Dida mostrava enorme segurança quando precisava proteger o gol em partidas decisivas! O goleiro foi um dos grandes da história do Brasil. Qual defesa mostrou sua genialidade? 🇧🇷

Channel
ZTT.BET
@Z11bet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,441subscribers
-118 since we began measuring on 3 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002044408559 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Z11bet |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Z11bet |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 5,441 | -39 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 5,480 | -20 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:20 | 5,500 | -51 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 5,551 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:22 | 5,559 | no change |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:47 | 5,559 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.01%
- avg views ÷ 5,441 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 54.8
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (17 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 767 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 20s
- Average length
- 17s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Dunga representava liderança, intensidade e muita determinação dentro de campo! O capitão do tetra de 94 era a alma do time. Qual lance mostrou sua genialidade? 🇧🇷
Vem fazer a FEZINHA
Kleberson combinava inteligência e versatilidade para contribuir em diferentes setores do meio-campo! O volante foi campeão mundial em 2002. Qual lance mostrou sua genialidade? 🇧🇷
OLHO NO PEIXÃO! 👁🐳 O Santos de Neymar e Gabigol anunciou a contratação de Arthur e ainda negocia com Rodinei e Emerson Palmieri. O clube da Vila Belmiro tá montando um bom time?
Léo Moura combinava habilidade e experiência para apoiar o ataque com muita qualidade! O lateral era uma peça importante em campo. Qual lance mostrou sua genialidade? 🇧🇷
Luis Fabiano era um atacante de presença forte e muito eficiente na hora de finalizar! O Fabuloso foi um dos grandes artilheiros do Brasil. Qual gol mostrou sua genialidade? 🇧🇷
Uma obra-prima coberta de ouro está pronta para ser revelada. Teste os multiplicadores que o Touro preparou para hoje! 🐂💰
Rafinha combinava velocidade, técnica e muita qualidade para apoiar o ataque! O lateral era uma arma ofensiva importante. Qual lance mostrou sua genialidade? 🇧🇷
Willian desequilibrava pelos lados com dribles rápidos e muita agilidade! O ponta era uma constante ameaça. Qual lance mostrou sua genialidade? 🇧🇷
Fred ganhou espaço pela intensidade e pela movimentação no meio-campo! O volante era essencial para o funcionamento do time. Qual lance mostrou sua genialidade? 🇧🇷
Motores aquecidos e a maior rivalidade de Minas Gerais pronta para decidir vaga na Copa do Brasil! 🏆💰
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Z11bet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@vipyhgame · 33,871
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 3 September 2026
@Afunvip88 · 49,640
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ZTT.BET” (@Z11bet), 5,441 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Z11bet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.