Channel
@abaebad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
556subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001748861337 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @abaebad |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/abaebad |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 556 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 558 | -8 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:39 | 566 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 572 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 572 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
115 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 72 | 62.6% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 19.1% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 7.83% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 5.22% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 2.61% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.87% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.87% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.87% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
مدتها بود که این موضوع مرا میآزرد که هرکجا بحثهای جدی و عمیقی برقرار بود، هر جلسه یا هر محفلی که با موضوعات فلسفی برگزار میشد، یک عدم تعادل شدید بین تعداد زنان و مردان وجود داشت. این مساله به یکی از دغدغههای من بدل شده بود که چرا وقتی قرار است در یک موضوع اجتماعی یا حتی موضوعی مربوط به حقوق زنان، جلسهای برگزار شود، باز هم حضور مردان در این جلسات پررنگتر است. من همواره تلاش میکردم از شرکت کنندگان این سوال ر…
❤7👏2😁2😍1
📸 شرح عکس: "سمپوزیوم اَمرداد" لیگ فلاسفه (بهعنوان نخستین انجمن فراساختاری فلسفه کاربردی در ایران) با موضوع "کار دل | آیین تأثیرگذاری" به راهبری استاد دی داد. @AbaEbad
❤3
کامنت یکی دیگر از مخاطبان ذیل این پست در لینکدین و توضیحات جالبشان دربارهی اهمیت اعداد موهومی در حوزهی تخصصی ایشان
❤5👍5
کامنت یکی از دوستان ذیل این پست در لینکدین 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
❤4👍4
یکی از جذابترین اشیا در ریاضیات عدد موهومی i است. اگر شما در یکی از رشتههای فنی یا مهندسی تحصیل کرده باشید، حتما با اعداد موهومی آشنا شدهاید. اما شاید آنطور که باید و شاید اهمیت و ارزش اعداد موهومی برای شما بازگو نشده است. عددی که هیچ نسبتی با جهان واقعی فیزیکی ندارد. شما وقتی جذر یک عدد منفی مثل 1- (منفی یک) را میگیرید به عدد موهومی میرسید. یعنی اگر عدد i رو در خودش ضرب کنید، این ضرب به شما میدهد 1-. اما ای…
❤11🤔3
توضیح فیزیک با نافیزیک @AbaEbad
مصطفی فرزانه نویسنده و فیلمساز ایرانی و از دوستان صادق خان هدایت جایی این جملات را از او نقل میکند که “سیاست چیز گهی است. کار من نیست. تو یک مملکت حسابی سیاست را میدهند دست متخصص، نه دست من و امثال من. ولی ضمنا همهمان بچه سیاستیم. با سیاست کاری نداریم، سیاست با ما کار دارد.” این حرف بسیار درستیست که شاید نیاز باشد امروز دوباره به آن بیندیشیم. اینکه به جز کسی که کارش سیاست است و متخصص سیاست است، سیاست برای دیگ…
❤9👍2
سیاست نه برای سیاست @AbaEbad
فرض کنیم یک روزی شما در خیابان راه میروید و به یک سری مسائل ریاضی فکر میکنید که پاسخشان را نمیدانید. شاید مثلا به یک سری اعداد فکر میکنید. مثلا فکر میکنید که آیا یک عدد تصادفی که به ذهنتان میرسد، حاصلضرب چه عددی در چه عددی (غیر از یک در خود عدد) میتواند باشد؟ مثلا عدد ۱۰۰ حاصلضرب ۱۰ در ۱۰ است. عدد ۱۴۴ حاصلضرب ۱۲ در ۱۲ است. اما عدد ۳۶۲۱۷۳ چطور؟ این عدد حاضلضرب چه عددی در چه عددیست؟ بدیهیترین راه این است که …
❤3👍3🤔1
جستجو نکن، امتحان کن @AbaEbad
این تصویر را در یکی از روزهای چندماه قبل گرفتم. یکی از روزهای پرفشاری که ما ایرانیان از سرمان گذراندیم. وقتی که در ابتدای صبح به سمت محل کارم میرفتم، این زن را دیدم که در همان اول صبح سگش را برای پیاده روی و گشت و گذار به خیابان آورده است. حقیقتا به حال او غبطه خوردم، نه از این بابت که زندگی ویژهای دارد یا مثلا داشتن حیوان خانگی چیز ویژهایست. غبطه از این بابت که زندگی آرامی دارد. زندگیاش کاملا قابل پیشبینی و …
❤12🤔2👍1
حسرت یک زندگی معمولی @AbaEbad
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @abaebad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اینکه میتوانیم از زمین خارج شویم…
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aba Ebad | اَبا اِباد” (@abaebad), 556 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abaebad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.