卡网单范围新双子弹模式 效果自行尝试 本人推荐小子弹 不容易隔离二维码

Channel
XM无限授权
@XMSJHNB123
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
3,726subscribers
-6,579 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002703215129 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @XMSJHNB123 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/XMSJHNB123 |
Topic
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:45 | 3,726 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:06 | 3,731 | -8 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:44 | 3,739 | -152 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:06 | 3,891 | -2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:37 | 3,893 | -104 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:50 | 3,997 | -3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:46 | 4,000 | -176 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:00 | 4,176 | -155 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 12:30 | 4,331 | -76 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 23:55 | 4,407 | -29 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:18 | 4,436 | -55 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 4,491 | -84 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 4,575 | -59 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 4,634 | -227 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 4,861 | -465 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:49 | 5,326 | -579 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 5,905 | -1,237 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 7,142 | -2,495 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 9,637 | -45 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 9,682 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 20s
- Average length
- 20s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔥Start-和平范围 ✅裸奔全身位范围 ✅此版本无视高风险 ✅自定义大子弹和小子弹 ✅稳定奔放无任何配料表 ⭐引擎普通版也可以提卡 🔗 对引擎项目进行提卡 🔔 点我进入网盘下载 🐱官方频道点我加入 🥰 反馈/售后联系 @vip_sgnb
Photo, posted without a caption
置顶提卡:https://t.me/XMSJHNB123/60
和平裸奔范围
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
项目依旧稳定
🔗 对引擎项目进行提卡 🔔 点我进入网盘下载 🐱官方频道点我加入
👍3
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @XMSJHNB123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @XMSJHNB123 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 12 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 15 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 4 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@sdjyyds666 · 7,8056 posts牢大优质资源官方频道🇨🇳
@ldzynb666 · 1,3105 posts残念改文件副频『主频道看简介』
@xbnb6661 · 8,2975 posts八零の窝(冲2K)
@AHIMblnb · 1,6722 posts冷淡魔术快斗官方
@LDGWJ · 12,0312 postsDoro Kernel [注意频道置顶]
@vip_doro · 21,4922 postsDoro kernel[看频道置顶消息]
@Doro789 · 4,9491 postAS Game 官方频道 🇨🇳
@DSCHEAT8 · 14,6731 post公益资源分享频道🇨🇳
@SNGF666888 · 14,5081 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“XM无限授权” (@XMSJHNB123), 3,726 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XMSJHNB123.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.