Posted without readable text
custom 522921468107951262315custom 52287672657463533758custom 52289988761527603743

Channel
@aaaaaaaaaaafffffrrrrr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,183subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001694281503 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aaaaaaaaaaafffffrrrrr |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aaaaaaaaaaafffffrrrrr |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 1,183 | -2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 1,185 | +1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:55 | 1,184 | -5 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 1,189 | +3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 1,186 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 1,185 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 1,183 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:09 | 1,184 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 1,186 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 1,190 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 1,192 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 1,197 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 1,188 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 1,188 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
375 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5229214681079512623 | 246 | 65.6% | |
| custom 5228767265746353375 | 64 | 17.1% | |
| custom 5228998876152760374 | 53 | 14.1% | |
| custom 5231283309127957046 | 12 | 3.20% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 375 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aaaaaaaaaaafffffrrrrr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
custom 522921468107951262315custom 52287672657463533758custom 52289988761527603743
Posted without readable text
custom 522921468107951262335custom 522899887615276037412custom 522876726574635337510
Давайте конкурс проведем, давно же не было🤍 Пишите, о чем мечтаете из CINTA в комментариях под этим постом! Коментарии засчитываются только от участников, которые принимают искреннее нативное участие в жизни бренда. Что это может быть: пишите свои мысли по темам постов выше, ставьте сердечки на посты в этом телеграмм, телеграмм бренда и странице в запрещенной сети и уже 10 августа рандомно выберем победителя
custom 522921468107951262348custom 522876726574635337519custom 522899887615276037414
В это место я мечтала попасть год. Нереальное скопление японского фарфора, хрусталя. Если будите на Пхукете -обязательно заезжайте в Japan outlet. Можно купить старую красивую мебель, люстру, пианино-если бы только у меня здесь была вилла) некоторая посуда ищет на развес, что-то с ценниками. Что привезти? Фарфоровые чашечки, вазу, пепельницу. Наводите на клеймо, делаете фото и загружаете в ИИ-так делали мы, чтобы не…
custom 522921468107951262343custom 522876726574635337510custom 52289988761527603744
Очередные тайские заметки сегодня таковы: должен ли руководитель или собственномученик бизнеса подстраиваться под коллектив и чем грозит не увольнять вовремя тех, кто тебе не подходит? Начнем с того, что коллектив для среднего бизнеса это не просто коллеги, выполнявшие задачи. От коллектива в небольшом бизнесе дохрена и больше всего зависит. Каждая правильно и вовлечено работающая единица приносит общий результат -к…
custom 522921468107951262341custom 522876726574635337517custom 52289988761527603748
Я снова в любимой Азии. Первые дни не могла наесться фруктами-с чего то появилась огромная страсть к дуриану. А я пробовала его всего лишь раз в Китае (но видимо с правильными людьми) Не могла никак наесться том-яма, напиться кокосов. А самая желанная покупка была очень простой -сланцы в ярких цветах. Вот так вот жизнь меня помотала со всеми этими вашими обязательствами, ответственностью и многозадачностью, что в по…
custom 522921468107951262364custom 522899887615276037412custom 523128330912795704612
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @aaaaaaaaaaafffffrrrrr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“РАДИ БОГА, ОТВЕТЬТЕ!” (@aaaaaaaaaaafffffrrrrr), 1,183 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aaaaaaaaaaafffffrrrrr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.