Welcome to our chat! It’s made for crypto-talks) Here you can offer ways to improve our bots, which will be useful, Discuss and share ideas of income, trade. If you have any useful ways to automize routine processes, please share. We’ll consider. Link to chat - https://t.me/YourCryptoHelperChat

Channel
YourCryptoHelper
@YourCryptoHelper
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
162subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001351747256 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YourCryptoHelper |
| Created | 14 May 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YourCryptoHelper |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 162 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 163 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 164 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:00 | 166 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 166 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 14 May 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 November 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Thank you for taking the survey. We look forward to your effective feedback. As always, we wish you only to get rich, and not run into scam tokens.
Is a chat group for communication and making suggestions required?
- Yes86%
- No14%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Is a contact to communicate with the administration required?
- Yes78%
- No22%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Would you like to expand our bot functionality?
- Yes60%
- Yes, I know for sure what exactly would be useful to add and it will be helpful24%
- No, everything suits me9%
- I was just passing by7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you advertise our channel to your friends?
- Yes57%
- Yes, it is very cool, it bails me out and helps me earn money.21%
- No9%
- No, I'm just looking around here.13%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Should we introduce limits on the listing of tokens less than a certain amount of liquidity?
- No, everything suits me, I want to see all tokens.56%
- Yes, you should, but I do not know what the optimal threshold will be.18%
- Yes, introduce up to 1000 usd8%
- Yes, introduce up to 2000 usd2%
- Yes, introduce up to 3000 usd15%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Should we highlight the verified the tokens that have been verified by bscscan.com validators during posting ?
- yes95%
- no5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Should we restrict the posting of tokens indicating unicode symbols in their names if they stand out from the general mass and may mislead you
- yes71%
- no29%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Should we restrict the posting of tokens where telegram / other social networks are indicated?
- yes51%
- no49%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
How can you rate our bot according to the 5-point system?
- 113%
- 26%
- 316%
- 421%
- 545%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
For better understanding our users' requests. We want to put a couple of questions regarding our Pancake Swap Token Listing bot. Please take a few minutes of your time - this will help develop the bot in the right and relevant direction.
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @YourCryptoHelper. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Is a chat group for communication and making suggestions required?
- Yes86%
- No14%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Is a contact to communicate with the administration required?
- Yes78%
- No22%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Would you like to expand our bot functionality?
- Yes60%
- Yes, I know for sure what exactly would be useful to add and it will be helpful24%
- No, everything suits me9%
- I was just passing by7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you advertise our channel to your friends?
- Yes57%
- Yes, it is very cool, it bails me out and helps me earn money.21%
- No9%
- No, I'm just looking around here.13%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Should we introduce limits on the listing of tokens less than a certain amount of liquidity?
- No, everything suits me, I want to see all tokens.56%
- Yes, you should, but I do not know what the optimal threshold will be.18%
- Yes, introduce up to 1000 usd8%
- Yes, introduce up to 2000 usd2%
- Yes, introduce up to 3000 usd15%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Should we highlight the verified the tokens that have been verified by bscscan.com validators during posting ?
- yes95%
- no5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2021 to 26 November 2021. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“YourCryptoHelper” (@YourCryptoHelper), 162 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YourCryptoHelper.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.