Меня зовут Андрей, и это мой канал. Здесь я делюсь своим житием, мыслями и историями, а также рассказываю о новостях, которые меня зацепили или вдохновили.
Личка: @generror
Created
21 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 516–518 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Sept 2026, 13:22
517
no change
13 Sept 2026, 12:47
517
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 17 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.0%
avg views ÷ 517 subscribers
Avg views / post
98.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
10.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held
7 (17 April 2026 – 22 August 2026)
Views total
98
Reactions total
10
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,600
Videos
≈737
Links
≈488
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 18s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
113 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5420315771991497307
47
41.6%
❤
46
40.7%
custom 5431449001532594346
8
7.08%
💔
8
7.08%
custom 5370953476635368811
3
2.65%
custom 5370892118732576453
1
0.885%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
У нас было семь свободных дней, три лодки, шесть палаток, десять спальников, три котелка, горелки, продукты, верёвки, карабины, гермомешки, карта, сгущёнка, и куча техники для съемки приключения. Не то чтобы нам всё это было нужно для недельного похода, но как только собираешь серьёзную экспедицию, хочется тащить всё, что не приколочено.
Мы сходили на ледник Иган, забирались на водопады, штурмовали горы, проплыли пр…
🤩Люблю я эти все истории с цифрами, которые умеют шаги считать, тренировки и даже пульс на колбасе. Очевидно, что там есть расхождения с реальностью, но какую-то порцию интереса и мотивации они вкидывают, ну и хотя бы количество тренировок не нужно в блокнот записывать.
Итак, с 1 января на спортивных полях удалось:
⚡️Провести 120 тренировок
☀️Нашагать 1 420 000 – это 1 047 км по приборам
☀️Пробежать 323 км, улучшить…
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @a_priora. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Дмитрий Артюхов @artyukhov_da · 25,877 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 September 2026
ЯМАЛ. Официально @YANAO_official · 24,217 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“априо́ри” (@a_priora), 517 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/a_priora.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
