حادثه رانندگی برای استون کلد ⌯ ──────── ⌯ ·· #Pouria ❲ @WrestlingPars ❳
🔥15❤3🤣3💔1

Channel
@WrestlingPars
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,074subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001545891079 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WrestlingPars |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WrestlingPars |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 09:59 | 2,074 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 2,077 | -6 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 2,083 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 2,091 | no change |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 2,091 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
424 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 114 | 26.9% | |
| 🔥 | 102 | 24.1% | |
| 👍 | 58 | 13.7% | |
| 💩 | 44 | 10.4% | |
| 💔 | 42 | 9.91% | |
| 👎 | 30 | 7.08% | |
| 💋 | 20 | 4.72% | |
| 🤣 | 13 | 3.07% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.236% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 424 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
حادثه رانندگی برای استون کلد ⌯ ──────── ⌯ ·· #Pouria ❲ @WrestlingPars ❳
🔥15❤3🤣3💔1
سه سال پیش در چنین روزی ، بری وایت در سن ۳۶ سالگی درگذشت 🖤 ⌯ ──────── ⌯ ·· #Pouria ❲ @WrestlingPars ❳
💔36🤣2
کمپانی WWE نوامبر امسال رویداد کرون جول را در عربستان برگزار میکند ، و یک بار دیگر دو قهرمان اصلی کمربند ها که درحال حاضر رومن رینز و سی ام پانک هستند مقابل هم قرار میگیرند! ⌯ ──────── ⌯ ·· #Pouria ❲ @WrestlingPars ❳
👍11
کاملا واضح است وقتی کار رومن رینز با کمپانی به پایان برسد ، اوبا فمی جایگاه وی را خواهد گرفت " WON " ⌯ ──────── ⌯ ·· #Pouria ❲ @WrestlingPars ❳
👎29💩8👍5
در داخل WWE ، احساس عمیقی وجود دارد که براک لزنر باید به شکلی در رسلمنیا 43 حاضر شود. شاید در این ایونت براک مسابقهای ندهد اما باید نقشی را اجرا کند. یکی از جدیترین گزینه های که مطرح شده ، براک لزنر در رسلمنیا 43 به عنوان اصلیترین چهره هال آف فیمر معرفی شود فقط در صورتی که نتواند مسابقه بدهد. " WrestleVotes - Fightful ⌯ ──────── ⌯ ·· #Pouria ❲ @WrestlingPars ❳
👍17❤1
براک لزنر : امروز اینجا هستم تا به جهان بگویم ، من رسماً بازنشسته شدهام. از همگی شما شدیدا سپاسگزارم. ( قطعا یکی از بزرگترین های تاریخ ، شاید کمتر کسی فکر میکرد براک انقدر با اخلاق باشه ) ⌯ ──────── ⌯ ·· #Pouria ❲ @WrestlingPars ❳
❤45💔2👍1🤮1
🚨 رومن رینز : «فکر نمیکنم هیچوقت براک لزنر دیگری وجود داشته باشد. کاری که او توانست انجام دهد و میراثی که ساخت، واقعاً منحصربهفرد بود. اینکه از WWE خارج شود، به UFC برود و قهرمان سنگینوزن جهان شود. و بعد بتواند برگردد و هر دو دنیا را در بالاترین سطح تجربه کند؛ این همان اعتبار، توانایی ورزشی و واقعگراییای است که او از UFC به WWE و به رینگ ما آورد. او قطعاً یکی از بزرگترین کشتیگیران حرفهای تمام دوران است. و…
❤37
از کصشر بودن WWE به خاطر تغییراتی که دادن همینو بگم که PPV بعدی مانی این د بنک هستش و حدوداً ۶۸ روز دیگه برگزار میشه ، توی گذشته نهایتا با فاصله یک ماه از ppv قبلی برگزار میشد ⌯ ──────── ⌯ ·· #Pouria ❲ @WrestlingPars ❳
💩18👍2👎1
رومن رینز بعد از اتمام ایونت ⌯ ──────── ⌯ ·· #Pouria ❲ @WrestlingPars ❳
❤17💩7
هشدار اسپویل : رومن رینز با موفقیت از تایتلش دفاع کرد ⌯ ──────── ⌯ ·· #Pouria ❲ @WrestlingPars ❳
🔥30💔3
هشدار اسپویل : چد گیبل هم چمپ شد ⌯ ──────── ⌯ ·· #Pouria ❲ @WrestlingPars ❳
🔥21👍2❤1
توی این صحنه ، لنگ های بانو شارلوت اگه اشتباه نکنم به طرز عجیبی بالا رفت ⌯ ──────── ⌯ ·· #Pouria ❲ @WrestlingPars ❳
💋20🤣4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @WrestlingPars. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wrestling Pars” (@WrestlingPars), 2,074 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WrestlingPars.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.