Channel
@ZucchiniMarrow
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
43subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001926361467 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZucchiniMarrow |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZucchiniMarrow |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 43 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 42 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 42 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
71 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 50 | 70.4% | |
| 💋 | 11 | 15.5% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 9.86% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 2.82% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 1.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ZucchiniMarrow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 April 2026 to 13 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ура, можно выложить! Результат участия в хуманизации сладостей😋 Хочу в работах делать больше заполненности, неуютно от пустот на рисунках. Пока красил, девушка в ухо кричала "СИСЬКИ". Нормально ревновать к собственному рисунку? З.Ы. видос ивента тут
❤3
Ещё сунулся в конкурс в этом шопе, нужно было нарисовать в своём стиле девчонок. Чем дольше рисовал, тем больше понимал, насколько много хочется поменять в оригинале. Но орги конкурса уже успели к какому-то челу прикопаться за иной оттенок волос, так что я решил максимально не рыпаться – только руку сдвинул у шатенки :/
❤2
А суть ивента была в том, чтобы стать дедушкой😋 Дали, значит, моему сыну зелёнчатому великолепную Даму-овечку от @ZZChannel_DrawZZ, а яркому пришельцу от @grikkikiki – моего сынка. А потом мы все дружно принимали роды. Рожал, надеюсь, не Зелёный... Внучка ушла к её бабушке, а внучок будет со мной, дедом, жить
❤2
Для участия в одном из ивентов нужно было отрисовать развёрку перса, а я такое делал впервые в жизни. Выбрал для эксперимента – Зелёного. Он тут где-то был уже... По характеру он чисто твой личный бизнес-коуч, который нассыт тебе в уши, заберёт последние деньги и не испытает сострадания. А ещё внешка не базовая, для того ивента идеально подходил. Кажется, у него было имя, но я его уже несколько лет зову просто Зелёны…
❤3
Макак елда в отпуске, наслаждается летней жарой. А вы? Спасибо, дорогому Kabachkok за этот рисунок по заказу (идея авторская).
❤2
А ещё у меня был заказ и какоооой!!!!! Очень жду комикс с этим крутышом
❤1
А вот такого хайпового парня нарисовала потрясная Мари по моему мудборду. Очень понравились итоги ивента, хех
❤4
Я стал посвободнее, ура! Теперь буду рассказывать, чем я таким занимался всё это время (помимо работы и сессии). Вписался в ивент от Джоза с тайным персонажем. Каждый художник придумал свой мудборд, их перемешали и раздали. Вышел вот такой нарцисс без кристаллов. Ну и моя часть видео с объяснениями всякого про процесс работы. Ну а полное видео со всеми ребятами тут: https://youtu.be/t5I3HdcxIII?si=rDAZvUl1t3iVELLz
❤4
Рисовал на ивент по хумке. Странный был, если честно. Почти никакой свободы в реализации, двоих даже исключили. Потихоньку разгребаюсь. Осталось дожить две недели практики, экзамен..подработка....
❤7
Ъ, Меня очень вдохновил арт. Даже то, что на отрисовку было всего пару дней не остановило. Всё было сделано в попыхах и в последние часы, что очень печально. Ощущение было, словно на экзамене сижу. Но пока работается надо работать 😋
❤8💋2🕊2
🪦🤩🦷🦷🦷🦷🦷🤩🪦 ☺️т ☺️ларелис 🪦🪦🪦 🪦🪦☺️TIYS - конкурс, где люди должны нарисовать картинку в своем стиле. 🪦🪦 🤩☺️🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🤩 🪦Подписка на этот канал Репост поста в тгк который будете пиарить. (Если нет тгк, в пиар чат/3 друзьям) 🪦Написать под этот пост "участвую" и скинуть скрин репоста. 🪦Готовую работу с файлом скинуть под пост ниже и написать юз вашего тгк. 🪦Кстати детали и реф Калитрикс в пол…
Сам арт 😋 Кепарик классный вышел, кепариком доволен :D А торт мне крови попил Upd: Конкурс проходил у ENGINE SHOP
❤10💋2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ZucchiniMarrow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 159,591 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ZucchiniMarrow named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рецепт кабачкового рагу из кабачка” (@ZucchiniMarrow), 43 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZucchiniMarrow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.