Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 中央群扫黑曝光频道

Channel

中央群扫黑曝光频道

@ZFB88988

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,114subscribers

+27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002277476403
TypeChannel
Username@ZFB88988
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZFB88988

Growth

3,0873,1383,112.57 August 2026 — 3,087 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,093 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,098 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,111 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,114 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,121 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,119 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,122 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,130 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,138 subscribers8 September 2026 — 3,114 subscribers3,1147 August 20268 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 32 days, net +27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,079–3,146 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 16:013,114-24
3 Sept 2026, 08:543,138+8
31 Aug 2026, 09:123,130+8
28 Aug 2026, 01:243,122+3
25 Aug 2026, 02:063,119-2
21 Aug 2026, 05:463,121+7
17 Aug 2026, 21:333,114+3
14 Aug 2026, 21:533,111+13
11 Aug 2026, 07:473,098+5
8 Aug 2026, 04:563,093+6
7 Aug 2026, 17:023,087first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
650.0%
👎216.7%
🤡216.7%
🥴216.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC274 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @wXeu5Zq_0YI5MWY1

📢通知 鹿鹿解限客服已经没做了 任何交易与我无关 鹿鹿只卖号 不解限制 鹿鹿只有一个账号 没有任何客服账号 认准 @lulu888881 +888 0617 5940

Signed 西门大屌 查档专业代取(全能教父)

6 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC869 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

解限跑路,正常客户甲反扫完回过款聊天框被删,该团队一成员发新消息来要回款成功图,助理和此人核实金额是同号并发了成功图,几分钟后发来不同地址说未收到,且此人和客户甲不是同一个人,现说没回给他们,现欠的解限钱也不结算,开庭拖拖拉拉不积极处理。 @dizang6668888999 @A181031 @qiuqiu_000 @dht18888 @bawan_321 客户甲回款地址: TCXAE4WYDUV3SPU7UwQfug92kZJpNUPs1K

2

Signed 西门大屌 查档专业代取(全能教父)

6 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC798 viewsread 7 August 2026

高价收人头技术,要稳定多收的,测试成功额外奖励5000U,原技术费用照给不误 高价收贷款地,真机3无限吃量,合作成功额外奖励5000u 欢迎大家骚扰 @HeiMa_boss

Signed ZS(认准+888) 张三

3 Aug 2026, 02:52 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 7 August 2026

避雷 骗子

Signed 西门潘安(流量卡.带开会员)

3 Aug 2026, 02:52 UTC≈1,730 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

1

Signed 西门潘安(流量卡.带开会员)

2 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 7 August 2026

个体工商企业来个号商,长期包养 @HeiMa_boss

Signed ZS(认准+888) 张三

2 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC≈1,730 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

于2026年7月31日联系说吃地聊好的7天售后,8月1日到达目的地手机线下给了5台,当天晚上回来了3台8号,现场验号结算,当天顶号6个,第二天早上顶号2个,全部顶完,给的理由是他没还钱没给小弟结算工资,所以顶号,我们当时是验完马上付款了的。就说不做了退还剩余7台手机,还要求我们付800,线下又见了一面的,后面又联系说给300一会给600,坚决抵制,咱们不差那点,直到8月2号下午他说他是中介,结算都是接受给他的,手机也交付给他的,不管中介也好,一起的也好,就摆明说幺妹给钱取手机 要么我欠到,问他多久还 他给你冒一句赚道歉就还 。25年的时候还有人与他合作过,近期应该也有 大家注意下,这点钱给他全家买棺材了。不需要他还!!! @Yuese66 深夜书屋 钱包地址TStiZW5LxME97z4XfgduCwLX5Usg94NacF

1

Signed 星星星 (解限代取/代还花呗)

1 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC≈2,570 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

TJEk3AtcF7qj1nT3yUdJzoDCDjLPZYxmcn TKGDKxZmyeZPHUjUjkRPSPJzaDhtQrNQ2s 这是他家的地址 @baima81+888 0470 1936白马说自己是直盘。混熟脸骗预付。骗了钱还说的这么好听的。有事找他。还说 1000U给我教训。我是他他妈操了 没有给钱吗。还是把他全家让中国全部男的都操了一遍。没有给钱。贼他吗。真是死了全家。死他妈,死了他妈 死他亲戚 狗日的 白马你是杂毛日出来的吗 ,还是你妈和狗日出来的。真是个杂毛货。你妈也是个杂毛品种吧。你全家都是杂毛品种 没有一个是正种。杂毛 就是杂毛。 你在频道说你们的合作商被骗1000U 说你们忘记续费 你那么大个盘口 市场上唯一的一个号 你忘记续费 刚好在忘记续费的一天被骗了 你能说的过去了 是不是拿市场上的所有做支付的人当三岁小孩 既然你说你们是真的 不是骗子 你又是那么大盘口 又是因为你们的原因忘记+888号续

2👎2🤡2🥴2

Signed 星星星 (解限代取/代还花呗)

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @ZFB88988. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“中央群扫黑曝光频道” (@ZFB88988), 3,114 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZFB88988.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.