Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 小唯🦋私域🏠

Channel

小唯🦋私域🏠

@Yt02707

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,071subscribers

+205 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003951916503
TypeChannel
Username@Yt02707
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 30 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Yt02707

Growth

8661,071968.528 August 2026 — 866 subscribers28 August 2026 — 888 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,071 subscribers28 August 20264 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +205. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 835–1,102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 14:581,071+183
28 Aug 2026, 17:54888+22
28 Aug 2026, 12:45866first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
94.1%
avg views ÷ 1,071 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,010
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.086%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held20 (30 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total17,133
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
27s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1292.3%
🥰17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC≈1,050 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

💋起床上课啦哥哥们💋🈳位多🉑约

1

21 Aug 2026, 04:43 UTC≈1,120 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

🈶🈳位哦!只要哥哥喜欢,我可以是任何样子😘😘😘

1

20 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 28 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-19 【老师】:小唯 【留名】:村长 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:10 【过程】:献给第一次cj就遇到极品的女神小唯!还是这浪漫的七夕节日里! 试问有谁能拒绝这么可爱的老师呢?灿烂的笑脸,迎接回家,纯白的紧身上衣根本藏不住饱满的大白兔,超短牛仔裤衬托一双长过我条命的大长腿,顶不住,根本顶不住! 洗澡的时候,小唯去换装,想象中就已经硬的不行了。洗完出来,老师换了一身职业ol装,完美身材一览无遗!最后一丝理性都没有了,提枪先上了兄弟们。 总结就是,温柔娇嫩的小白兔+顶级诱惑的完美身材,试问谁能顶得住!

19 Aug 2026, 05:21 UTC≈1,170 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

💋💋💋七夕节快乐!哥哥们🈶🈳位有空有空哦,服务到位温柔听话😋😘😘

1

19 Aug 2026, 05:14 UTC≈1,080 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @baogaobangbb

👉香山(珠海/中山)严选群👈 【验证留名】:Dt 【验证时间】:8.18 【妹子花名】:#小唯 【所在位置】:#西区 【课室环境】:干净整洁 【上课学费】:p 【颜值打分】:9 【胸器罩杯】:D 【服务内容】:口,胸推,做 【服务详情】:约了两天,终于约到老师了,晚上天气有些凉,但是想到等会要见到老师了,内心却是火热的,刚出门,晴空万里的天就突然下起大雨,左顾右盼发现车里没带伞,想着待会估计要成落汤鸡了,好巧,刚到地方,雨停了,像是一种莫名的缘分在推着走,跟着老师的指导遥控上门,推开门的一瞬间,第一眼就看到老师的脸探出来了,髣髴兮若轻云之蔽月,飘飖兮若流风之回雪。 确实惊艳到我了,虽然跟照片的不太一样,但是五官很好,颜值很高,现实中看着没有照片的假面感,妆化得不浓。推门而入,一眼扫去,高挑的身姿配上姣好的头身比,整体的感受就是风姿绰约。利落的交完水费就去冲凉房了,没过一会老师就进来用削葱玉指抚摸我的身体,指尖划过带着丝丝清

2

18 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 28 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-18 【老师】:小唯 【留名】:waaqwm 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:10 【过程】:【推荐程度】:5⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️(参照末尾星级评判标准) 【验证留名】:爸爸 【验证时间】:8.18 【老师艺名】:#小唯 【所在位置】:#西区 【上课学费】:1200 【身高身材】:170cm 【颜值相似】:真人比照片好看 【凶器罩杯】:d 【服务内容】:pp 【服务详情】:#看到榜上又来了个嫩妹老师,然后就迫不及待赶紧人到了喊我下去接,第一眼给人的感觉就是清新脱俗皮肤白嫩的小女生,皮肤属于那种冷白皮类型,穿着个小短裤长腿的让人一看就很有欲望,确实了我是下来接她的之后有点害羞的感觉,礼貌特别的好,上来洗了个澡就直接进入主题了,刚出来的老师就是敏感,水哗啦啦的流,床单湿了一大片,高潮时候的呻吟声真让人欲罢不能,我点的是PP,中场休息的

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Yt02707. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“小唯🦋私域🏠” (@Yt02707), 1,071 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yt02707.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.