Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 宝安 坪洲95 🉑🉑新频道

Channel

宝安 坪洲95 🉑🉑新频道

@aKeke885996

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,724subscribers

+1,150 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003259829555
TypeChannel
Username@aKeke885996
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/aKeke885996

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5741,7241,1497 August 2026 — 574 subscribers7 August 2026 — 576 subscribers8 August 2026 — 576 subscribers15 August 2026 — 599 subscribers21 August 2026 — 620 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,679 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,677 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,691 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,699 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,712 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,716 subscribers24 September 2026 — 1,724 subscribers7 August 202624 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 48 days, net +1,150. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 402–1,897 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Sept 2026, 21:161,724+8
16 Sept 2026, 12:221,716+4
12 Sept 2026, 16:391,712+13
8 Sept 2026, 20:561,699+8
3 Sept 2026, 06:451,691+14
31 Aug 2026, 07:051,677-2
28 Aug 2026, 15:341,679+1,059
21 Aug 2026, 05:04620+21
15 Aug 2026, 03:07599+23
8 Aug 2026, 03:30576no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:28576+2
7 Aug 2026, 17:37574first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤342.9%
🥰228.6%
💩114.3%
🤮114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,560 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎀 可可 地区:#宝安 #坪洲 课费:500环保 简介:26 / 165cm / 50kg 私聊:@Keke885996 频道:@aKeke885996 标签:#女友感 #御姐 #手势验证 #环保 #皮肤白 #骚 🍥 查看评价 · 撰写评价

❤2🥰2🤮1

7 Jul 2026, 08:30 UTC≈1,630 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

艺名 : 可可(环保) 地区:#宝安 #坪洲 标签: 六九 御姐 漫游 六九 环保95 冷白皮 消费:500/45分钟P 900/90分钟PP 联系:@Keke885996 频道:@aKeke885996

💩1

1 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC≈1,850 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#可可 已在老友会验证上榜 ❗️点击👉 @szxglyhglBot 进入机器人查阅老师榜。 t.me/szxglyhglBot?start=-1002640036076 没有群主只有玩家,纯交流纯分享群 ,分享优质老师,发掘优秀新人。

15 Jun 2026, 04:40 UTC≈2,700 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

深圳榨汁大队报告区:https://t.me/szzzbgq #宝安 #可可 【验证留名】:花间壹壶酒 【验证时间】:6月14日 【修车水费】:500 【服务内容】:95口爆、毒龙、69、乳交等 【颜值身材】:9分,身材苗条,PP很翘 【凶器罩杯】:C 【体验细节】:雨天出击 也算得上是真爱,还好没失望,地方好找 就在地铁口(不太好停车)。进口看到是本人 身材很好,马上交了水费,就去洗澡。洗完澡开始做服务,先是B面,一条柔软的小舌头从上到下,接触到菊花的那一刻,差点被秒了,不要太舒服,妹子的毒龙技术一流。而后又体验了69、乳交等项目,都很赞!最后在镜子前完成了发射,爽的灵魂出窍。妹子服务态度很好,过程中很配合,这个价位做95项目,直接性价比拉满 无脑冲!只可惜妹子只接环保 不开大课,少了很多乐趣。一定会返 【事逼行为】:无 【优点缺点】:服务态度好 【推荐程度】:9.5分 /10满分,0颜值,0身材,0服务,0态度,0性价比(…

❤1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @aKeke885996. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“宝安 坪洲95 🉑🉑新频道” (@aKeke885996), 1,724 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aKeke885996.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.