Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for William Makis MD

Channel

William Makis MD

@WilliamMakis

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,251subscribers

+41 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001844521931
TypeChannel
Username@WilliamMakis
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/WilliamMakis

Growth

4,2104,2514,230.57 August 2026 — 4,210 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,211 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,215 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,218 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,222 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,237 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,244 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,246 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,251 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 23 days, net +41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,204–4,257 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 13:554,251+5
27 Aug 2026, 10:074,246+2
24 Aug 2026, 07:274,244+7
20 Aug 2026, 22:244,237+15
17 Aug 2026, 13:174,222+4
14 Aug 2026, 02:054,218+3
10 Aug 2026, 18:014,215+4
8 Aug 2026, 00:234,211+1
7 Aug 2026, 04:474,210first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

218 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7835.8%
👏5424.8%
👍3516.1%
🙏2611.9%
💯125.50%
🔥83.67%
🤡31.38%
🤔20.917%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 18:36 UTC901 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

THEY TOLD YOU YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM WAS JUST WEAK. THEY LIED. A weak immune system is not a genetic flaw. It is a system that has been drained of its cellular energy by chronic, hidden inflammation. When your cellular voltage drops below 20mV, your white blood cells stop patrolling. Your body stops fighting off pathogens. You get sick, and you stay sick. You cannot fix a collapsed immune system with a vitamin pill.

👏113👍3🤡3🤔1

26 Jul 2026, 15:26 UTC937 views56 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Even cancer researchers need an occasional break to get some natural Vitamin D 😃 @WilliamMakis

👏2812👍11🙏5

26 Jul 2026, 15:25 UTC915 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

NEW ARTICLE: IVERMECTIN, MEBENDAZOLE and FENBENDAZOLE Testimonial - 67 year old Illinois woman with Stage 4 Ovarian Cancer reports after 6 months: Cancer Free!! So many Ovarian Cancer success stories! 😃 STORY: 67 year old Illinois woman with Stage 4 Ovarian Cancer (peritoneal carcinomatosis) In January 2026 she started: Ivermectin 1mg/kg/day Mebendazole 1500mg/day Fenbendazole 1000mg/day Chemo Results after 6 mo

22👏6

26 Jul 2026, 15:24 UTC800 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

NEW ARTICLE: IVERMECTIN and FENBENDAZOLE Testimonial - 66 year old Canadian man with New Stage 4 Prostate Cancer (Gleason 9) reports after 8 months: nodal metastases shrunk, PSA 42 to 0.2! Another incredible success story with the most aggressive Prostate Cancer type! 😃 STORY: 66 year old Canadian man with New Prostate Cancer In September 2025 he started: Ivermectin 1mg/kg/day Fenbendazole 1000mg/day (1776mg/day

14👏9

20 Jul 2026, 13:36 UTC≈1,180 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

If you think memory loss is just a normal part of aging...think again. Because new research from Harvard Medical School, there is a disturbing link between Alzheimer’s cases and a toxic mineral that’s hiding in plain sight… Over 70% of the U.S. population ingests this toxic mineral through common foods, drinks, and even products we put on our skin every day… And its devastating effects on our brain health are now

8🔥3🙏2

19 Jul 2026, 20:34 UTC≈1,090 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

BREAKING NEWS: BBC WALES INVESTIGATES asked me for an Interview about Ivermectin, Mebendazole and Fenbendazole in CANCER New York Times Mayo Clinic BBC Wales Investigates Do these sound like honest organizations that want to help cancer patients? And now, after 2 years of revolutionary Cancer Research work, now they come to me? 🤔 BBC Wales Investigates reaches out to me having done no investigating whatsoever.

👍14💯125🔥5

19 Jul 2026, 20:33 UTC911 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

BREAKING NEWS: IVERMECTIN, FENBENDAZOLE and MEBENDAZOLE Testimonial - 65 year old Illinois woman with Stage 4 Endometrial Cancer (post Moderna) failed Chemo - then did repurposed drugs only and tumors are shrinking! What do you do when Mayo Clinic and Northwestern Medicine fail? 🤔 You eliminate your cancer with repurposed drugs, of course! 😃 STORY: 65 year old Illinois woman with Stage 4 Endometrial Cancer (post M

🙏165👍2

19 Jul 2026, 20:32 UTC863 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

BREAKING NEWS: AI admits that alcohol is far more dangerous and toxic than IVERMECTIN!! That beer or glass of wine you're having, is doing far more damage to your liver than Ivermectin ever could 😃 So why are Oncologists LYING to their patients? 🤔 Because they can. There are no consequences. Why is there so much FRAUD in healthcare in the United States? Because there are no consequences. If you drink any alcohol

9👍5🙏3🤔1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @WilliamMakis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 428,156 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“William Makis MD” (@WilliamMakis), 4,251 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WilliamMakis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.