24 measurements spanning 24 days, net -6,328. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,529–23,755 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Sept 2026, 01:08
16,478
-225
1 Sept 2026, 02:04
16,703
-294
30 Aug 2026, 23:16
16,997
-118
29 Aug 2026, 21:24
17,115
-494
29 Aug 2026, 00:13
17,609
-389
27 Aug 2026, 22:43
17,998
-202
26 Aug 2026, 23:44
18,200
-40
26 Aug 2026, 00:35
18,240
-250
25 Aug 2026, 03:43
18,490
-128
23 Aug 2026, 23:02
18,618
-485
22 Aug 2026, 03:46
19,103
-479
20 Aug 2026, 22:03
19,582
-163
19 Aug 2026, 20:17
19,745
-210
18 Aug 2026, 20:16
19,955
-443
17 Aug 2026, 17:28
20,398
-311
16 Aug 2026, 14:45
20,709
-549
14 Aug 2026, 23:14
21,258
-350
13 Aug 2026, 17:58
21,608
-340
12 Aug 2026, 18:37
21,948
-126
11 Aug 2026, 22:11
22,074
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 25 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.61%
avg views ÷ 16,478 subscribers
Avg views / post
430
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
24 (25 March 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
1,720
Reactions total
22
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 16:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
90
Videos
1
Links
108
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
4,525 reactions across 24 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
1,335
29.5%
👍
889
19.6%
🔥
640
14.1%
👌
570
12.6%
🐳
488
10.8%
❤🔥
347
7.67%
❤
233
5.15%
👏
18
0.398%
👎
3
0.066%
🕊
2
0.044%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,525 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 WGA Random Box Event Notice 🎁
We have identified a significant number of accounts suspected of abusing the previous WGA Random Box Event.
⚠️ To ensure fairness and protect legitimate participants, all XYZ tokens received by accounts suspected of abuse will be confiscated.
🔍 The WGA team is currently reviewing the relevant accounts and event participation records.
🚫 If an account is determined to have engaged in…
🚀 Supercharge your Web3 journey with WGA (Web3 Growth Agent)!
From community engagement to user retention and ecosystem scaling—our intelligent AI agents optimize every metric that matters. Stop guessing, start growing. 📈🔥
Where ancient philosophy meets hyper-connectivity. ⛩⚡️
WGA is building the bridge between the physical world and the digital future. Our DePIN core optimizes infrastructure while our AI unlocks decentralized growth.
The future is hybrid. Are you ready for the optimization?
#WGA #DePIN #AI #IoT #FutureTech #DecentralizedInfrastructure #CyberZen
🎉 WGA Reward Event is NOW LIVE! 🎉
Connect your wallet & link SNS to grab 1 Random Box! 🎁
💰 Each box contains 1.00 ~ 1,000.00 XYZ tokens! 💰
Don't miss this ecosystem welcome gift! 👋
Participate Here wga.xyz/reward #WGA #Web3 #Crypto #Airdrop #XYZ #Giveaway
🚀 WGA Reward Campaign is LIVE!
🎁 Connect your wallet & link your SNS account on the WGA Rewards page to receive Random Boxes today!
Each Random Box contains 1.00–1,000 XYZ tokens, and your accumulated rewards will be claimable soon.
✨ Don't miss your chance to get ahead before the claim period begins!
🔥 Bonus Rewards
✅ Connect your wallet
✅ Link your SNS account
✅ Daily check-in for more Random Boxe
🎁 WGA Reward Event is Live!
Connect your wallet at https://wga.xyz/reward and link your SNS account to receive 1 Random Box!
🎁Each Random Box contains 1.00 ~ 1,000.00 XYZ tokens.
⁉️How to participate:
Visit https://wga.xyz/reward
1️⃣Connect your wallet
2️⃣Link your SNS account and complete the quest.
3️⃣Collect XYZ from Random Boxes and claim your rewards.
Good luck, and welcome to the WGA ecosystem! 🚀
https://x.…
🚀 Big News!
WGA (Web3 Growth Agent) is officially listing on LBank! 🎉
📅 Trading Opens: July 13, 2026, 02:18 UTC
💰 Deposits Open: July 12, 2026, 02:18 UTC
🔓 Withdrawals Open: July 15, 2026, 02:18 UTC
WGA is building the next generation of AI-powered Web3 infrastructure, transforming user behavior into trusted, verifiable digital assets through Soft DePIN.
Join us as we take another major step forward! 🌍
📖 Whitepaper: …
🎁 WGA Reward Event is Live!
Connect your wallet at https://wga.xyz/reward and link your SNS account to receive 1 Random Box!
🎁Each Random Box contains 1.00 ~ 1,000.00 XYZ tokens.
⁉️How to participate:
Visit https://wga.xyz/reward
1️⃣Connect your wallet
2️⃣Link your SNS account and complete the quest.
3️⃣Collect XYZ from Random Boxes and claim your rewards.
Good luck, and welcome to the WGA ecosystem! 🚀
https://x.…
🗳 DAOs need more than token votes — they need verified voices.
WGA enables:
One person, one vote · provably
Reputation-weighted governance
Sybil-resistant proposals
Power to the real participants.
#DAOGovernance #QuadraticVoting
https://x.com/W3growthagent/status/2039900709655863599
🤝 WGA x Caviar: Partnership unlocked!
@shopcaviar curates exclusive, limited-release IP-branded merch at the intersection of lifestyle and Web3.
WGA brings verifiable user proofs to ensure real humans secure access to drops — fair, transparent, and bot-free. 🛡
#WGA #Caviar #Partnership #Web3Commerce
https://x.com/W3growthagent/status/2039550615135953377
🤖 AI alignment starts with data alignment.
If AI trains on noise, it amplifies noise.
If AI trains on verified behavior, it learns truth.
WGA cleans the data so AI can think clearly.
Clean data in. Smarter AI out.
#AIDataAlignment #CleanData
https://x.com/W3growthagent/status/2039538314210886075
Behavioral Verification in Airdrop Design
Airdrops have become one of the most widely used mechanisms for bootstrapping participation in Web3 ecosystems. By distributing tokens to early users, projects aim to reward contributors, expand community ownership, and accelerate network effects.
In theory, airdrops align incentives between protocols and participants. Early adopters receive economic upside for supporting a …
💯85👌69🔥49🐳41👍20❤🔥4❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @Web3GrowthAgent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,279,829 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Web3GrowthAgent named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@w3growthagent named in 3 posts, 9 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Web3GrowthAgent” (@Web3GrowthAgent), 16,478 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Web3GrowthAgent.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.