Channel
@YanaYanaSok
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
239subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 17 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001243678679 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YanaYanaSok |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YanaYanaSok |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 239 | no change |
| 17 Sept 2026, 14:22 | 239 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 7 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (7 September 2026 – 15 September 2026) |
| Views total | 803 |
| Reactions total | 69 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
69 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 51 | 73.9% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 13.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 7.25% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 1.45% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2026 to 15 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Блиииииннннн…. Я сделала себе разбор Икигай в чате GPT. Это гениально. Икигай — это японская философия, которая означает «причину вставать по утрам» или то, что наполняет жизнь смыслом и радостью. Короче это микс того что вы любите, того что вы умеете, того что приносит миру пользу и того, за что вам готовы платить . На стыке этого всего ваш Икигай. Я это делала когда-то, но на коленке. А тут - подобнейший анализ…
❤3🔥1🙏1
Дорогие, выкладываю запись нашего эфира! Кто не был - обязательно посмотрите! Несколько полезных техник, разбирала и объясняла все: ✅как избавиться от того, что тормозит в ведении блога ✅как убрать страхи - давала рабочие инструменты ✅какой должен быть ваш маркетинг от и до, чтобы блог работал на вас системно (от привлечения аудитории до продаж) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-I3Lfiku3M
❤5❤🔥2🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
На самом деле не то чтобы я все время лежу на пляжу )) сейчас доделала презентацию-конспект по теме «Свобода через личный бренд» 🥰 Кто не был на мастермайнде - пишите «хочу» и я вышлю вас самую суть без воды, там одни ключи и техники 😍
❤2❤🔥1🐳1
Я сегодня ехала домой, стояла в пробке, слушала радио и услышала там классную мысль- «кто наполненный, тому есть чем делиться и он хочет делиться.» Очень хорошо эта мысль подходит к твоему мастермайнду
❤5
Яночка, благодарю за эфир! Подача простая и искренняя. Интересно было услышать о рамке восприятия, как себя перепрограмировать, это прям очень рабочая схема, о пирамиде позиционирования - как грамотно выстроить структуру своего дела от миссии до окружения. В целом было приятно тебя видеть, слышать 😊❤️ Спасибо, что делишься опытом!
❤4
Яна спасибо тебе! Мотивация точно появилась, услышал действительно отклики в твоих словах по нескольким моментам в которых сомневался, спасибо тебе! Уверен когад разберу текстовку и добавлю что-то в свой план действий будет еще мощнее! =) Пирамиду логических уровней точно забрал !
❤5
Яна- молодец, очень интересно было)) Я как раз стою на пути, что мне срочно нужно заняться развитием своего бренда, так как я вернулась в интерьеры, а соц сети в этом направлении никогда не вела... и тут как во время твой мастеркласс, огонь 🔥🔥🔥 зарядилась, спасибо начну что то делать!
❤5
Яна, это было так вдохновляюще! Твоя подача очень искренняя, сердечная и действительно заряжает на позитивный настрой😊 Спасибо огромное за структурированную, очень ценную информацию и за формат🫶🏻☀️
🔥4❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤2🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @YanaYanaSok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Яна Соколова | дневник маркетолога” (@YanaYanaSok), 239 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YanaYanaSok.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.