Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЗУБ: записки учителя биологии

Channel

ЗУБ: записки учителя биологии

@ZametkiUchitelya

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

11,832subscribers

+287 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002217212667
TypeChannel
Username@ZametkiUchitelya
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZametkiUchitelya

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,53811,83211,6856 August 2026 — 11,545 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,545 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,549 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,546 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,545 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,543 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,538 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,557 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,559 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,556 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,555 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,549 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,544 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,543 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,542 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,541 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,544 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,594 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,642 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,658 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,697 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,714 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,711 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,716 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,738 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,768 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,780 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,783 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,776 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,805 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,801 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,798 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,821 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,832 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +287. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,494–11,876 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:4111,832+11
16 Sept 2026, 08:4111,821+23
14 Sept 2026, 15:5611,798-3
12 Sept 2026, 23:1611,801-4
11 Sept 2026, 02:1811,805+29
8 Sept 2026, 03:2011,776-7
5 Sept 2026, 01:4111,783+3
3 Sept 2026, 09:1811,780+12
2 Sept 2026, 02:0311,768+30
1 Sept 2026, 00:2711,738+22
30 Aug 2026, 21:3311,716+5
29 Aug 2026, 20:1311,711-3
28 Aug 2026, 21:3611,714+17
27 Aug 2026, 18:1811,697+39
26 Aug 2026, 16:1911,658+16
25 Aug 2026, 13:3711,642+48
24 Aug 2026, 12:0511,594+50
22 Aug 2026, 16:4411,544+3
21 Aug 2026, 10:0211,541-1
20 Aug 2026, 12:1711,542first reading

Engagement

70 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.7%
avg views ÷ 11,832 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,980
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 70 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held70 (27 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total33,690
Reactions total2,728
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21m 18s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 45 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

13,400 reactions across 70 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5,18538.7%
❤4,23131.6%
👍1,87314.0%
🥰7815.83%
👏3522.63%
👀2521.88%
😱2371.77%
😁1951.46%
🤣1000.746%
🤔470.351%
✍240.179%
🤩190.142%
🆒180.134%
😍160.119%
❤‍🔥140.104%
😨130.097%
👎100.075%
🤯80.06%
🎉50.037%
🙈50.037%
11 further kinds150.112%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,400 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 70 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ZametkiUchitelya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 70 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:40 UTC≈1,140 views160 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Друзья, несу вам десять секунд бесконечного умиления! Вы только посмотрите, эту маму-потору угостили клубникой и не пожалели ягодки для её малыша, который пока толком не понимает, что с ней делать, но дар определённо оценил. Трёхпалые крысиные потору, как вы заметили, ребятки сумчатые. Обитают они в Австралии, к обычным крысам отношения никакого не имеют, а имеют отношение к крысам кенгуровым, и являются довольно б…

❤73🥰46👍22🔥14👏3😍2

2 Sept 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,330 views136 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Video

Жутковатое зрелище, согласитесь, но очень любопытное! Даже мысль о том, что проглоченная еда продолжает шевелиться и издавать звуки в желудке, заставляет содрогнуться, но лягушкам норм, они привыкли. Впрочем, когда эта жаба получила на обед цикаду – одно из самых шумных насекомых на планете, то тут и она слегка обалдела. Цикада продолжила отважно трещать и сражаться за жизнь в ненасытном желудке земноводного. Правда…

❤52🔥31😱25👍18👀5👏3🌭1😁1

2 Sept 2026, 07:00 UTC≈1,380 views25 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Это ужасно смешно, когда человек так рассказывает про изнанку своей профессии. Особенно, если человек — турагент. Люба руководит турагентством уже 17 лет. Историй про клиентов и их отдых у нее накопилось на целую книжку. А может не одну: комедия, хоррор и семейная драма. 📌Зачем Люба всех туристов-новобрачных спрашивает про колодец? 📌Четыре причины не посещать аквариум в Хургаде 📌Паспорт, притягивающий богатство Важ…

👍13❤5🔥4💊1🤝1😁1

1 Sept 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,630 views191 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Можно подумать, что какой-то шутник обработал видео с идущей птичкой, заставив её танцевать, чтобы мы все посмеялись. Посмеяться мы, конечно, можем, однако тут всё взаправду, и птичка время от времени пританцовывает совершенно самостоятельно. Зовётся этот пернатый вальдшнепом. Вальдшнепами так-то величают целый род птиц, состоящий из восьми видов, но широко известны только два из них – наш, евразийский вальдшнеп, со…

