Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 苏州Spa

Channel

苏州Spa

@Wen12341234

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

273subscribers

+47 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003282425664
TypeChannel
Username@Wen12341234
Created9 November 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Wen12341234

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

22527324912 August 2026 — 226 subscribers13 August 2026 — 225 subscribers19 August 2026 — 227 subscribers26 August 2026 — 233 subscribers1 September 2026 — 238 subscribers9 September 2026 — 258 subscribers18 September 2026 — 273 subscribers12 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net +47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 218–280 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 06:57273+15
9 Sept 2026, 16:14258+20
1 Sept 2026, 07:18238+5
26 Aug 2026, 06:46233+6
19 Aug 2026, 23:33227+2
13 Aug 2026, 00:53225-1
12 Aug 2026, 05:01226first reading

Engagement

2 posts held, back to 9 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 9 November 2025 to 24 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Apr 2026, 10:45 UTC≈1,380 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔥苏州新区虎丘全裸口爆💞🔥 价格🔥 💰 499 💗年龄:18-30💗 💗服务到位💗颜值可选💗 🔥 环境高端 独立卫浴 🅿️免费停车(进店免费送饮品)‼️ 💋各种调情服务手法👄 💋莞式一套服务👄 👐👐服务流程:胸推,指划,鼻吸,过水,吸皮,全身漫游,臀推,舔蛋蛋,裸吹,深喉,唇舌毒龙,🉑69.制服诱惑,丝袜高跟,各种调情,各种配合 🉑摸🉑揉🉑亲‼️‼️ 👄最后口爆出货👄 [爱心]每日出勤8位+迷人少妇,邻家小妹,巨乳,兼职学妹,洋酒小姐姐,不定期更新 💞💞安全可靠 私密环境 放心游戏! 💯无套路、明码标价、不办卡、没有任何隐型消费! 🕰服务时间:50分钟🕰 (客服没回请及时致电)👇👇👇 咨询电话☎️: 13141813201 💗 💗微信:!Wen13141813201 💞TG 客服💁‍♀️ @Wenjing888888 💖课表群:htt

6

Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @Wen12341234. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“苏州Spa” (@Wen12341234), 273 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Wen12341234.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.