Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -114. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,852–4,110 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 11:19
3,966
-30
13 Sept 2026, 12:00
3,996
-35
9 Sept 2026, 14:35
4,031
+108
4 Sept 2026, 15:56
3,923
+41
1 Sept 2026, 06:14
3,882
-22
29 Aug 2026, 12:13
3,904
-30
26 Aug 2026, 09:04
3,934
-27
23 Aug 2026, 08:06
3,961
-29
19 Aug 2026, 14:46
3,990
-18
16 Aug 2026, 16:29
4,008
-19
13 Aug 2026, 11:28
4,027
-14
10 Aug 2026, 20:38
4,041
-39
8 Aug 2026, 00:22
4,080
no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:22
4,080
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
445 reactions across 17 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5454306796007088446
445
100.0%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 445 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Многие пишут «Зава каким впн пользуешься?»
На стримах всегда отвечал что не пользуюсь, но с недавних пор время от времени приходится использовать.
И могу с радостью вам посоветовать именно этот впн, всё охуенно и чётко работает.
Промокод - Zava
VPN - @telega_vpn_robot
МЫ ЗАПУСТИЛИ МЕГА РОЗЫГРЫШ!
Мы запустили масштабный розыгрыш совместно с известными вам людьми, которых вы могли видеть в разных социальных сетях или даже в различных игровых режимах.
Поэтому мы приняли решение выдать 7 NFT на каждое место по одному призу !
1 место NFT @verboil_4554
2 место NFT @whizee
3 место NFT @pokemoshabs
4 место NFT @zava_bs
5 место NFT @hqdrenat
6 место NFT @kor_898
7 место NFT @weeeeei…
custom 545430679600708844616
Signed Best Random Bot 🎁 [Конкурсный бот для розыгрышей | Рандомайзер]
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
На данный момент ещё не уверен что именно делать в игре, очень много отраслей в которых я могу сейчас развиваться в плане игры. Сразу говорю пушить общие как это делал я в 2023-2024 я точно не буду, в связи с тем что у меня есть любимая девушка и работа, следовательно времени у меня не особо много.
Я вижу 3 возможных исхода
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ZavaBS49. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ZavaBS49 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@tojibestkingshowdown named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
будка алекза @alekzz03 · 100,152 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 14 August 2026
BEZSMERTNY 💍 @bezsmertny_bs · 262,463 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 10 August 2026
Gene's Land @gene_land · 46,698 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 26 August 2026
Aza2 @aza2aza · 25,533 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 14 September 2026
CrySoul @crysoul · 29,668 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 7 September 2026
Rost Lairs @Rost_Lairs · 238,696 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 August 2026
MaksGo @MaksGo_YT · 35,952 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 1 September 2026
Brawl Stars Datamines | BSD @bsdatamines · 449,794 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 9 August 2026
Hiko @hikoded · 115,601 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 13 August 2026
Brawl Stars Stik @BrawlStarsStik · 29,480 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 8 September 2026
Моды Бравл Старс | Mods Brawl Stars @all_brawlmods · 40,011 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 29 August 2026
Magic Brawl — официальный канал @magics_ru · 63,511 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 21 August 2026
FLYING MINER | BS @flyingminerr · 53,810 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 22 August 2026
Mercy Brawl Stars @mercybrawlnews · 25,415 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 September 2026
YT | Эль Ниньо ТВ @elninotv · 34,155 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 3 September 2026
Cleopatra YouTube @cleopatra_youtube · 43,735 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zava 🏀🧡” (@ZavaBS49), 3,966 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZavaBS49.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.