❤100🔥43😁21👍16🥰6😍3👏2

1 Sept 2026, 07:23 UTC≈1,790 views231 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Если ты очень-очень маленький, то едва ли не каждый встречный-поперечный хочет тебя съесть, так что прикинуться мёртвым – иногда самый действенный способ защиты из всех возможных. Но это не тот случай, ведь перед вами карликовый мангуст. Да, с его 20 сантиметрами длины и 250 граммами веса он без преувеличения является самым маленьким хищным зверем Африки, но он всё-таки мангуст, младший братишка храброго Рикки-Тикки…

❤112🔥59🥰24👍21😁10✍3👏2

31 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC≈1,920 views203 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Поклонение солнцу? Можем, умеем, практикуем! Вы только посмотрите, как кайфует этот рыжий вари – один из крупнейших лемуров Мадагаскара. Крупнейший из лемуров весит поменьше наших домашних кошек – всего около 3,5 кг, поэтому замёрзнуть для него – дело плёвое. Ночью в кронах деревьев, где спят вари, бывает довольно прохладно, и по утрам лемуры частенько принимают такие уморительные позы. Почему именно так? А потому,…

🥰86❤60🔥29👍22👏3😁3

31 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,830 views164 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Кто там? Р-р-ринго Стар-р-р! Не верите? А вы послушайте! Соло на барабанах для вас исполнил совершенно чудесный австралийский птиц по имени чёрный какаду – единственный представитель рода пальмовых какаду. И как положено единственному и австралийскому – птица он очень необычная. Во-первых, здоровенная – росточком 70-80 см, весом более килограмма, а как расправит метровые угольно-чёрные крылья, сверкнёт красными ще…

❤69🔥45😁23👍19🥰5👏3

31 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC≈1,760 views85 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @thelastdinoVideo

Главный трикстер из мира птиц

🔥55👍15❤14👏1

30 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC≈2,030 views170 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Video

Впечатлились размерами насекомины? Да уж, тут есть чем впечатлиться. Но если вы не включили звук при просмотре видео, то непременно просмотрите его вновь со звуком, потому что главная фишка этого жучары вовсе не размеры – жуки и побольше бывают – а ангельский голосок. Зовётся это удивительное создание Batocera rufomaculata, и относится оно к семейству усачей, роду Batocera, распространенному в тропических и субтроп…

🔥91❤33👍30👀8👏2🥰2😱2🤗1

29 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC≈2,190 views181 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Photo

Снова суббота, а это значит, что я несу вам четыре факта, которыми удивляю школьников на уроках биологии. Всем известно, что муравьи вступают во взаимовыгодные отношения с тлёй и выращивают грибы. А сегодняшняя подборка посвящена менее известным, но не менее интересным симбиотическим союзам муравьёв. #школьные_факты

🔥99👍48❤21👏10🥰2✍1

28 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC≈2,250 views194 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

А это кто такой перед нами, летучая мышь или всё же летучая кошка? Ни то ни другое! Это летучая лисица из семейства крыланов – впрочем, моется она и впрямь как кошка. Ну а как ей ещё мыться, не в воду же прыгать, чтобы крылья выкупать, в самом деле. А вот язычком – самое то. После ночной трапезы на перепонках остаются липкие следы фруктов, пыльца, мусор и – о, ужас! – всяческие эктопаразиты. Всё это подлежит немедле…

❤105🔥42👍24🥰19👏3😘1

28 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈2,150 views168 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Так-так, и что это такое делает эта странная ящерка – не жвачку же жуёт, в самом деле? Нет, она всего лишь пьёт. Но что она пьёт? Неужели ту капельку воды, что упала ей на голову? Да, её, а также её редких соседок. Перед вами, друзья, животина по имени молох – австралийская ящерица из семейства агамовых. И как вся австралийская живность, молох – товарищ с причудами. Во-первых, он не умеет пить как все, но тут не ег…

🔥101❤31👍29👏4🥰3

Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @ZametkiUchitelya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@ZametkiUchitelya edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЗУБ: записки учителя биологии” (@ZametkiUchitelya), 11,832 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZametkiUchitelya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.