Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NVA | Mossad

Channel

NVA | Mossad

@XNVAht

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

34,139subscribers

+20,145 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002996994944
TypeChannel
Username@XNVAht
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/XNVAht

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,90236,90825,4057 August 2026 — 13,994 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,994 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,902 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,268 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,496 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,034 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,744 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,340 subscribers15 August 2026 — 19,650 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,971 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,679 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,473 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,325 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,225 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,120 subscribers23 August 2026 — 21,263 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,926 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,667 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,331 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,671 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25,407 subscribers30 August 2026 — 27,060 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,283 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,628 subscribers2 September 2026 — 25,266 subscribers3 September 2026 — 24,856 subscribers6 September 2026 — 31,335 subscribers9 September 2026 — 31,732 subscribers11 September 2026 — 32,184 subscribers13 September 2026 — 36,908 subscribers15 September 2026 — 35,798 subscribers17 September 2026 — 34,139 subscribers34,1397 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 40 days, net +20,145. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,451–40,359 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 04:3934,139-1,659
15 Sept 2026, 07:4035,798-1,110
13 Sept 2026, 17:1636,908+4,724
11 Sept 2026, 22:0032,184+452
9 Sept 2026, 10:4031,732+397
6 Sept 2026, 03:0231,335+6,479
3 Sept 2026, 19:1824,856-410
2 Sept 2026, 11:0425,266-362
1 Sept 2026, 10:1925,628-655
31 Aug 2026, 07:3626,283-777
30 Aug 2026, 05:1327,060+1,653
29 Aug 2026, 04:3425,407+1,736
28 Aug 2026, 06:4623,671+1,340
27 Aug 2026, 07:2422,331+1,664
26 Aug 2026, 04:4320,667-259
25 Aug 2026, 03:5420,926-337
23 Aug 2026, 23:2321,263-857
22 Aug 2026, 03:3722,120-1,105
20 Aug 2026, 22:0623,225+4,900
19 Aug 2026, 20:3418,325first reading

Engagement

113 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 113 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 51s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,737 reactions across 108 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52673569370155556471,71729.9%
❤1,52126.5%
👍58210.1%
👻4577.97%
custom 58661394804648270273636.33%
💯2173.78%
❤‍🔥1893.29%
🕊1622.82%
🔥1342.34%
🙈1192.07%
💘731.27%
🐳400.697%
👾380.662%
👌370.645%
💋340.593%
🍓260.453%
custom 5827776892706496137250.436%
😘30.052%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 108 of the 113 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,737 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 113 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
43
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 113 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @XNVAht. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 113 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC696 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://t.me/Wnatde/5 ری اکشن زدن فراموش نشه

💯20❤1👻1

Signed NVA

11 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC697 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

شبتون بخیر خوب‌ بخوابید

custom 526735693701555564729❤‍🔥4👻3💋2🕊1

Signed NVA

11 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC723 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

اقا کیان خودم‌جواب سوالتو میدم.. ادمیزاد اینطوریه که برای دیگران تا وقتی که زندس مهمه وقتی که مرد برای هیچکی اهمیتی نداره اینو همیشه بدون اخرش فقط خودتیو خودت به هیچکی دل خوش نکن

💯21❤3custom 52673569370155556473👻2

Signed NVA

11 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC968 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

عاشق چنین محتوا هاییم چنین ویدیو عکسایی دارید بدید دایرکت کانال..

custom 526735693701555564721❤3👻1

Signed NVA

11 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC266 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

عا راستی حواسم نبود

🐳6👻2👾1😘1

Signed .𝐑.𝐈.𝐏

11 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC329 views27 reactionsread 11 August 2026

گوزو‌اون‌موقع تو ۶ ۷ سالت بوده😂

👻21🕊3🐳2👾1

Signed NVA

11 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC369 views26 reactionsread 11 August 2026

داش یادته اومدم ملاقاتی ( کس میگم اگه میرفتم منم میگرفتن میکردن به دلیل رفیق بودن با نوا )

💘20👻4🐳2

Signed .𝐑.𝐈.𝐏

11 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC539 views25 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ولی خوب چون رضایت بود روش بین ۳ تا ۱۰ سال حبس به حساب میومد که من همون ۳ سال شد

custom 526735693701555564724💋1

Signed NVA

11 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC555 views25 reactionsread 11 August 2026

اره اما من محکوم به قصاص بودم

custom 526735693701555564722🐳1👾1💋1

Signed NVA

11 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC577 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

عمو زندانی های سیاسی فقط‌شکنجه میشن؟؟

👾6❤‍🔥2

Signed NVA

11 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC600 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026

به ما که خوشگذشت یروز مثلا کباب میدادن اونروز بهشت بود فرداش نون پنیر میخوردیم لذت میبردیم😂

🕊10custom 52673569370155556473🐳1👾1

Signed NVA

11 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC613 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

اضلا بشدت عجیب من ۲ سال چندماهی بودم عادل آباد تازه چند ماهشم انفرادی بودم

👻6❤‍🔥1👌1💋1

Signed NVA

Showing the 12 most recent of 113 posts we hold for @XNVAht. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTCAnonymous Poll385 voters

روبلاکس دارید؟

  1. نه70%
  2. اره24%
  3. نصب میکنم12%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 113 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NVA | Mossad” (@XNVAht), 34,139 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XNVAht.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.