Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 合肥交流技师频道

Channel

合肥交流技师频道

@XHNB88766

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

7,221subscribers

+2,445 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003965690016
TypeChannel
Username@XHNB88766
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 2 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/XHNB88766

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,7767,2215,998.57 August 2026 — 4,776 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,780 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,920 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,013 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,123 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,281 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,518 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,761 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,965 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,162 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,172 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,502 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,858 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,221 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net +2,445. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,409–7,588 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 07:157,221+363
13 Sept 2026, 11:176,858+356
9 Sept 2026, 04:206,502+330
4 Sept 2026, 06:426,172+10
31 Aug 2026, 09:256,162+197
28 Aug 2026, 01:375,965+204
25 Aug 2026, 12:095,761+243
22 Aug 2026, 04:475,518+237
19 Aug 2026, 07:265,281+158
16 Aug 2026, 06:465,123+110
13 Aug 2026, 00:385,013+93
9 Aug 2026, 21:134,920+140
7 Aug 2026, 06:104,780+4
7 Aug 2026, 04:164,776first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 30 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC253 viewsread 12 August 2026

00号好评 人很好很温柔 服务体验A+ 手软腿长含情脉脉

11 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC389 viewsread 12 August 2026

00号好评,皮肤光滑,人照一致服务态度也很好,结束了附送按摩,找00有惊喜

10 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC672 viewsread 12 August 2026

88号服务好,又温柔又细心又体贴,体验很好,放得开

10 Aug 2026, 04:42 UTC670 viewsread 12 August 2026

77号 小姐姐服务很好 御姐型 人小小个非常温柔

9 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC733 viewsread 12 August 2026

看到兄弟们都推荐88就找客服联系留了空位,结果不出所料尺度和服务都很在线,确实是店内天花板。店内环境也可以,小哥们服务也比较热情,如果有来的第一次体验强推88啊!

8 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC968 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

兄弟们又给你们挖了一位05年嫩妹玩的开、情绪价值拉满、好盘

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @XHNB88766. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@XHNB88766 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“合肥交流技师频道” (@XHNB88766), 7,221 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XHNB88766.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.