Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for !!!.ф.иИи.ЛиАаА.л.!!!???

Channel

!!!.ф.иИи.ЛиАаА.л.!!!???

@aaaarrrpaaa2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,204subscribers

-339 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002405212976
TypeChannel
Username@aaaarrrpaaa2
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/aaaarrrpaaa2

Growth

17,20417,54317,373.512 August 2026 — 17,543 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,543 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,529 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,499 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,484 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,463 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,452 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,443 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,432 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,417 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,403 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,379 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,359 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,346 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,330 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,317 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,300 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,285 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,275 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,252 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,241 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,226 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,204 subscribers12 August 20265 September 2026
23 measurements spanning 24 days, net -339. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,153–17,594 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 03:3917,204-22
3 Sept 2026, 09:4617,226-15
2 Sept 2026, 05:4317,241-11
1 Sept 2026, 02:4517,252-23
31 Aug 2026, 03:5417,275-10
30 Aug 2026, 05:0317,285-15
29 Aug 2026, 02:1617,300-17
28 Aug 2026, 05:2817,317-13
27 Aug 2026, 03:1217,330-16
26 Aug 2026, 00:1617,346-13
25 Aug 2026, 03:4717,359-20
24 Aug 2026, 01:2517,379-24
22 Aug 2026, 05:4317,403-14
20 Aug 2026, 22:5617,417-15
20 Aug 2026, 02:1217,432-11
19 Aug 2026, 03:4717,443-9
18 Aug 2026, 00:3517,452-11
16 Aug 2026, 21:4517,463-21
15 Aug 2026, 14:4717,484-15
14 Aug 2026, 00:2717,499first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 14 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

100,179 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥60,00959.9%
💅20,23120.2%
😭10,41410.4%
💯8,3658.35%
🤬1,1601.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100,179 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 November 2025 to 22 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jan 2026, 13:25 UTC≈50,900 views6,326 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

безмозглая!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

🔥3,490😭1,890💅573💯260🤬113

12 Jan 2026, 13:14 UTC≈64,400 views5,356 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

они играют в рост

🔥3,500💅1,080💯552😭178🤬46

11 Jan 2026, 20:26 UTC≈55,800 views4,924 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥3,170💅807💯465😭437🤬45

8 Jan 2026, 13:17 UTC≈60,900 views4,162 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

💅2,540🔥959💯407😭218🤬38

8 Jan 2026, 12:23 UTC≈52,100 views4,912 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

бпу и бонг встретили новый ягодный фрукт

🔥3,280💯852💅536😭175🤬69

31 Dec 2025, 22:24 UTC≈57,000 views6,104 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

хехе с нг хехе

🔥4,120💅1,060💯544😭320🤬60

28 Dec 2025, 18:13 UTC≈57,700 views5,692 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

он снова, он снова,,,, ОН ОПЯТЬ ПРЫГНУЛ ВЫШЕ ГОЛОВЫ!!!!!!! анимация с оригинальным сюжетом, полноценными задниками, озвучкой......... ОН ДАЖЕ АЛИСУ СМОГ ПОЗВАТЬ!!!!!!!!!!!!1!! о сушебоже, мне должно быть приятно, но это ощущается таким странным, сюрреалистичным. кто бы стал стараться ради того, чтобы порадовать меня? я бы не стал я бы не стал, а они взяли и постарались. вопреки всему. мое полутеплое сердце, сотканное

🔥3,940💅936😭501💯269🤬46

27 Dec 2025, 06:49 UTC≈54,300 views4,473 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

если бы я делал bft не в 2019 а сейчас, ноль далъю ноль была бы пельменем

🔥2,980💅860💯425😭169🤬39

14 Dec 2025, 19:07 UTC≈67,900 views7,167 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

инмт лайвэкшан

🔥4,860💅1,390💯635😭217🤬65

9 Dec 2025, 18:07 UTC≈65,800 views4,063 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥2,630💅722😭492💯167🤬52

9 Dec 2025, 17:38 UTC≈63,500 views4,456 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥2,720💅1,070💯434😭189🤬43

6 Dec 2025, 16:02 UTC≈66,600 views5,674 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

будь он реальным человеком, думаю, мы бы поладили

🔥3,890💅991💯535😭192🤬66

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @aaaarrrpaaa2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“!!!.ф.иИи.ЛиАаА.л.!!!???” (@aaaarrrpaaa2), 17,204 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aaaarrrpaaa2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.