Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Who Cares?

Channel

Who Cares?

@WhoCaresPm

Not marked by Telegram, checked 12 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,052subscribers

-1,377 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002214846727
TypeChannel
Username@WhoCaresPm
DescriptionWelcome to the official channel of “Who Cares?”
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/WhoCaresPm

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

17,05218,42917,740.511 August 2026 — 18,429 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,429 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,420 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,393 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,381 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18,364 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,334 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,323 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,305 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,289 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,283 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,259 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,233 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,203 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,182 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,166 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,160 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,148 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,129 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,103 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,081 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,063 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,047 subscribers3 September 2026 — 18,037 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,997 subscribers9 September 2026 — 17,941 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,887 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,843 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,830 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17,801 subscribers25 September 2026 — 17,669 subscribers4 October 2026 — 17,546 subscribers8 October 2026 — 17,477 subscribers13 October 2026 — 17,426 subscribers14 October 2026 — 17,396 subscribers15 October 2026 — 17,379 subscribers16 October 2026 — 17,355 subscribers17 October 2026 — 17,348 subscribers18 October 2026 — 17,333 subscribers19 October 2026 — 17,320 subscribers20 October 2026 — 17,301 subscribers22 October 2026 — 17,284 subscribers23 October 2026 — 17,268 subscribers24 October 2026 — 17,261 subscribers25 October 2026 — 17,240 subscribers26 October 2026 — 17,237 subscribers26 October 2026 — 17,225 subscribers28 October 2026 — 17,206 subscribers29 October 2026 — 17,179 subscribers30 October 2026 — 17,152 subscribers31 October 2026 — 17,141 subscribers1 November 2026 — 17,122 subscribers2 November 2026 — 17,115 subscribers3 November 2026 — 17,106 subscribers4 November 2026 — 17,097 subscribers5 November 2026 — 17,083 subscribers6 November 2026 — 17,062 subscribers7 November 2026 — 17,058 subscribers8 November 2026 — 17,052 subscribers11 August 20268 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 89 days, net -1,377. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,845–18,636 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 11:4817,052-6
7 Nov 2026, 06:0817,058-4
6 Nov 2026, 05:5817,062-21
5 Nov 2026, 01:4017,083-14
4 Nov 2026, 01:4817,097-9
3 Nov 2026, 03:1117,106-9
2 Nov 2026, 03:3717,115-7
1 Nov 2026, 00:5817,122-19
31 Oct 2026, 03:3817,141-11
30 Oct 2026, 06:4717,152-27
29 Oct 2026, 05:3917,179-27
28 Oct 2026, 00:3117,206-19
26 Oct 2026, 22:2717,225-12
26 Oct 2026, 01:5617,237-3
25 Oct 2026, 04:0617,240-21
24 Oct 2026, 04:1717,261-7
23 Oct 2026, 01:1717,268-16
22 Oct 2026, 00:1717,284-17
20 Oct 2026, 22:0617,301-19
19 Oct 2026, 18:2817,320first reading

Engagement

456 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.55%
avg views ÷ 17,052 subscribers
Avg views / post
435
100 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
100
of 456 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held456 (10 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total43,522
Reactions total1,168
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 16:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈12,700
Videos
≈8
Links
≈21

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

7,488 reactions across 454 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣4,59161.3%
❤1,67022.3%
😢5847.80%
😁2703.61%
👍2253.00%
👏1011.35%
🎉260.347%
🥰210.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 455 of the 456 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,488 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 456 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 100 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 14:35 UTC144 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Finland has once again been named the world’s happiest country in the 2026 World Happiness Report, securing the top spot for the ninth consecutive year. 🇫🇮 Strong social support, trust, personal freedom, and quality of life continue to make Finland a global example of well-being. 🌍

❤4

8 Nov 2026, 11:35 UTC256 views10 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

A man tried to escape from police, but his own dog led officers straight to his hiding place! 🐕🚔

🤣9👏1

8 Nov 2026, 09:35 UTC293 views8 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Six inmates had the perfect chance to escape, but they chose to save a life instead. ❤️

❤8

8 Nov 2026, 08:35 UTC298 views8 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

A high school student won the Homecoming King crown but chose to give it away in a heartwarming moment. ❤️

❤8

Showing the 12 most recent of 456 posts we hold for @WhoCaresPm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 05:58 UTCAnonymous Poll102 voters

Which one is impossible to hide?

  1. Jealousy21%
  2. Excitement43%
  3. Anger44%
  4. Crush13%

The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Aug 2026, 05:27 UTCAnonymous Poll91 voters

What would you rather have?

  1. Perfect memory30%
  2. Perfect sleep32%
  3. Perfect health57%
  4. Perfect luck46%

The shares total 165%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTCAnonymous Poll86 voters

Which habbiy is hardest to quit?

  1. Checking phone 📱42%
  2. Overthinking 😣53%
  3. Sleeping late 😴26%
  4. Procrastinating35%

The shares total 156%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTCAnonymous Poll99 voters

Pick your ideal evening:

  1. Chai + snacks34%
  2. Long drive35%
  3. Movie31%
  4. Friends35%

The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTCAnonymous Poll113 voters

Your Spider-Man?🕷️🕸️

  1. Andrew Garfield36%
  2. Tobey24%
  3. Tom Holland58%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 456 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

No One Cares
@noonecaresTG · 19,705
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 27 September 2026
Next Toppers Official
@Abhay_batch2024boards · 559,114
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Who Cares?” (@WhoCaresPm), 17,052 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WhoCaresPm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.