Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for White Hats

Channel

White Hats

@WhiteHats17

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,145subscribers

+368 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001857355928
TypeChannel
Username@WhiteHats17
DescriptionWatch Trump and the White Hats put the broken pieces back together. #MAGA
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/WhiteHats17

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,7548,1457,949.56 August 2026 — 7,777 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,777 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,779 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,791 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,796 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,788 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,779 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,771 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,763 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,766 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,758 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,756 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,754 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,766 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,803 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,960 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,965 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,972 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,979 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,055 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,047 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,034 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,038 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,059 subscribers5 November 2026 — 8,145 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net +368. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,695–8,204 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 13:008,145+86
2 Nov 2026, 12:288,059+21
30 Oct 2026, 18:408,038+4
27 Oct 2026, 10:178,034-13
24 Oct 2026, 19:088,047-8
21 Oct 2026, 20:488,055+76
18 Oct 2026, 11:447,979+7
15 Oct 2026, 08:517,972+7
12 Oct 2026, 02:417,965+5
5 Oct 2026, 13:157,960+157
28 Sept 2026, 01:577,803+37
18 Sept 2026, 08:017,766+12
14 Sept 2026, 11:207,754-2
10 Sept 2026, 14:187,756-2
1 Sept 2026, 09:247,758-8
29 Aug 2026, 14:547,766+3
26 Aug 2026, 16:037,763-8
23 Aug 2026, 16:377,771-8
19 Aug 2026, 18:097,779-9
16 Aug 2026, 14:487,788first reading

Engagement

66 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.4%
avg views ÷ 8,145 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,570
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 66 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held66 (25 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total172,593
Reactions total5,192
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 12:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
706
Videos
562
Links
94

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
57m 34s
Average length
1m 51s

Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

9,237 reactions across 66 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,21134.8%
👍1,49916.2%
💯1,21213.1%
🔥8469.16%
🙏6737.29%
👏6517.05%
🫡2052.22%
🤣1791.94%
❤‍🔥1151.24%
🤬991.07%
💩971.05%
🤮730.79%
🎉620.671%
😈420.455%
⚡370.401%
🕊330.357%
💊300.325%
🤡240.26%
🥰230.249%
😴180.195%
18 further kinds1081.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,237 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (32.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 01:27 UTC≈3,300 views111 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

THEY CALL HIM THE HEBREW HAMMER! 🇺🇸 @WhiteHats17

❤57💯23🔥17🫡7🙏3😱2👍1🤣1

6 Nov 2026, 21:52 UTC764 views106 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

PATRIOTS IN CONTROL!!! JOIN & SHARE: ⬇️ https://t.me/MasterEzra

❤68🙏16💯12🫡5😴3👎1🤯1

6 Nov 2026, 20:49 UTC≈2,340 views130 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Stand. Fight. Defend the Republic 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 @WhiteHats17

🔥58❤37🫡10👍9🙏7👏5⚡2💯1

6 Nov 2026, 17:33 UTC746 views150 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @GeneralPatton17Photo

President Trump pretending the midterms were legitimate should make you happy. It means he’s done talking about it, and it’s time for justice to be served. 11.3 was the point of no return. The Democrats are about to experience the most epic rug pull of all time. Buckle up buttercups! FOLLOW: @GeneralPatton17

❤73👏29👍14🙏14🔥9🎉3💯3✍2

6 Nov 2026, 17:12 UTC≈2,190 views148 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

We are at the PRECIPICE. [SWAMP] FIGHTING BACK Remain CALM. We are here for a reason. Patriots are in control. Q We have not fought this hard and long to lose. We were told there’d be a scare event . Having our Country stolen from us by foreign adversaries qualifies. PATRIOTS ARE NOW IN CONTROL. Remain CALM. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 @WhiteHats17

