Про асцит
❤484💔185custom 526703104348705188499💯19🔥18

Channel
@Youcanlivenow
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
29,983subscribers
+9,594 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002394539381 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Youcanlivenow |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Youcanlivenow |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
35,200 average views per post against 29,983 subscribers — an engagement rate of 117.4%. Across the 13,590 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,622 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.46% and 17.4%, with a median of 8.76%.
| Window | 30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 14 of 14 published in the window (0 exact, 14 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 492,900 |
| Mature posts only | 117.4% over 14 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 29,983 measured 26 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:rus · 13,590 channels · p10 2.28% · p25 4.46% · p50 8.76% · p75 17.4% · p90 30.1% |
| Position in cohort | 99.904th percentile · 13.4× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.099% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 29,983 | +346 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 29,637 | +119 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 29,518 | +3,993 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 25,525 | +19 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 25,506 | -23 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 25,529 | +1,061 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:22 | 24,468 | -10 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:35 | 24,478 | -32 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 24,510 | -29 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:28 | 24,539 | +17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:24 | 24,522 | -24 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 24,546 | -24 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 24,570 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 24,578 | +181 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 24,397 | +1,044 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:12 | 23,353 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 23,359 | +15 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 23,344 | +21 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 23,323 | +48 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 23,275 | first reading |
56 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 56 (7 June 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 492,900 |
| Reactions total | 17,174 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 10:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
56,378 reactions across 55 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30,557 | 54.2% | |
| 💔 | 14,015 | 24.9% | |
| custom 5267031043487051884 | 7,274 | 12.9% | |
| 🔥 | 1,983 | 3.52% | |
| 💯 | 1,717 | 3.05% | |
| 👀 | 640 | 1.14% | |
| 😁 | 146 | 0.259% | |
| custom 5458782963678322179 | 46 | 0.082% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56,378 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Youcanlivenow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 56 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 June 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Про асцит
❤484💔185custom 526703104348705188499💯19🔥18
Всем привет! Итак резюме моих 10 дней в больнице: - блевала каждые пол часа-час 5 дней - ежедневно капалась и была на кабивене - был удален порт под местной анастезией и это оказалось вообще не больно - поставлен второй стент, который приживается в миллиард раз проще, чем прошлый - все будни я работала, брала отгул только на день операции - я начала понемногу есть, но сейчас из-за того, что месяц во мне не было пищи,…
❤3,320custom 5267031043487051884633🔥242💯40
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤503custom 5267031043487051884111💔41💯30🔥14👀10
Пожалуйста, послушайте 🙏🏼 Огромная просьба: не писать в личку мне или моим близким
❤1,540💯538custom 5267031043487051884301💔69👀2
Мне удалили порт Короче сегодня попытались сделать инфузию через порт и снова меня начало колбасить: температура, озноб, сводило мышцы Меня быстро всю обкололи и сняли порт. Как итог: налет на мембране, скорей всего инфекция из иголки. Порт забрали на анализ. Пока буду без него Процедура для меня была абсолютно безболезненной, хотя сначала я расплакалась. Расплакалась потому, что у меня уже не было сил Меня рвет…
💔1,590custom 5267031043487051884607❤376🔥8😁5👀1
Ловлю себя на ощущении, что снова проваливаюсь в депрессию уже месяц я на капельницах, 3 недели я пыталась вернуть питание через рот и вроде бы все шло к улучшению, но нет сейчас 4 дня меня безостановочно рвет слюной, каждые пол часа-час, которая скапливается в зоне пищевода. От рвоты внутри все болит тк разражено и «царапается» текущим стентом я сейчас в больнице и жду информацию о дате повторного стентирования, …
💔1,630❤485custom 5267031043487051884234🔥1
В инсту выложила рецепты пары блюд и меня все так поздравляют с тем, что я ем. Что я похорошела. Только вот в чем дело: - похорошела я на кабивене, я на нем уже недели 2 непрерывно! - в день мне удается поесть 1-2 раза грамм по 100, а иногда не удается так как если меня начало рвать, то считай все, приехали Поэтому понимаю, как сильно искажает интернет реальность каждого из нас. Сегодня планирую капать альбумин, п…
❤846custom 5267031043487051884191💔170🔥12
Еду из офиса Не была там месяца 3, хотя ехать на метро по прямой всего 19 минут. Я помню так радовалась, когда переехала так близко и удобно Сегодня коллега устраивала обед в честь прошедшего ДР. Я конечно же хотела хоть немного пожевать чего-то, но эта зараза мне испортила весь день и каждые 15-20 минут я ходила блевать)))) а иногда бегала чаще так как нападала жесточайшая отрыжка, знаете, как у бати. Она громкая …
💔761❤158custom 526703104348705188436
Провела для вас небольшое интервью с Русланом Глинером на тему лечения в Израиле: - ценообразование и мифы о ценах на лечение в сравнении с Москвой - как можно полететь на лечение без депозита, а с детками получить помощь фондов - про прогнозы - какие нужны исследования для лечения или получения второго мнения - можно ли вылечить рак, если в России сказали, что шансов нет - история пациентки и бесплатные клинические …
❤259
Если кто-то знает патологоморфологов напишите сюда, плиз. Вопрос след: можно ли оценить по биопсии уровень патофомофоза? Мне почему-то сказали в Сеченова, что нельзя. Хотя я помню, что после операции на желудок оценивали его. Если можно, то скажите куда идти и как сдать блоки и стекла
❤135custom 52670310434870518849
Да блиииин, у меня опят т не хватило материала для генетической панели! Это какой-то адский ад, я не понимаю, что делать с этим, хоть убейте
💔335❤32👀24💯5
Делюсь контактом, который увидела у Людмилы Это Карина медсестра, обожаю ее, ставит капельницы и все что с этим связано Стоимость 5 тыс, она еще может и научить все делать, даже предлагала научить меня Губера ставить, но я пока сыкую Так что девочка ну супер классная и вообще не такая, что будет специально что-то делать мудрено только бы ей платили, вообще нет Номер телефона, я общаюсь в ватсап +7 988 649-85-36
❤200🔥45
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @Youcanlivenow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@Youcanlivenow edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“I AM | Я ЕСТЬ | ЖЕНЯ ТАРАН” (@Youcanlivenow), 29,983 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Youcanlivenow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.