Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SIRD-MI

Channel

SIRD-MI

@Whg_Sird_mi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

556subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002233257328
TypeChannel
Username@Whg_Sird_mi
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Whg_Sird_mi

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

556579567.56 August 2026 — 579 subscribers6 August 2026 — 579 subscribers15 August 2026 — 577 subscribers24 August 2026 — 574 subscribers30 August 2026 — 566 subscribers9 September 2026 — 562 subscribers18 September 2026 — 556 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 43 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 553–582 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:40556-6
9 Sept 2026, 12:19562-4
30 Aug 2026, 20:04566-8
24 Aug 2026, 04:42574-3
15 Aug 2026, 19:28577-2
6 Aug 2026, 18:03579no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:16579first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 30 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

696 reactions across 14 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20529.5%
❤‍🔥13419.3%
💋689.77%
649.20%
🍓578.19%
custom 5249327175408042547497.04%
custom 5897962082866828478314.45%
👀284.02%
162.30%
💘121.72%
😁101.44%
😭71.01%
🤩40.575%
🌭30.431%
👻20.287%
😍20.287%
🙏20.287%
💔10.144%
🔥10.144%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 696 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 14 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Whg_Sird_mi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 March 2026 to 12 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 14:27 UTC251 views75 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вот моя часть без фильтров👀

💋401312💘7❤‍🔥3

12 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC177 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mineshieldat17Photo

🔤🔤🫠🍯🍯🍯🍯🍯🍯🍯🫠 — была ли та дверь выходом? куда ведёт следующая? близок ли конец... мш4 ❤ы тоже видели тот силуэт? или это кажется нам? ❤риглашаем вас вместе пройти эти коридоры и, если повезёт, добраться до выхода 🍯 ❤❤❤❤❤❤🍯 🫠Диамкей 🫠Жираф 🫠Ники 🫠Джаст 🫠Пугод 🫠Душенька и ОбсидианТайм 🫠Алфедов 🍯

13❤‍🔥52💋2🍓1👀1😁1

30 Jun 2026, 06:39 UTC346 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

135🍓4❤‍🔥3💋1😁1

30 Jun 2026, 06:39 UTC375 views67 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Всемм хево С меня сняли оковы,теперь я свободна

2819🍓10❤‍🔥5👀31💋1

12 May 2026, 03:45 UTC543 views65 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Не пугайтесь, новые подписчики, если вас удаляют из канала. Из-за накрутки ботов на мой тгк, мне приходится их удалять, А из-за лага в тг(наверн потому что часто удаляю)тг случайно удалил несколько новых ребят, вместо ботов, сори кого удалила

38👀127💋3🍓21❤‍🔥1💘1

14 Apr 2026, 08:14 UTC715 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Надеюсь вы не против если я немног порепощу друзяшек🤩

19😁8❤‍🔥3custom 58979620828668284783🍓2💋2🙏21

14 Apr 2026, 08:14 UTC691 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @trubakiwiPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

15💋642❤‍🔥1

14 Apr 2026, 07:56 UTC604 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @EMOvam5irePhoto

я всё ещё не понимаю как мне шейдить чтобы мне нравилось #алисавстранечудес #арты

custom 589796208286682847816❤‍🔥7💋411

12 Apr 2026, 13:48 UTC643 views84 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

С Пасхой всех!

37❤‍🔥20🍓155👀2💋21💘1

5 Apr 2026, 08:48 UTC608 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @EMOvam5irePhoto

перезалив потому что я тупая игра которая вызвала у меня три потока слёз, у которой даже нет контента надо исправить #easydeliveryco #скетчи

18🍓75💋3

2 Apr 2026, 07:51 UTC660 views54 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ЕСЛИ ЧТО ЭТО ПРИКОЛ НЕ ОТПИСЫВАЙТЕСЬ 😳 Крч не буде больше приколов на какие-нибудь праздники

custom 524932717540804254732🍓9631👀1💔1😍1

1 Apr 2026, 08:12 UTC718 views73 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Так как телеграм блокирует. Я приняла очень тяжелое решение,и буду постить только единственной соцсети.Национальном мессенджере MAX! Так что подписывайтесь теперь я только там 💬 МОЙ КАНАЛ

❤‍🔥34custom 524932717540804254717👀9😭72🍓21😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Whg_Sird_mi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SIRD-MI” (@Whg_Sird_mi), 556 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Whg_Sird_mi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.