👍65💯35❤16🙏15👏10🔥3🤝2👀1

5 Nov 2026, 19:03 UTC733 views242 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

How do you capture a very dangerous animal? Simple...lure them into a TRAP! Someone said this once: “THIS IS HOW WE SET THE TRAP: WE OPEN A DOOR, PRESENTING AN OPPORTUNITY THEY CANNOT RESIST. THEIR OWN GREED WILL COMPEL THEM TO WALK THROUGH, SEEKING TO TAKE CONTROL.” (And now, they are walking right into it.) THE HUNTERS HAVE NOW BECOME THE HUNTED. @PEPEPUNISHER

❤142👍44🙏21🔥13🫡9🥰6❤‍🔥4👎2

4 Nov 2026, 21:14 UTC≈1,020 views167 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @GeneralPatton17Photo

TRAP FOLLOW: @GeneralPatton17

❤94🫡32👍20🙏8🔥6💯4🤣2😐1

4 Nov 2026, 15:55 UTC≈7,250 views244 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯123❤66🫡23🙏18🥰5👍4🤪2❤‍🔥1

4 Nov 2026, 15:19 UTC≈1,060 views164 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

GAME ON! JOIN & SHARE: ⬇️ https://t.me/MasterEzra

💯79❤43👏18🙏6👍5🫡4🕊3😴3

4 Nov 2026, 04:04 UTC≈1,150 views217 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @GeneralPatton17Photo

We know the playbook. President Trump used the Save America Act to expose them all. He knew it wouldn’t pass. He knew exactly what was going to happen today. Do you think he didn’t prepare? This is the greatest military sting operation in history. Buckle up and grab some popcorn! FOLLOW: @GeneralPatton17

🙏103💯53❤23🔥15👍11💊7🕊3❤‍🔥1

3 Nov 2026, 20:57 UTC≈19,900 views233 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Don’t be angry about all of the cheating you are seeing today everywhere. Shown, not told. This is an operation to get most people on board with the next phase. JUSTICE IS COMING‼️🔥 @WhiteHats17

❤122👍49🙏38🔥8💯6🫡4🤣3🖕2

3 Nov 2026, 16:12 UTC≈8,280 views174 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

"WE HAVE TO VOTE." "IF OUR PEOPLE VOTE — WE WIN IN A LANDSLIDE." "I'm asking everybody, pretend I'm on the ballot! In a way, I AM. All the things that I've done, gets erased!" "They gotta get out." @WhiteHats17

❤99👍35💯17🕊10🙏9🔥3🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @WhiteHats17. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @WhiteHats17 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

19TH PRESIDENT
@RealTrump19 · 20,405
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 25 September 2026
General Patton 🪖
@GeneralPatton17 · 38,723
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 30 August 2026
JFK TV
@JFK_TV · 35,386
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 1 September 2026
General Patton
@General_PattonQ · 19,792
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 28 September 2026
Princess Diana 👒
@PrincessDiana_Q · 59,665
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 22 August 2026
John F. Kennedy Jr.
@JFK_Q17 · 103,777
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 August 2026
Trump Office
@DonaldTrumpOffice · 55,661
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 August 2026
MedBeds Technology
@MedBedsTechnologyNews · 91,180
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 19 August 2026
Qanon Fighters
@QanonFighters · 29,779
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 16 September 2026
Patrick Bouvier Kennedy
@PatrickKennedy777 · 47,333
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 26 August 2026
Intergalactic SpaceForce - Galactic Federation –Special Command
@SpaceForceGalacticFederation · 56,345
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 23 August 2026
QFS - BRICS - GESARA - CRYPTO - BLOCKCHAIN - FinancialMarkets - GeoPolitics
@GESARAandNESARA · 25,559
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 13 September 2026
Master C. Miller
@MasterCMiller · 26,398
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 September 2026
Michael Jackson
@M_JacksonQ · 69,151
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 20 August 2026
Ezra A. Cohen
@Ezra_Cohen_Private · 19,612
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 29 September 2026
Mel Gibson
@mel_gibsonchannel · 58,417
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 August 2026
رادیو ری استارت
@radiorestart · 23,453
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 September 2026
شب بخیر ایران
@semohos1 · 25,515
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
ری استارت
@semahos · 46,231
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
پستو نيوز Pasto News
@Pastonews · 99,055
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“White Hats” (@WhiteHats17), 8,145 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WhiteHats17.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.