Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Yaqob Hamood

Channel

Yaqob Hamood

@Yaqob_Hamood

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,887subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001992693450
TypeChannel
Username@Yaqob_Hamood
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Yaqob_Hamood

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,8874,9084,897.56 August 2026 — 4,899 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,899 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,903 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,902 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,908 subscribers19 August 2026 — 4,907 subscribers22 August 2026 — 4,904 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,902 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,900 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,893 subscribers3 September 2026 — 4,895 subscribers7 September 2026 — 4,896 subscribers12 September 2026 — 4,888 subscribers15 September 2026 — 4,887 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,884–4,911 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 12:204,887-1
12 Sept 2026, 04:164,888-8
7 Sept 2026, 18:194,896+1
3 Sept 2026, 02:274,895+2
31 Aug 2026, 08:494,893-7
28 Aug 2026, 12:234,900-2
25 Aug 2026, 10:034,902-2
22 Aug 2026, 07:574,904-3
19 Aug 2026, 02:244,907-1
16 Aug 2026, 03:234,908+6
12 Aug 2026, 12:544,902-1
9 Aug 2026, 14:144,903+4
6 Aug 2026, 03:494,899no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:064,899first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 29 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

51 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4384.3%
👍47.84%
🔥47.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 May 2026, 20:46 UTC≈2,140 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

✉ simply you can determine QRS Axis : ➡️ See lead I ➡️See Lead aVF 🎙Then if QRS :in Lead I positive and in Lead aVF positive ➡️ normal axis 🎙 If QRS : in lead I positive and Lead aVF negative ➡️Left axis deviation 🎙 If QRS : in Lead I negative and in Lead aVF positive ➡️ Right Axis deviation 🎙If QRS : in lead I negative and in Lead aVF negative ➡️ Extreme Right Axis deviation or Extreme Axis deviation 👥 It's …

❤21👍2

17 May 2026, 19:15 UTC≈1,780 viewsread 12 August 2026

Each large sequre equal 0.2 second so each 30 large square equal 6 second So count R wave in 30 large square then multiply by 10 = rate per minute

17 May 2026, 18:44 UTC≈1,510 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Are you ready for ECG or ABG case or it's boring?

❤5

14 May 2026, 19:49 UTC≈2,370 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) Normal Ranges Here are the standard reference ranges: 🔹 pH: 7.35 – 7.45 🔹 PaO2: 75 – 100 mmHg (10.0 – 13.3 kPa) 🔹 PaCO2: 35 – 45 mmHg (4.7 – 6.0 kPa) 🔹 HCO3: 22 – 26 mEq/L 🔹 SaO2: 95% – 100% 💡 Pro-Tip: To quickly convert between units, use the factor 7.5. (Multiply kPa by 7.5 to get mmHg, or divide mmHg by 7.5 to get kPa)

❤4🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Yaqob_Hamood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 May 2026, 17:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz292 voters

What is the most common Acide Base disorder ?

  1. Metabolic Acidosis64%
  2. Metabolic alkalosis12%
  3. Respiratory Acidosis18%
  4. Respiratory Alkalosis5%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Learn ECG Easily
@ECG_Videoes · 22,035
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 September 2026
internal medicine
@easymedicine7 · 29,377
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
Medical MCQs
@MCQ_mogahed · 35,066
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 September 2026
Radiographie thoracique دكتور حوري بلقاسم
@radiographiethoraciquedrhouri · 21,905
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 September 2026
Boards and Beyond 2026
@Boards_Beyond · 46,956
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 27 August 2026
Pharmacology
@pharma_vid · 66,034
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 August 2026
Uworld 2025_2026
@mcqs772 · 42,565
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 September 2026
Polite Doctor🩺
@skills_first · 42,535
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Medical History🔍🩺
@hist_first · 21,099
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 25 September 2026
Physiology
@physiology_yaqob · 33,582
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Medical Guidelines 2025_2026
@Mmmmmm221234 · 36,116
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 2 September 2026
Ninja Nerd Notes
@NinjaNerd_Notes · 72,458
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
Internal Medicine
@inter_first · 29,634
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026
Osmosis
@osmosis_mogahed772 · 67,993
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
FUTURE DOCTORS 196🩺
@FUTUREDOCTORS_196 · 35,463
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
Pharmacology
@pharmacology2017 · 32,164
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
تفريغات مواد طبية
@tafrighat · 47,445
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Yaqob Hamood” (@Yaqob_Hamood), 4,887 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yaqob_Hamood.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.