Channel
@Xiaoannibbb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,196subscribers
+82 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004238744367 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Xiaoannibbb |
| Created | Between 1 May 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Xiaoannibbb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 1,196 | +82 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 1,114 | no change |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:47 | 1,114 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 September 2026 – 14 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,961 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Sept 2026, 02:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
半岛嫩妹会报告模板： https://t.me/hangzhoubandao 【优势】 【不足】 【妹子花名】：#小安妮 【联系方式】：@annibianjiaqi 【妹子年龄】：24左右 【验证留名】：大力夯 【验证时间】：9月13日 【大概位置】：拱墅 【修车水费】：工兵 【高端服务】：有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✓ ② 69舔逼 有，没要 ③ 情绪价值 满分 ④ 毒龙 ✓ 【人照相似】：人照相似程度，颜值基本一致，关掉美颜就差不多了 【身高身材】：身高165出头，长腿，纹身大腿上有一块，皮肤光滑 【凶器罩杯】：胸型b+，乳头浅褐色小，整体手感不错 【湿度紧度】：比比户型没注意颜色，水多湿润，周围毛量正常 【环境细节】：交通出入方便，房间整洁 【个人卫生】：没抽烟，有，漱口水没牙刷有浴巾，事前事后有清洗 【时间管理】：开课是准时，排课是宽松，课时是做完 【服务点评】：服务是到位，无少…
❤2
我在杭州御女阁免费上榜啦，群内氛围轻松，不强制做活动，永久上榜！ 👑👑认准Telegram官方认证防伪标志 👑 超多好看的小姐姐都在这里上榜！💖💖💖 https://t.me/hangzhou_777
现在有位置 可以约哦😘
半岛嫩妹会报告模板： https://telegram.me/hangzhoubandao 【优势】导师级别，夯 【不足】暂未发现不足，非说的话就是毛偏硬，应该之前刮多了，希望继续刮 【妹子花名】：#小安妮 【联系方式】：@annibianjiaqi 【妹子年龄】：26 【验证留名】：士大夫士大夫 【验证时间】：9月 【大概位置】：半山附近 【修车水费】：900p 【高端服务】：有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 69舔逼 ✅ ③ 情绪价值 ✅ ④ 毒龙 ✅ 【人照相似】：人照合一可以给到9，小眼镜一戴这不就幻想中的总裁秘书嘛！ 【身高身材】：身高1.6+ 标准身材修长 前凸后翘蚂蚁腰，屁股不大 但非常滑嫩挺翘，适合后入猛怼，腿部有小面积纹身 【凶器罩杯】：标准胸型，标准乳头，是我看过观感最佳的，应该有点科技，但完全摸不出来，应该很贵的那种 【湿度紧度】：比比户型小蝴蝶，毛量中等，就是偏硬 【…
❤2
💋💋💋💋
还有空位，可口爆，可毒龙哦，宝宝们😘
重要的事说三遍
很多宝宝问我是不是只有92/95的服务，我想说你们都误解了，我的意思是服务很好，结合了92/95/98，简单的说，就是保证每位宝宝都很满意！
很多宝宝问我是不是只有92/95的服务，我想说你们都误解了，我的意思是服务很好，结合了92/95/98，简单的说，就是保证每位宝宝都很满意！
很多宝宝问我是不是只有92/95的服务，我想说你们都误解了，我的意思是服务很好，结合了92/95/98，简单的说，就是保证每位宝宝都很满意！
杭州夜色🌹福利群，白嫖，半价，现金抽不停！速进群！ ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.me/hero5201
现在可以约，宝子们
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Xiaoannibbb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小安妮杭州宝宝团” (@Xiaoannibbb), 1,196 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Xiaoannibbb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.