QQ隔空验证码_2.0 下载链接 https://heikefx.lanzoub.com/izQ073sdlh4h
🔥2

Channel
@WuShenChina
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
21,671subscribers
-1,793 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002030125843 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WuShenChina |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WuShenChina |
Software piracy — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:22 | 21,671 | -54 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 21,725 | -8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 21,733 | -63 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 21,796 | -77 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 21,873 | -126 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 21,999 | -98 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 22,097 | -48 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:34 | 22,145 | -62 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:03 | 22,207 | -54 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:39 | 22,261 | -41 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:29 | 22,302 | -40 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 22,342 | -43 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 22,385 | -47 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 22,432 | -17 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 22,449 | -56 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 22,505 | -35 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 22,540 | -94 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 22,634 | -80 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 22,714 | -43 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:21 | 22,757 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 31 December 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
10 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 80.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
QQ隔空验证码_2.0 下载链接 https://heikefx.lanzoub.com/izQ073sdlh4h
🔥2
🖥新版QQ模拟器 🔗 下载链接点我 🔗 📎 #安卓 #破解 #实用软件
❤2
🖥照妖镜2.0 🔗 下载链接点我 🔗 📎 #安卓 #破解 #实用软件
❤2
无畏契约GO内部直装 支持最新版本持续稳定更新 下载链接 https://heikefx.lanzoub.com/b00zyi8fcj
❤3
王者洛月内部直装 内部稳定版 下载链接 https://heikefx.lanzoub.com/b00zyo3wxi
❤1
使命遥遥领先内部定制直装 支持新版本稳定中 下载链接 https://heikefx.lanzoub.com/b00zyo3x2d
星仔速刷体质定制版 支持最新版本持续稳定更新 下载链接 https://heikefx.lanzoub.com/b00zyo3x3e
LINK Pro 内部定制直装.apk 云更新防封 稳定奔放 每日反馈99+ 下载链接 https://heikefx.lanzoub.com/b00zynihgf
频道 pinned Deleted message
Channel name was changed to «秋月出品»
频道 pinned Deleted message
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @WuShenChina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“频道” (@WuShenChina), 21,671 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WuShenChina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.