Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
20 measurements spanning 82 days, net -77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,953–8,058 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Oct 2026, 00:05
7,969
+4
25 Oct 2026, 13:16
7,965
-2
22 Oct 2026, 19:20
7,967
-6
19 Oct 2026, 13:40
7,973
-2
16 Oct 2026, 05:40
7,975
-3
12 Oct 2026, 20:21
7,978
-8
6 Oct 2026, 16:58
7,986
-1
29 Sept 2026, 09:18
7,987
-12
14 Sept 2026, 20:17
7,999
-1
11 Sept 2026, 08:39
8,000
-6
6 Sept 2026, 06:02
8,006
-3
2 Sept 2026, 00:34
8,009
-13
30 Aug 2026, 01:32
8,022
-6
27 Aug 2026, 09:44
8,028
-1
24 Aug 2026, 03:08
8,029
-10
20 Aug 2026, 07:28
8,039
-1
14 Aug 2026, 06:36
8,040
-5
8 Aug 2026, 00:54
8,045
-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:31
8,046
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:27
8,046
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
39 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
21
53.8%
👎
9
23.1%
👍
5
12.8%
👏
3
7.69%
👻
1
2.56%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
و كأن بيل غيتس يقول ( الأسوء لم يأتي بعد .... ) !!
في مقال مطول نُشر في أواخر أغسطس 2026 على مدونته الرسمية (GatesNotes) وفي مقابلات صحفية مع وسائل إعلام تقنية، أصدر بيل غيتس تحذيراً شديد اللهجة بشأن القفزات المتسارعة للذكاء الاصطناعي، واصفاً المرحلة القادمة بأنها "واحدة من أكثر الفترات اضطراباً في تاريخ البشرية".
أبرز نقطتين اختصر بهما المشهد:
"إما أن يكون الذكاء الاصطناعي أعظم أداة لتحقيق المساواة تم اختراعها على …
الم اخبركم مرارا و تكرارا بان الذكاء الاصطناعي غير البحث الاكاديمي تماما !!
مجلة Nature المرموقة المصنفة Q1 تنشر بحثا ناري من العيار الثقيل هذا البحث يكشف أن الذكاء الاصطناعي اكتشف اخطاءا علميا في اوراق علمية منشورة في مجلات Q1 !! و ان الذكاء الاصطناعي اكتشف اخطاء في قواعد بيانات و جداول قياسية تستخدم منذ 75 سنة !!
*******************************************************
عنوان المقال:
"وكلاء الذكاء الاصطناعي يفح…
نصائح للمستقبل
كن مثل ترامب ...
ترامب ليس مجنون كما يعتقد الحمقى ! ترامب يتصرف بطبيعته الحقيقية كرئيس لاعظم و اقوى دولة في العالم اذا قالت لبقية الدول كونوا فحتما سيكونون !!
امريكا دولة عظمى في جميع المجالات لهذا هي ليست بحاجة للعالم لكن العالم بحاجة لامريكا و لا يستطيع العيش بدونها !!
أمريكا ليست ملزمة ان تجامل و تنافق و تداهن و تجبر بخاطر الدول الضعيفة خاصة لو كانت هذه الدول فاشلة و فاسدة مثل العرب
لهذا ستلاحظ ان …
نصائح للمستقبل
في الحرب الإيرانية الامريكية لماذا لم يسقط النظام الإيراني !! لماذا لم ينشق أي مسؤول إيراني عن النظام ! لماذا لم يخرج الشعب الإيراني مطالبا بتدخل خارجي ! لماذا لم نشاهد مواطن إيراني واحد و هو يرفع لافتة كتب فيها شكرا نتنيايهو كما حدث في سوريا و شكرا ساركوزي كما في ليبيا ! لماذا لم نشاهد أعيان القبائل الإيرانية يطالبون بتدخل الناتو و يصفون طائراته بانها طيور الابابيل و ان الرسول لو كان حي لشارك في خلف…
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله و بركاتة
لاجل دعم و مساندة و مساعدة الطلبة و البحاث نعلن عن انطلاق مجموعة تلغرام مخصصة فقط لتقديم الاستشارات و النصائح و الارشادات و المناقشات في المجالات الاتية
1- كشف و معالجة كتابة الذكاء الاصطناعي
2- كشف و معالجة كتابة الذكاء الاصطناعي المعالج مسبقا
3- كشف و معالجة الانتحال / التشابه
4- كشف و معالجة موثوقية المراجع المستخدمة في كتابة البحث
5- كشف و معالجة دقة توثيق النص بالمرجع
6- تقديم م…
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @aaa1977aa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
وزارة النفط العراقية @ministry_of_oil · 19,060 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 October 2026
المكتبة الهندسية @t3leemkhrbaa · 23,138 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 September 2026
Drilling Manual @drillingmanual2 · 30,489 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
كورسات (دورات)اندرو تيت مترجمة للعربية @tatespeach1_0 · 18,567 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 3 October 2026
Jobs & Advices @Jobs_Advices · 19,399 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 October 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة المهندس خالد الساحلي📚” (@aaa1977aa), 7,969 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aaa1977aa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.