Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for A1TGBOT

Channel

A1TGBOT

@a1tgbot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

23,506subscribers

-783 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003056289481
TypeChannel
Username@a1tgbot
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/a1tgbot

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

23,50624,29323,899.57 August 2026 — 24,289 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,289 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,293 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,272 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,252 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,238 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,224 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,223 subscribers15 August 2026 — 24,193 subscribers16 August 2026 — 24,151 subscribers17 August 2026 — 24,136 subscribers18 August 2026 — 24,130 subscribers19 August 2026 — 24,112 subscribers20 August 2026 — 24,099 subscribers22 August 2026 — 24,074 subscribers23 August 2026 — 24,039 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,990 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,942 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,919 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,906 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,893 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,864 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,842 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,804 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,756 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,734 subscribers4 September 2026 — 23,709 subscribers6 September 2026 — 23,665 subscribers10 September 2026 — 23,564 subscribers12 September 2026 — 23,506 subscribers7 August 202612 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 36 days, net -783. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,388–24,411 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 06:3823,506-58
10 Sept 2026, 00:3923,564-101
6 Sept 2026, 14:4223,665-44
4 Sept 2026, 04:4123,709-25
2 Sept 2026, 19:0423,734-22
1 Sept 2026, 16:2823,756-48
31 Aug 2026, 19:5523,804-38
30 Aug 2026, 18:4623,842-22
29 Aug 2026, 18:0523,864-29
28 Aug 2026, 19:1423,893-13
27 Aug 2026, 22:4623,906-13
27 Aug 2026, 01:4923,919-23
26 Aug 2026, 04:0823,942-48
25 Aug 2026, 02:2923,990-49
23 Aug 2026, 15:4324,039-35
22 Aug 2026, 00:3524,074-25
20 Aug 2026, 16:2424,099-13
19 Aug 2026, 17:2324,112-18
18 Aug 2026, 20:2624,130-6
17 Aug 2026, 23:1324,136first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.54%
avg views ÷ 23,506 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,070
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.763%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held29 (3 July 202631 August 2026)
Views total7,466
Reactions total57
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 58s
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

176 reactions across 28 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12973.3%
😢73.98%
🔥63.41%
👍52.84%
😎52.84%
😨52.84%
😁42.27%
🗿31.70%
😐31.70%
👏21.14%
🕊21.14%
🆒10.568%
💘10.568%
😭10.568%
😱10.568%
🥰10.568%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 176 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC394 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Link 🔗 : @Ludoking_hackbot Ludo king 👑 Watch video carefully

6

28 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC716 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Give me idea or Paid work for android app , website , api , tool somthing crazy @ai3bo

4

26 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC946 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Like milra hai na daily 50 request limmite hai to jaldi jaldi daily le liya karo warna full ho jayega 😁

7

25 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC≈1,100 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Fixed free fire like bot ✅ Soon emote play also and many more function ! Jaldi jaldi Lelo Likes free hai abhi Bot : @FreeFirelikbot

5😐3

25 Aug 2026, 04:14 UTC≈1,060 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Iska danc3 d3kho 🤤 https://1024terabox.com/s/1h4K2V0AAy26t37vTtc4kew

1

24 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC≈1,070 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Need FF like,emote play,spem friends request etc back ? With extra features like craftland followers?

16🔥3🥰1😱1

15 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC≈2,180 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Happy Independence Day!🩷

9👍1

11 Aug 2026, 06:44 UTC≈2,590 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

😄 Non r00t Full safe Config 🗃️ 🧡Features : • Ant1na Location • AIMBOT  🎚 FF max apk : Click 🎚 Setup Video : Click 🎚 File 🗃️ : Click

8😢7

10 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC≈2,230 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

22 m1n 💀 https://1024terabox.com/s/1hX6zV-4PZQUNDnhXbVxxBw Powered by @PvtChannelbot Powered by @Bright_futurewala_bot

2

3 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC≈2,860 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🤠 Per Gmail Account Earn ₹15 1 Gmail = ₹15 || 10 Gmail = ₹150 ✈️ Bot Link : https://t.me/GmailFarmerBot?start=8800158361 Per Gmail >> 0.15$ ( 15₹ ) Min Withdrawal >> 0.09$ ( 8₹ ) ✍️ Jitna Gmail Banaoge Utna Kama Paoge Already Verified Hai 100% Viral Hoga Baki Sab Sare Log Lag Jao Kaam Per Balance 3 Days Mein Wallet Mein Add Hoga Withdrawal ❤️ V3rification prob :- Click

5💘1

2 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC≈2,170 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Aùn+y w1th b0y 💀 Part 1 :- https://1024terabox.com/s/177lf0gXPkOpOCCvSnW600A Part 2 :- https://1024terabox.com/s/1s2_You44Zl_ZsdIVr_rgWQ Powered by @PvtChannelbot

4

31 Jul 2026, 04:48 UTC≈2,230 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Sp1d3r men Br@nd n3w Day 👇👇 Full Hd - https://t.me/spiderm3n_brand_new_day

🆒1

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @a1tgbot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Jul 2026, 02:59 UTCAnonymous Poll165 voters

Vote for next content 😁

  1. Carrom pool 🇵🇹hemk27%
  2. P0werful b0mber lifetime free 💀50%
  3. Prank New vir#s 🦠 😁25%
  4. Free Fire R00t hemk 🤣32%

The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“A1TGBOT” (@a1tgbot), 23,506 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/a1tgbot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.