Channel
@ZedRabbit_tattoo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
203subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002655672774 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZedRabbit_tattoo |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZedRabbit_tattoo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 203 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:21 | 206 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 208 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 207 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 209 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 207 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 207 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
15 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5345904561645166735 | 11 | 73.3% | |
| custom 5462900415681034593 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| custom 5257965419792205499 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| custom 5283105267829997242 | 1 | 6.67% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ребятки〰 Так как мы с вами активно растем, в ближайшее время будем менять наш тг и инсту(да, кто не знал, у нас есть инста)💊 В команде появился новый творческий человечек, скоро познакомлю вас с ней. А пока, ждите легендарный дропчик P.s. по секрету, заводим тикток, где будут много смешных и интересных видосиков⭐️ Люблю вас, спасибо, что выбираете меня, как мастера 🫶
custom 53459045616451667355
My love🤩
custom 53459045616451667356
Ответ: голодные игры
t.me/questianonbot?start=1023924321b Задавай любые вопросы 🎀
Кидай ответ сюда
Я теперь хочу набить этот эскиз (один из моих любимых фильмов)☀
Угадай на какой фильм отсылка😉
Девочки, поздравляю 🤩
🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. наська🧚♂️ (@naskatopu) 2. anastasavd (@anastasavd) ✔️Проверить результаты
Signed Randomize Bot 🎲 [Рандомайзер]
И так, до конца конкурса осталось буквально пару часов🦄 Те, кто ещё не успел поучаствовать- тыкай на «участвую»
Осталось 3️⃣дня до конца конкурса!!!
custom 54629004156810345932custom 52579654197922054991custom 52831052678299972421
🆔🆔🆔🆔🆔🆔🆔🆔🆔🆔
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ZedRabbit_tattoo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ZedRabbit_Tattoo” (@ZedRabbit_tattoo), 203 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZedRabbit_tattoo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.