Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дядя Валя Люкс

Channel

Дядя Валя Люкс

@WylsaRaw

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

227,340subscribers

-3,224 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002683691746
TypeChannel
Username@WylsaRaw
DescriptionРКН: № 6170274735 Связь: [email protected], конкурсы: [email protected]
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/WylsaRaw

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

227,340230,564228,9525 August 2026 — 230,564 subscribers6 August 2026 — 230,564 subscribers6 August 2026 — 230,464 subscribers7 August 2026 — 230,399 subscribers8 August 2026 — 230,266 subscribers10 August 2026 — 230,140 subscribers11 August 2026 — 230,029 subscribers12 August 2026 — 229,910 subscribers12 August 2026 — 229,806 subscribers14 August 2026 — 229,665 subscribers16 August 2026 — 229,487 subscribers17 August 2026 — 229,369 subscribers18 August 2026 — 229,269 subscribers19 August 2026 — 229,155 subscribers20 August 2026 — 229,048 subscribers21 August 2026 — 228,971 subscribers23 August 2026 — 228,848 subscribers25 August 2026 — 228,699 subscribers26 August 2026 — 228,612 subscribers27 August 2026 — 228,510 subscribers27 August 2026 — 228,385 subscribers29 August 2026 — 228,282 subscribers30 August 2026 — 228,220 subscribers31 August 2026 — 228,170 subscribers1 September 2026 — 228,090 subscribers2 September 2026 — 227,977 subscribers3 September 2026 — 227,860 subscribers5 September 2026 — 227,707 subscribers8 September 2026 — 227,340 subscribers5 August 20268 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 34 days, net -3,224. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 226,856–231,048 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 15:36227,340-367
5 Sept 2026, 06:00227,707-153
3 Sept 2026, 09:56227,860-117
2 Sept 2026, 00:54227,977-113
1 Sept 2026, 03:14228,090-80
31 Aug 2026, 02:44228,170-50
30 Aug 2026, 03:34228,220-62
29 Aug 2026, 00:16228,282-103
27 Aug 2026, 23:23228,385-125
27 Aug 2026, 02:28228,510-102
26 Aug 2026, 03:28228,612-87
25 Aug 2026, 01:32228,699-149
23 Aug 2026, 15:55228,848-123
21 Aug 2026, 23:58228,971-77
20 Aug 2026, 18:53229,048-107
19 Aug 2026, 16:02229,155-114
18 Aug 2026, 14:24229,269-100
17 Aug 2026, 14:07229,369-118
16 Aug 2026, 04:04229,487-178
14 Aug 2026, 11:29229,665first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.5%
avg views ÷ 227,340 subscribers
Avg views / post
53,400
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held46 (23 July 20268 September 2026)
Views total1,387,100
Reactions total13,888
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Sept 2026, 15:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
764
Videos
222
Links
148

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
15m 25s
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

23,890 reactions across 45 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6,33926.5%
👍4,07817.1%
🔥2,94812.3%
🤣2,93212.3%
😁2,41010.1%
🤡1,3305.57%
💩1,0774.51%
❤‍🔥7983.34%
💊2591.08%
💯2511.05%
👎1850.774%
🤮1840.77%
🙈1530.64%
👌1520.636%
😱1360.569%
🤔610.255%
510.213%
🤪490.205%
🏆480.201%
👏450.188%
34 further kinds4041.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,520 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
155
across the posts below
Posts paid on
21
of 46 we hold a reading for · 46%
Most on one post
60
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @WylsaRaw. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 46 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 8 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Sept 2026, 19:10 UTC≈22,000 views323 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

В Mafia ремейке особенно нейронка мощно делает. В катсценах не прям один в один потому что я сидел клацал. Скриншот не передает. Но я за годы прям под впечатлением.

195🔥83👍37👎3😁2😢2🤯1

8 Sept 2026, 16:23 UTC≈23,100 views279 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

148🔥71👍29❤‍🔥23🤩8

8 Sept 2026, 15:28 UTC≈24,100 views268 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Сижу разбираюсь с DLSS5. Ну что я хочу вам сказать, назад дороги нет! Это еще через костыли прикрученная хреновая версия.

👍175🔥48🤯1913👎5❤‍🔥4💯4

8 Sept 2026, 09:27 UTC≈28,100 views331 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Приколите, в ChatGPT просто пишешь /proshot и нейронка сама себе делает промт для лютой обработки фото. Было-стало 👌 Ток зачем-то номер поменяла, ну не без нейродичи никуда. 🤣

👍236😁5825💩8🔥3🗿1

7 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC≈29,600 views526 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

Ахаха, это зубная щётка от Dyson.

🔥336😱79❤‍🔥31🤣31👍1714😁8🤯6

6 Sept 2026, 19:26 UTC≈34,400 views335 reactions1 Starread 8 September 2026
Video

Флик каких-то монстров собрал. Но посмотрим как в ЛЧ в этом году будет.

241👍65👎18🏆11

5 Sept 2026, 11:50 UTC≈36,900 views618 reactions1 Starread 8 September 2026
Video

Вот так всегда, мужик просто хочет почилилить в свой выходной, а женщине неймется. 😅😅

286😁249🤣44👍10🤡10💯9❤‍🔥4💩3

2 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTC≈48,700 views319 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

162😱57👍48🤮15🥴14🙈9💊7💩5

1 Sept 2026, 06:34 UTC≈50,400 views863 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Video

Не, ну вы видели, что творит молодой? А когда покупали никто не понимал - нафига?

❤‍🔥485🔥216👍9019🤡14😁13💅7😴7

31 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈106,000 views573 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Video

Сижу, делаю нейрослопы под видео о последнем дне Тима Кука в Apple. И чот так тоскливо стало. Хороший был мужик, спасибо за 15 лет, легенда! Видео скоро на всех каналах!

390😁57👍43❤‍🔥33🤮19😭16💩8🤝3

31 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC≈108,000 views461 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Video

А вот Geely (Geome) Galaxy Panda Mini. В Китае стоит 500 тыс рублей. Хочу такую по Москве флексить в поисках 95 бензина. Может есть у кого в Москве, я бы заценил!

267😁106👍46🔥28💩8🥰6

28 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈53,700 views929 reactions1 Starread 8 September 2026
Video

Когда в 40 лет решил заняться спортом. 🤗

😁634🤣18272💯15👍8😢8👾7🍌2

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @WylsaRaw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дядя Валя Люкс” (@WylsaRaw), 227,340 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WylsaRaw.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.