謝啦老朋友 謝謝你對我這麼好 一如既往的支持 有空想安排就找我 因為有你們 我才常常覺得很溫暖 今天幫大大安排小玉妹妹 超有女友感 會主動抱著撒嬌 聊天、親親、舌吻 ~~~ 前戲也有自己的節奏 互動很自然 真的不像約 比較像在跟異地女友見面 她超久沒報班 難得來一次 雙北預算有限的大大可以優先考慮喔 #12k一節 有需要再來跟可可說喔❤️ ⭐Gleezy:etkQzglij |🌐 TG:@tw88t
🫡2😍2👏1🔥1😁1
Signed Coco-外約的心動

Channel
@ZZZzzz437
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
7,897subscribers
-388 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002318757006 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZZZzzz437 |
| Description | 我希望這裡不只是放資料、接預約的頻道 而是一個讓你願意慢慢看、放心問 也值得再次回來的地方 每個人的喜好和預算都不同 我不會告訴你誰一定最好 只會盡量幫你找到更適合自己的選擇 資訊說清楚、價格先確認、隱私好好保護 謝謝每一位願意把信任交給Coco的人 TG: @tw88t | TG: @xm2766 LINE:xm2766 | Gleezy:etkQzglij 主頻道:https://t.me/ZZZzzz437 Gleezy:https://c.gleezy.top/Coco22 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZZZzzz437 |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 15:57 | 7,897 | -13 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 7,910 | -15 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:09 | 7,925 | -13 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:58 | 7,938 | -18 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:44 | 7,956 | -11 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:50 | 7,967 | -7 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 07:09 | 7,974 | -15 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 05:39 | 7,989 | -19 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 09:42 | 8,008 | -33 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 22:42 | 8,041 | -46 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 8,087 | -11 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 8,098 | -18 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 8,116 | -32 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:34 | 8,148 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 8,160 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 8,171 | -13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 8,184 | -26 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 8,210 | -8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 8,218 | -17 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 8,235 | first reading |
191 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 191 (6 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 3,059 |
| Reactions total | 252 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 11:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,544 reactions across 153 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 253 | 16.4% | |
| 🔥 | 253 | 16.4% | |
| ❤ | 244 | 15.8% | |
| 😍 | 230 | 14.9% | |
| 🥰 | 189 | 12.2% | |
| 👏 | 120 | 7.77% | |
| 👌 | 64 | 4.15% | |
| 🫡 | 55 | 3.56% | |
| 😁 | 54 | 3.50% | |
| 🤣 | 21 | 1.36% | |
| 🎉 | 18 | 1.17% | |
| 🥴 | 12 | 0.777% | |
| 🐳 | 10 | 0.648% | |
| 💋 | 7 | 0.453% | |
| 🤓 | 4 | 0.259% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 0.194% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.194% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 0.13% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 154 of the 191 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,544 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 191 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 34 posts held from the last 30 days (26.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
謝啦老朋友 謝謝你對我這麼好 一如既往的支持 有空想安排就找我 因為有你們 我才常常覺得很溫暖 今天幫大大安排小玉妹妹 超有女友感 會主動抱著撒嬌 聊天、親親、舌吻 ~~~ 前戲也有自己的節奏 互動很自然 真的不像約 比較像在跟異地女友見面 她超久沒報班 難得來一次 雙北預算有限的大大可以優先考慮喔 #12k一節 有需要再來跟可可說喔❤️ ⭐Gleezy:etkQzglij |🌐 TG:@tw88t
🫡2😍2👏1🔥1😁1
Signed Coco-外約的心動
又收到老朋友的預約了~ 昨天支持過 今天有空再來安排20k漂亮空姐 能被一直選擇 比被誇還開心 可可會繼續用心把每一次都做好 不辜負大家的信任😘 ⭐Gleezy:etkQzglij |🌐 TG:@tw88t
👏2🔥2😍2❤1👍1
Signed Coco-外約的心動
一樣的雨露均沾 可是很想大家的 哈哈哈哈
Signed Coco-外約的心動
忙完回來囉~ 可可閃亮登場~~~😀
Signed Coco-外約的心動
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Coco-外約的心動
早安 新的一天 細心把關每一個細節 是可可對品質不變的承諾 願你今天工作高效、心情愉悅 隨時準備迎接美好的相遇 ⭐Gleezy:etkQzglij |🌐 TG:@tw88t
Signed Coco-外約的心動
雙倍快樂! #犯罪感 #剛成年18歲姐妹雙飛 想體驗嗎😈
❤3😍3👍2👏2🔥2
Signed Coco-外約的心動
今天推薦一位大奶妹妹給大家~💕 想要揉揉柔軟的胸部嗎?😏 真奶 F 杯-宛如 162cm F奶 47kg 27歲 奶子軟軟的、份量很足 摸起來手感超好 喜歡大奶的真的可以約 想約的私訊可可就好~💌 #真奶 #可約 ⭐Gleezy:etkQzglij |🌐 TG:@tw88t
❤3👏3🔥3😍3👍2
Signed Coco-外約的心動
情況就是這麽個情況 具體啥情況 還得看情況 鷄毛阿姨-可可 為大家服務🤣😀
🤣4👍3🤩3🥴3😁3
Signed Coco-外約的心動
哈哈哈哈各退一步成功! 萱萱老點一節25k預約上囉 超正 好玩會玩的妹妹 高顔值 #可預約 ⭐Gleezy:etkQzglij |🌐 TG:@tw88t
😁4❤3👍3👏3🔥3
Signed Coco-外約的心動
謝謝親愛的大力支持! 特別安排了騷騷的月牙眼妹妹 被信任的感覺真的很開心 可可會繼續用心做好每一次安排 想約的私訊我就好~ #今日開門紅 ⭐Gleezy:etkQzglij |🌐 TG:@tw88t
👍3🔥3🥰3🫡3❤2
Signed Coco-外約的心動
就是這麽霸道 好好笑 哈哈哈 跟我客人的沙雕對話🤣 ⭐Gleezy:etkQzglij |🌐 TG:@tw88t
👍3🤣3🥴3🫡3😁3
Signed Coco-外約的心動
Showing the 12 most recent of 191 posts we hold for @ZZZzzz437. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
現在最想把哪種妹妹壓在床上?
The shares total 273%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
如果現在安排的妹妹躺在你面前 你最想先對她做哪一件事?😈
The shares total 218%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 191 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Coco獨家正妹の高端嚴選〔+大G:etkQzglij〕” (@ZZZzzz437), 7,897 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZZZzzz437.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.