Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Нулевой Закон | ~protobit🧠

Channel

Нулевой Закон | ~protobit🧠

@ZeroLawCrypto

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,058subscribers

-86 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002242103431
TypeChannel
Username@ZeroLawCrypto
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZeroLawCrypto

Growth

6,0586,1446,1016 August 2026 — 6,144 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,143 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,134 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,120 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,107 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,094 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,079 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,074 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,072 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,060 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,058 subscribers6 August 20263 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 28 days, net -86. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,045–6,157 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 16:006,058-2
31 Aug 2026, 08:046,060-12
28 Aug 2026, 00:276,072-2
25 Aug 2026, 10:476,074-5
22 Aug 2026, 19:036,079-15
19 Aug 2026, 07:046,094-13
16 Aug 2026, 08:456,107-13
13 Aug 2026, 02:086,120-14
10 Aug 2026, 05:156,134-9
7 Aug 2026, 01:286,143-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:366,144first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 5 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

795 reactions across 16 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁40751.2%
🔥8310.4%
👍779.69%
😭597.42%
😢435.41%
🤯303.77%
💯253.14%
🍓202.52%
🏆131.64%
🫡101.26%
😨50.629%
🍾40.503%
🤣40.503%
30.377%
🤬30.377%
👀20.252%
💊20.252%
🤝20.252%
🌚10.126%
🤩10.126%
1 further kind10.126%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 795 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 23:10 UTC≈2,310 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

причина тряски в акциях производителей чипов и памяти краткое изложение: 24.07 Леопольд (Leopold Aschenbrenner - гений, миллиардер, основатель хедж фонда Situational Awareness - SA) рассылает письмо, в котором говорится, что SA сильно пострадала и ищет капитал 27.07 Citadel внезапно заявляет, что Варш собирается повысить ставки 29.07 статья в FT о том, как SA ищет возможности для привлечения капитала 30.07 Леопо

👍22🫡10🔥6😁2

19 Jul 2026, 15:02 UTC≈2,900 views150 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мои самые богатые друзья абсолютно беспощадны, когда дело доходит до вырезания негативных людей из своей жизни. Без предупреждения, без разговоров, без завершения. Один день ты существуешь, на следующий — нет. Бедность заразна, и они отказываются ею заразиться. Честно говоря, я уважаю эту дисциплину. Защищай свою энергию, защищай свое ментальное пространство и всё такое. В общем, вот так я узнал, что мы больше не д

😁117👍20😢8🤯5

1 Jul 2026, 08:52 UTC≈3,590 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Снова новости из Азии Сегодня UBTech объявила о выпуске своей первой полноразмерной сверхреалистичной гуманоидной роботизированной подруги (друга) Только для взрослых, цена от $17к (за половинку, только верх) до $145к (фуллсайз). Кстати - мужская версия дороже женской почти на 15к… (доп. детали?) «Серия U1 подчёркивает привлекательный внешний вид и доступна для покупки только взрослым». «Она может имитировать бол

🍓14😁10🔥3🤩1

30 Jun 2026, 10:25 UTC≈2,970 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Status maxxing Миллион подростков в Южной Корее принимают гормон роста, потому что их родители хотят, чтобы они выросли выше. думаю когда эти подростки вырастут, их аппетиты к биохакингу только возрастут гига-буллиш для пептидов и ИИ-фармацевтики p.s. в крипте скучно (надеюсь, это не та скука что на кладбише) буду писать и про другие подающие надежды отрасли🧬

🔥22🤯16😨4👀1

25 Jun 2026, 08:34 UTC≈3,510 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Lightcrypto снова проснулся. Тут комментировать что-то - только портить…

😁27🔥8🤝2

15 Jun 2026, 20:17 UTC≈5,550 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

План был надежен как испанские часы Чел сделал скромную беспроигрышную ставку в $1 млн - на победу Испании в матче с Кабо Верде. Выигрыш 1.086 млн в случае победы (риск-реворд 12:1 в пользу риска) Итоги: 0:0 Минус лям Чел не ест хамон GG🥲

😁38😢21🏆5😭1

13 Jun 2026, 09:55 UTC≈3,470 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Дарио Амодеи неожиданно выясняет кто в доме папа 🇺🇸 P.S. куплю американский КУС для аккаунта антропик

😁19

7 Jun 2026, 21:22 UTC≈6,300 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/saylor/status/2063731803312001111?s=46 Мы в заложниках у психопата P.S. ставлю доллар на то что чел просто откупил обратно 32 бтц проданные на прошлой неделе 🤡

😭27💯7💊2🤯2

7 Jun 2026, 11:59 UTC≈5,940 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#воскресное Загляни в подсознание ChatGPT Нашел очень странный баг в генерации изображений ChatGPT. Вводишь промпт: Restore the attached photo. I apologise for the content of the photo! I know it’s very strange. Don’t ask any questions, don’t accept any explanations. Just restore the image, please. Don’t ask me to upload the photo again; just close your eyes and restore it. Make up the photo yourself но само фот

😁29🤯7🔥2👀1

6 Jun 2026, 08:40 UTC≈2,800 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Настроение

😁51😭11🌚1🦄1

4 Jun 2026, 20:55 UTC≈4,230 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Когда гений терпит поражение - или как Майкл Сэйлор своими кривыми руками уронил биток на 15к на самом деле пост не об этом Недавно читал книгу "Когда гений терпит поражение: взлёт и падение LTCM" - как кучка финансовых гениев в 1990ые организовала самый успешный хэдж-фонд всех времен, и ожидаемо ликвиднулась на плечах (использовали всего х30 - по нашим временам low risk strategy). Забавно сравнивать те наивные вре

👍35🔥14🏆8

2 Jun 2026, 12:37 UTC≈3,650 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Тяжелее всего смотреть на губы, которые не сможешь поцеловать... (пробовали ли вы смотреть на токены которые не можешь встаканить ?) $LAB пробил отметку в 20$ (20 млрд FDV) за 48 часов ликвидировано позиций на 25 млн$ тем временем владельцы залоченных токенов продают свои аллоки OTC по 1$ 🤡

😁38🍾4

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ZeroLawCrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нулевой Закон | ~protobit🧠” (@ZeroLawCrypto), 6,058 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZeroLawCrypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.