https://t.me/tdbhyfy 🔥深圳出击风向标 👀兄弟交流根据地,群内互通圈内动态,实时同步最新出击信息。 🫂志同道合的兄弟欢迎加入,一起交流避坑经验、交换一线情报。
❤1

Channel
@Xioauusl
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
343subscribers
+319 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004398374915 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Xioauusl |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Xioauusl |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 343 | no change |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 343 | +50 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 293 | +55 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 238 | +211 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 27 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 24 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 September 2026 – 17 September 2026) |
| Views total | 8,993 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 21:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/tdbhyfy 🔥深圳出击风向标 👀兄弟交流根据地,群内互通圈内动态,实时同步最新出击信息。 🫂志同道合的兄弟欢迎加入,一起交流避坑经验、交换一线情报。
❤1
身体不舒服,回去一下,下个月再开~
周末愉快~乖乖们💋
小玉空间 pinned Deleted message
上班了,宝宝们
❤1
【工兵报告】 https://t.me/szdfw 【老师艺名】小玉 【联系方式】@Xiaoyu2590 【所在位置】龙华清湖 【验证留名】harsanmer hasanmer 【验证时间】9.9 【修车费用】800 【颜值身材】人照9分,细支硕果,🐻大 【服务内容】xcz 【服务态度】8分,嫩妹全靠自己开发 【优点缺点】身材好,嫩妹,情绪价值没有 【推荐程度】9分,这个价位算不错了 【体验细节】跟老师约课挺顺利的,见到老师的第一眼很惊艳啊,照片拍的不太行,但是本人很好看,属于是穿衣显瘦脱衣有肉的类型,脱下衣服的时候,两个大白兔就跳了出来,交费洗澡,简单洗完以后迫不及待的上了床,服务过程不多,老师口的还行没有齿感,但是也不太愿意口太久,干脆带套上马吧,老师除了后入不太接受以外,其他姿势没啥问题,紧致,做起来感觉还不错,缺点就是反馈不太多,可能有点疲惫了吧,几个姿势之后顺利出货,洗澡走人。 ♥️温馨提示: 以上仅代表个人体验,报…
【极乐报告】 【极乐导航】:@jlmvip 【评价时间】:2026-09-09 【老师艺名】:小玉 【老师飞机】:@Xiaoyu2590 【学生昵称】:hasanmerhasanmer 【学生飞机】:@harm1235 【人照评分】:9 【颜值评分】:9 【身材评分】:10 【服务评分】:8 【态度评分】:8 【环境评分】:8 【综合评分】:8.67 【过程描述】:约上小玉也是不容易,前面一天由于人不舒服所以一直没约到。第二天顺利赴约,小姐姐科室在酒店,进出还挺方便,除了位置有点偏僻,见面小姐姐属实让人有点惊艳,人照基本一致,妥妥漂亮小嫩妹,进门的时候正在打游戏,也是挺随意的。妹妹说刚来深圳时间不长,身上没啥班味,都是青春气息。等妹妹游戏结束一起去洗澡,一脱衣服🐻前的大白兔直接跳了出来,妥妥穿衣显瘦脱衣有肉,也是属于细支结硕果了,顿时感觉来对了,服务过程就不多写了,简单xcz,会的不多,给的情绪价值比较少,适合喜欢嫩妹的兄弟,匈…
😀 野寻超级现金福利互推活动强势来袭~😀 最高可获2️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣元 🎯连续30天领取每日红包,累计“尾1”红包: 1️⃣3️⃣个“尾1” →6️⃣个名额 💴8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣+8️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣储值卡 1️⃣4️⃣个“尾1” →3️⃣个名额 💴3️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣+1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣储值卡 1️⃣5️⃣个“尾1” →1️⃣个名额 💴8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣+2️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣储值卡 ❤️奖励名额先到先得; 🧪按最高档领取,不重复叠加。 4⃣️ 活动时间 活动报名开启时间:北京时间2026年08月27日22:00 活动方案:https://t.me/chasesz_xlb 深圳交流:https://t.me/chasehz_jlq 深圳报名 : 野寻·南汐 @chase_nx 双向联系 @chase_nx_bot
等我赚了好多钱 一定会买下你片刻的柔情
探店笔记交流群(https://t.me/tdbhyfy ) 老师花名:小玉 联系方式:@Xiaoyu2590 学生留名:加里奥 颜值身材:人照9分 漂亮可爱 瘦瘦的 但波大 精简评价:首先感谢飞扬哥发放的-200优惠卷 才让我可以体验到如此完美的女孩 位置在酒店 没有保安 但不过在清湖的话 酒店环境也能理解 在酒店门口等候着小玉 随后便一起进了房间 正要开始进入主题的时候 小玉发现byt忘记带了哈哈 但不过这次我不赶时间 小玉也趁等外卖的间隙开了把王者 不得不说妲己还是太难玩了 很有操作难度 结束了游戏外卖也刚好到了 便开始一起洗澡 小玉脱下衣服的瞬间 我便看的入迷 小弟弟也翘的很高哈哈 随后洗完便上床 小玉在这方面的技术很是生疏 但不过嫩妹嘛也正常 所以在口完便戴上套套进行战斗 结果还是不出所料 123结束了战斗哈哈哈 屌感不错值得推荐! 推荐程度: 10 /满分10.0分;
起来开课啦,宝宝们😍
❤1
【极乐报告】 【极乐导航】:@jlmvip 【评价时间】:2026-09-06 【老师艺名】:龙华小玉 【老师飞机】:@Xiaoyu2590 【学生昵称】:张小凡 【学生飞机】: 【人照评分】:10 【颜值评分】:9.9 【身材评分】:10 【服务评分】:7 【态度评分】:8 【环境评分】:8 【综合评分】:9 【过程描述】: 老师比较佛系,不是天天开课,所以提前一天约好, 今天按约出击。老师很好沟通,顺利来到课室,课室很好找,是酒店的客房。 进门看见老师,眼前一亮,长相清秀美丽,身材高挑而凹凸有致,身高165+,且比例极好。老师话不多,搭了两句后就开始脱衣准备陪洗。脱完转过来一看,我只能用细支硕果,瘦底大胸来形容了,胸型也很好,承托着高挑的身材,让我感觉老师不应该是这个价位,会包装一点的话,也是千元以上。 服务就不说了,确实很简单,亲咪咪和口都有,但只是为了让你硬,这么好的小妹妹,我…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Xioauusl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小玉空间” (@Xioauusl), 343 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Xioauusl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.