Продается канал (+чат), цена договорная, пишите предложения: @FunCrit
🗿3

Channel
@XRP_Puls
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
2,621subscribers
-139 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002449327898 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @XRP_Puls |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/XRP_Puls |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 2,621 | -16 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 2,637 | -14 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 2,651 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:53 | 2,665 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 2,677 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 2,685 | -14 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 2,699 | -15 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 2,714 | -9 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 2,723 | -13 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 2,736 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 2,743 | -18 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 2,761 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 2,760 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
287 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 93 | 32.4% | |
| 🔥 | 74 | 25.8% | |
| custom 5445284980978621387 | 23 | 8.01% | |
| 🐳 | 15 | 5.23% | |
| custom 5792172730514151247 | 14 | 4.88% | |
| custom 6051146553949691134 | 14 | 4.88% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 4.53% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 3.14% | |
| custom 5791935644024445523 | 8 | 2.79% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 2.09% | |
| custom 5983378850556418645 | 5 | 1.74% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 1.39% | |
| 🗿 | 3 | 1.05% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.05% | |
| custom 5983226280433163577 | 2 | 0.697% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.348% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 287 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @XRP_Puls. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Продается канал (+чат), цена договорная, пишите предложения: @FunCrit
🗿3
Соотношение предложения XRP на биржах составляет 0,03, на биржах практически не осталось #XRP. NVT упал на -23,73%... это означает, что сетевая активность фактически растет относительно оценки. Это противоположно тому, чего хотят медведи: меньшее предложение на биржах + улучшение полезности = тихая подготовка к росту.🔥 🌟 Zorbi {X} | 🤩 Heroes-exchange
custom 605114655394969113414🔥6👍3❤2🙏2
Последние Новости: Paxos стала первой компанией, использующей технологию блокчейн и зарегистрированной в SEC в качестве клирингового агентства, спустя 7 лет после начала сотрудничества с регулятором. 🌟 Zorbi {X} | 🤩 Heroes-exchange
👍12custom 57921727305141512474⚡2
🔥Срочная новость: CME Group запускает сегодня круглосуточную торговлю криптовалютами. Начиная с 29 мая в 16:00 по центральному времени, институциональные инвесторы смогут круглосуточно торговать фьючерсами на BTC, ETH, SOL, #XRP, ADA, LINK, XLM, AVAX и SUI. 🌟 Zorbi {X} | 🤩 Heroes-exchange
🔥11👍4👏2custom 57921727305141512471
В совершенно новом гиперликвидном кошельке только что поступили средства и открыта ПЕРВАЯ в истории сделка по #XRP: 👀 810 040 XRP в длинной позиции по $1,3348, номинальная стоимость $1,08 млн, кредитное плечо 20x. Что он знает такого, чего не знаем мы? 🌟 Zorbi {X} | 🤩 Heroes-exchange
🐳9👍5custom 57921727305141512473🕊1
Сейчас над #XRP находится магнит для ликвидации активов на сумму 2,26 миллиарда долларов. 👀 Цена всю неделю неуклонно снижалась с 1,48 до 1,30 долларов, но желтая полоса между 1,34 и 1,40 долларами никуда не денется, когда цена преодолеет этот уровень, это произойдет немедленным движением. 🌟 Zorbi {X} | 🤩 Heroes-exchange
🔥9custom 59833788505564186455👍2custom 57921727305141512472
Токенизированные RWA в экосистеме #XRP растут более чем в два раза быстрее, чем на Ethereum в 2026 году. С начала года объём вырос с $227 млн до $404 млн — это +78%. Для сравнения, Ethereum за тот же период показывает рост около +35%. При этом в начале года у #XRP была самая маленькая база среди крупных блокчейнов, но даже с этого уровня сеть показывает один из самых высоких темпов роста на рынке. XRP уже не догоня…
custom 544528498097862138713👍6🔥1
VanEck включил #XRPL в число ведущих корпоративных блокчейнов, оценив экосистему в $88 млрд активов. XRPL уже фигурирует в сегментах платежей, расчетов и секьюритизации наряду с крупнейшими финансовыми инфраструктурами мира. Даже Kinexys от JPMorgan упоминается как конкурент в тех же направлениях, а интеграция XRPL с DTCC через Securency уже задокументирована. В долгосрочной перспективе побеждает не самый громкий н…
👍7🔥7⚡2custom 54452849809786213871
Соучредитель Binance И Хэ стала первой женщиной-руководителем, вышедшей из криптоиндустрии, которая вошла в глобальный список самых влиятельных женщин по версии журнала Fortune. 🌟 Zorbi {X} | 🤩 Heroes-exchange
👍6🔥5🐳2custom 59832262804331635772
📊 #XRP Обновление данных по 100 крупнейшим активам за день – 27 мая 2026 г. 🔥 Всего сожжено: более 13,9 млн #XRP 🌐 Общий объем отслеживаемого предложения: 25,46 млрд #XRP 🪙 Заметные ежедневные движения кошельков: 🟢 rDxJNbV23... +1,27 млн #XRP → 1,493 млрд XRP 🟢 rKNwXQh9G... +1,06 млн #XRP → 329,93 млн XRP 🟢 rhWt2bhRq... +1,00 млн #XRP → 20,00 млн XRP 🔴 rP4X2hTa7... -3,50 млн #XRP → 2,84 млн XRP 🔴 rPyCQm8E5... -1,44…
👍6🐳4🔥4custom 57921727305141512471
Слабость по #XRP начинает проявляться. ⌛️ После паузы и наблюдения за тем, что происходит на рынке, мы вернулись в строй. Сейчас становится очевидно, что зона $1,30–$1,20 по-прежнему остается ключевой многомесячной поддержкой. Если рынок рассчитывает на продолжение этого контртрендового ралли с целями в районе $1,80 — реакция от текущих уровней должна последовать уже в ближайшее время. Потеря поддержки $1,20 открое…
👍6👏4💯3🔥2
Ripple 🤝является не только членом рабочей группы BIS по расширению совместимости платежей, но и ЕДИНСТВЕННОЙ блокчейн-платформой, которая участвует в разработке новых стандартов обмена сообщениями (ISO20022), интеграции API и быстрых трансграничных расчетов. #XRP 🌟 Zorbi {X} | 🤩 Heroes-exchange
🔥15👍8custom 54452849809786213874
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @XRP_Puls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“XRP Pulse” (@XRP_Puls), 2,621 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XRP_Puls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.