When you are surrounded by broke people, it starts to feel like everyone is struggling, like the economy is collapsing and no one has money, and even if you do, you start thinking you might lose it. When you are around entrepreneurs and people who are building things, it feels like money and opportunities are everywhere, even when you personally have less. Your environment shap…
❤8🥰5
✅ *Top 21 Lessons from “The Intelligent Investor” by Benjamin Graham* 1. Invest with a margin of safety to minimize risk. 2. Understand the difference between investing and speculating. 3. Focus on the intrinsic value of stocks, not market price fluctuations. 4. Buy stocks as if you’re buying a piece of a business. 5. Diversify your portfolio to protect against losses. 6. Be patient and disciplined—avoid reacting to…
❤12
⚡🍋 *5-Min Kitchen Bite* *Make Lemons Last Longer!* 🍋 Did you know? ✅ Wash and dry lemons completely. ✅ Store them in an airtight container or zip-lock bag in the refrigerator. ✅ This simple trick keeps them fresh for up to 3–4 weeks! 💡 *Bonus Tip:* Cut lemons only when needed to retain maximum juice and freshness. ✨ Small Kitchen Hacks • Big Difference
👍1
https://srikanthmatrubai.substack.com/p/the-wet-floor excellent article on simple mistakes and how to rectify the same
👍1
https://youtu.be/N6qAs14v7v4?si=Ev00OVm4T_hg0Gm9 PM Modi recently made a few national appeals to citizens. But hidden inside those simple appeals… are powerful investment lessons for our financial journey.
👍2💩2
Tax Tantri Tax Saving Tips, Tax Queries, Tax Solutions & Latest Tax news https://t.me/TaxTantri
❤1
One small habit can dramatically improve the way people perceive you during conversations. PAUSE. When you immediately reply to everything, people feel you are reacting. When you pause for a few seconds, people feel you are thinking. That small silence creates depth, maturity and weight in your words. In meetings, client discussions, family conversations or public speaking… people who speak slowly with calm pause…
❤8👍2🔥2👎1
#Life Pro Tip: If you suffer from anxiety, simply wash your face with cool water. An effect called the "diving reflex" will instantly lower your heart-rate substantially, helping you calm down.
👍3
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXR461pkzZc/?igsh=bGN1N3kxcDA4M2o5 Gold or Silver???
https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAFbeUyBHCnr4YRgmOg News, tips, guide on INSURANCE from Experts across India
NEVER SHAKE A HAND SITTING DOWN Always shake hands standing up - it's a sign of respect and confidence.
👍3🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WealthyHabits. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@CAPTURED_MOMENTES · 23,513
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 18 September 2026
@deepthoughts2 · 23,100
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 19 September 2026
@multibaggers_valuepicks · 40,896
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
@Targetkas20 · 35,198
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
@navachetana08 · 36,321
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 2 September 2026
@Governmentofkarnatakajobupdates · 22,906
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wealthy Habits” (@WealthyHabits), 4,023 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WealthyHabits.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.