Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ZONE FOOT QUIZZ ❓

Channel

ZONE FOOT QUIZZ ❓

@ZONEFOOTQUIZZ

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,430subscribers

-224 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003529066602
TypeChannel
Username@ZONEFOOTQUIZZ
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZONEFOOTQUIZZ

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,4307,6547,54214 August 2026 — 7,654 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,647 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,624 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,596 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,606 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,575 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,586 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,567 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,515 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,482 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,457 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,430 subscribers14 August 202619 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 37 days, net -224. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,396–7,688 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 16:187,430-27
14 Sept 2026, 23:017,457-25
11 Sept 2026, 12:017,482-33
7 Sept 2026, 04:157,515-52
2 Sept 2026, 11:047,567-19
30 Aug 2026, 02:137,586+11
26 Aug 2026, 23:037,575-31
23 Aug 2026, 23:247,606+10
20 Aug 2026, 09:427,596-28
17 Aug 2026, 17:347,624-23
14 Aug 2026, 22:177,647-7
14 Aug 2026, 04:017,654first reading

Engagement

58 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.2%
avg views ÷ 7,430 subscribers
Avg views / post
981
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 58 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held58 (4 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total15,702
Reactions total239
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 21:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,202 reactions across 58 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
92376.8%
🤣19916.6%
🔥373.08%
🎉211.75%
😁80.666%
👎70.582%
🏆30.25%
👍20.166%
🍾10.083%
🗿10.083%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,202 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC439 views22 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🤣166

Signed NOANN

27 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC602 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

12

Signed MMG MOÏSE 🇨🇩 SUPR

27 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC599 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

8

Signed MMG MOÏSE 🇨🇩 SUPR

27 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC647 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

13

Signed MMG MOÏSE 🇨🇩 SUPR

26 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC744 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

6

Signed 𝐓𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐳𝐲

25 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC≈4,380 views19 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

19

Signed 𝑻.

24 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC822 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Lors de la finale de Coupe d’Europe 1959-60, contre quel club le Real Madrid a-t-il remporté sa 5e Coupe d’Europe consécutive ?

  1. Stade de Reims35%
  2. Benfica Lisbonne18%
  3. Eintracht Francfort21%
  4. AC Milan20%
  5. Fc Barcelone6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11

24 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC753 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Qui était le gardien de l'Argentine lors de la finale de la Coupe du monde 1978 ?

  1. Ubaldo Fillol24%
  2. Nery Pumpido22%
  3. Sergio Goycochea34%
  4. Héctor Baley21%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥121

Signed AMON

24 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC803 views27 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🎉21🏆32🍾1

Signed AMON

Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @ZONEFOOTQUIZZ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 18 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz276 voters

Lors de la finale de Coupe d’Europe 1959-60, contre quel club le Real Madrid a-t-il remporté sa 5e Coupe d’Europe consécutive ?

  1. Stade de Reims35%
  2. Benfica Lisbonne18%
  3. Eintracht Francfort21%
  4. AC Milan20%
  5. Fc Barcelone6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz268 voters

Qui était le gardien de l'Argentine lors de la finale de la Coupe du monde 1978 ?

  1. Ubaldo Fillol24%
  2. Nery Pumpido22%
  3. Sergio Goycochea34%
  4. Héctor Baley21%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTCFinal Results275 voters

lors de la coupe du monde 1938 en France , quel joueur a inscrit quatre buts dans un même match, mais son équipe a tout de même perdu.

  1. Leônidas8%
  2. Giuseppe Meazza23%
  3. Ernst Wilimowski9%
  4. Silvio Piola13%
  5. György Sárosi11%
  6. Jean Nicolas16%
  7. Josef Bican21%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTCFinal Results389 voters

Quel est le club dans cette liste ayant joué le plus de matchs en Ligue des Champions sans jamais l'avoir remportée ❓️

  1. Atletico madrid39%
  2. Arsenal32%
  3. Dynamo Kiev3%
  4. Paris saint Germain ( avant 2025)13%
  5. Galatasaray7%
  6. Olympiakos6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTCAnonymous Quiz332 voters

Lequel de ces arbitres à arbitré le plus de matchs en Ligue des Champions ❓️

  1. Félix Brych7%
  2. Clément Turpin40%
  3. Danny makkelie7%
  4. Björn kuipers8%
  5. Szymon marciniak38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz336 voters

Quel club africain a été le premier à atteindre la finale de la Coupe intercontinentale ?

  1. USFAS Bamako3%
  2. Zamalek7%
  3. Petro Luanda4%
  4. Sundows3%
  5. MC Alger7%
  6. TP Mazembe26%
  7. Espérance Tunis14%
  8. Al Ahly34%
  9. Sonabel Ouagadougou3%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ZONE FOOT QUIZZ ❓” (@ZONEFOOTQUIZZ), 7,430 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZONEFOOTQUIZZ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.