Channel
@ZMR_DI
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,229subscribers
-89 since we began measuring on 29 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001376942132 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZMR_DI |
| Description | يا ذَنبي الماتبت مِنه 🤍. - قنَـاة التمويـَـل : @IXIX1Q - ڪروبنا : |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZMR_DI |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 02:56 | 21,229 | -89 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 21,318 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 1 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
94 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 74 | 78.7% | |
| 😭 | 13 | 13.8% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 7.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2025 to 11 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ZMR_DI. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2025 to 11 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
✅ نهاية تغطيتنا لمُباراة اليوم، مبارك الفوز بالدوري كوليز و إن شاء الله القادم أفضل، نرجو أن تكون التغطية قد نالت إعجابكم دمتم بسلام و تصبحون على خير 💙💙 ⚠️ رابط قناة الميديا الخاصة بالفيديوهات (تم توفير المُباراة كاملة بدقة مختلفة + ملخص المُباراة + الأهداف) للإنضمام : 🔵
❤26🤣5
Signed $
🚨🚨 بيان النادي: ببالغ الحزن والأسى، تلقينا نبأ وفاة والد هانسي فليك. يتقدّم نادي برشلونة وجميع أفراد عائلة البلوغرانا بكل الحب والدعم إلى هانسي فليك بعد وفاة والده. نشاركك حزنك، وقلوبنا وأفكارنا معك ومع عائلتك في هذا الوقت الصعب.
❤4
Signed $
🩷
❤6
Signed $
🌟#خــبــر >> (SPORT): 🔴 كريستنسن يسابق الزمن: عودته إلى كلاسيكو برشلونة وريال مدريد محل شك كبير. ⚠️ كريستنسن عاد للتدرب مع المجموعة منذ 29 أبريل، لكنه لا يزال بعيدًا عن الجاهزية الكاملة بسبب إصابته الطويلة في الركبة اليسرى. ❌ مشاركته في الكلاسيكو أمام ريال مدريد مشكوك فيها جدًا، وحتى إذا حصل على التصريح الطبي، فمن غير المتوقع أن يلعب. ••☆ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━
❤2
Signed $
🌟#خــبــر >> (SPORT): 🔴✅ كوندي سيكون “مُضاد فينيسيوس” في الكلاسيكو. ••☆ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━
🤣2
Signed $
• 📤🗞 #صــحــيــفــة °⋫ SPORT 🔵🔴 ⭕️ - كوندي، إريك غارسيا أم أراوخو: من سيكون سلاح برشلونة لإيقاف فينيسيوس في الكلاسيكو أمام ريال مدريد؟ . ⭕️ - هانسي يملك ثلاثة خيارات والخيار الأقرب هو كوندي، باعتباره الظهير الأيمن الأساسي، لكن إريك غارسيا يبقى خيارًا قويًا بعد ظهوره الجيد في هذا المركز . ⭕️ - أما أراوخو فحظوظه أقل، رغم خبرته السابقة في مواجهة فينيسيوس. برشلونة يرى أن السيطرة على فينيسيوس هي مفتاح إضعاف ريال مدريد …
❤3
Signed $
🧑🏻💼🎙#فـيـرنـانـدو_بـولـو °⋫ MD 🔵🔴 • 💬 الشجار الذي حصل بين تشواميني وفالفيردي، كان محط نقاش غرفة ملابس برشلونة . • 💬 وصلت معلومات بشأن الحادثة للاعبي الفريق عبر مصادر غير مباشرة ، وبحسب ما يتم تداوله داخل الفريق الكتالوني، فإن الغالبية ترى أن فالفيردي هو المسؤول الأكبر عن الحادثة . • 💬 بعض لاعبي برشلونة من المنتخب الإسباني استدعوا حادثة اعتدائه على أليكس باينا عندما كان لاعبًا في فياريال عام 2023 . • 💬 ناقش لاعبو…
❤1
Signed $
• 🇪🇸📲 بـابـلـو غـافـي عـبـرَ °↜ ( 🌐 ) :
❤1
Signed $
• 🇪🇸📲 إيـريـك غـارسـيـا عـبـرَ °↜ ( 🌐 ) :
Signed $
ألفارو كورتيس 👤
Signed $
النادي يُهنّئ لاعبنا ومدربنا السابق لويس إنريكي بمناسبة عيد ميلاده الـ56.
❤1
Signed $
Channel name was changed to «جميع اخبار نادي برشلونة»
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ZMR_DI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“جميع اخبار نادي برشلونة” (@ZMR_DI), 21,229 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZMR_DI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.