Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ZANQA

Channel

ZANQA

@ZANQA_APP

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,577subscribers

-69 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001582298109
TypeChannel
Username@ZANQA_APP
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZANQA_APP

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,5776,6466,611.57 August 2026 — 6,646 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,645 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,638 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,637 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,629 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,624 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,619 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,613 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,605 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,602 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,592 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,580 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,577 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net -69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,567–6,656 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:156,577-3
10 Sept 2026, 17:226,580-12
5 Sept 2026, 05:216,592-10
1 Sept 2026, 12:346,602-3
29 Aug 2026, 06:156,605-8
26 Aug 2026, 04:436,613-6
23 Aug 2026, 10:276,619-5
20 Aug 2026, 06:046,624-5
16 Aug 2026, 22:146,629-8
13 Aug 2026, 12:286,637-1
10 Aug 2026, 22:256,638-7
7 Aug 2026, 19:576,645-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:026,646first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

361 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22261.5%
👍4713.0%
😢359.70%
👎256.93%
👀195.26%
😁102.77%
🔥20.554%
😱10.277%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 361 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC695 views24 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

شو رأيكم بهيك شي؟ ❤️ حبيت

24

10 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC740 views15 reactionsread 20 August 2026

شغلات طلبتوا وهتوصلكم بداية العام القادم - استعادة حساب بتفك القفل عن الحساب. - عرض الملف صار أسرع بمرتين. - فيكم تحطوا اشارة نجمة عم تضوي بأي لون وبأي حجم عند أي فقرة بدكم ياها. - تحميل الملفات بيكفي بالخلفية بشرط عدم إيقاف التطبيق وإلا الملف بينزل مضروب. - وضع اللاإنترنت صار فيه خيار تحميل الفيديوات (ارشفتها). - تحسينات بالعرض.. #زنقة

15

9 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC812 views71 reactionsread 20 August 2026

رأيك بخدمة زنقة من خلال الإيموجيز ❤️ على عيني 👍 جيدة 🥲 غير جيدة #زنقة

39👍23😢8😁1

6 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC≈1,130 views34 reactionsread 20 August 2026

احيانا بتجرب تدخل كلمة السر ٤ و ٥ مرات وبتكون غلط فبينقفل حسابك ٣ او ٤ ساعات للحماية... شو رأيك بتنفيذ استعادة حساب نشيل القفل عن حسابك؟ ❤️ مع الفكرة #زنقة

34

3 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC≈1,310 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026

منشور توضيحي كتير منكم ما بيعرف ليش بيبعت نقطة او رسالة لواتس اب...⁉️ 👈 الفكرة ببساطة، نحنا عم نتاكد إنك صاحب الرقم قبل ما يتم ارسال اي معلومات الك... وقت ترسل نقطة او أي رسالة 💬، المنصة بتعرف هالشخص بدو يشترك بزنقة أو ذاكر وهاد الرقم إله فبتبعتلك الرمز. #زنقة

5

2 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,250 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

شوية تحسينات بالعرض ❤️ وهنوفرلكم امكانية التدوير طبعا... ورح نشتغل عفكرة تحميل الفيديوهات بالخلفية. #زنقة

6🔥2

2 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC≈1,200 views56 reactionsread 20 August 2026

مين بده زر لتدوير التطبيق بدلا من تدوير النظام التلقائي؟ فيك تحطه أفقي، عامودي او يتبع تدوير النظام. ❤️ بدي 👍 لا عادي #زنقة

40👍14👎2

30 Jul 2026, 08:51 UTC≈1,870 views29 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

عم نرسم الكن لانو منحبكم 😌❤️ ترا تعذبنا فيها والله 😂 #زنقة

21👀7👎1

28 Jul 2026, 19:06 UTC≈1,730 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👀121😱1

28 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTC≈1,600 views21 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Poll

أعطونا رأيكم بصراحة: الفرق التي ليست ضمن زنقة، ماذا لا تخدم به الطلاب؟

  1. محتوى مطبوع حصرا51%
  2. ملفات الكترونية متأخرة32%
  3. أسعار متغيرة او عالية38%

The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👎20👍1

27 Jul 2026, 18:55 UTC≈1,470 views15 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

مساكم خير يا مجتهدين ❤️

14👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ZANQA_APP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTCAnonymous Poll79 voters

أعطونا رأيكم بصراحة: الفرق التي ليست ضمن زنقة، ماذا لا تخدم به الطلاب؟

  1. محتوى مطبوع حصرا51%
  2. ملفات الكترونية متأخرة32%
  3. أسعار متغيرة او عالية38%

The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ZANQA” (@ZANQA_APP), 6,577 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZANQA_APP.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.