Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 23 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 191–214 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Aug 2026, 10:08
211
+2
25 Aug 2026, 07:13
209
+4
17 Aug 2026, 09:26
205
+8
8 Aug 2026, 19:23
197
+3
8 Aug 2026, 11:48
194
no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:33
194
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 16 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
145 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
49
33.8%
👍
35
24.1%
❤
22
15.2%
⚡
12
8.28%
❤🔥
10
6.90%
👏
6
4.14%
😁
3
2.07%
🎉
2
1.38%
🤔
2
1.38%
🕊
1
0.69%
🙏
1
0.69%
🤝
1
0.69%
🤩
1
0.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @abduazim_blogi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 February 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ot sporti eng qimmat sportlar ro'yxatida 2-o'rinda turadi
Tabiiyki yaxshi ot, musobaqa, forma va h.k.larni hammasiga katta pul kerak. Menda esa bunday resurs bo'lmagan
2020-21 yilda sport bilan shug'illanib yurgan vaqtim to'siq sakramaydigan va boshqarish qiyin bo'lgan otni berishgan
Ya'ni hech kimga kerak bo'lmagan va hech narsaga yaramaydigan ot, boshqa tanlov bo'lmagani sabab rozi bo'lganman
O'sha otni tayyorl…
2026 yil oxirigacha qilishim kerak bo'lgan vazifalar
1 oy avval Produsserlik sohasi zerikarli bo'lib qoldi yoki shunday ko'rindi, bunga asosiy sabab bir xil ishni qayta-qayta qilaverganim bo'ldi
Yangi maqsad, yangi loyiha boshlash bo'yicha o'zim hurmat qilgan mutaxassislar bilan maslahatlashdim
Ularni ichida ancha muddatdan beri kuzatib yurgan lekin hali 1x1 suhbatlashib ko'rmagan insonim bilan maslahatlashdim
Ke…
Mas'uliyat odamni ikki turga bo'ladi
Birinchisiga qancha kam mas'uliyat berilsa ham ko'plik qiladi
Ikkinchisiga qancha ko'p mas'uliyat berilsa ham sinib qolmaydi, oxirgacha bajaradi
@abduazim_blogi
Haqiqiy mutaxassisni ishi detallarda ko'rinadi
Har qanday sohani 70%ni 20 soatda o'rgansa bo'ladi degan teoriya mavjud va bunga qisman qo'shilaman
Media va Marketingdagi yangi va o'rta darajadagi mutaxassislar bilan gaplashsam ularni ko'p qismini fikrlashi bir xil
Sohasidagi TOP mutaxassislar esa jarayondagi ahamiyatsiz ko'ringan detallarni ham ko'zdan qochirishmaydi
Yaqinda O'zbekistondagi TOP videograflardan bi…
2026-yilning birinchi yarmi qanday o'tti!
Qilgan ishlarimni sanab berishdan avval uni ikki qismga bo'laman, shaxsiy va sohaviy
Bu yil texnik rivojlanishdan ko'ra fikr taraflama rivojlanishga ko'proq e'tibor qaratdim. Bu uchun ko'proq loyg'iz qolish va tafakkur qilishga harakat qildim
Yil boshidan buyon 8 ta davlatga sayohat qildim, har xil mavzularda yangi kitoblar va maqolalar o'qidim
Yana bir muhim yangilik, pr…
5 yildan so'ng yana professional sportga qaytdim!
2021 yil sportdan ketganim sababi bu yo'nalishni asosiy soha sifatida ko'rolmadim, "hobby" sifatida kelajakda albatta shug'illanaman deb niyyat qilgandim
Oradan ancha vaqt o'tdi va niyyatim amalga oshdi
Keyingi maqsad, sportda faqatgina vaqt o'tkazish emas balki yaqin oylarda musobaqalarda qatnashish va g'olib bo'lish
@abduazim_blogi
Ko'proq mas’uliyat olsang ko’proq pul topasan deyishadi
Bizni jamiyatda kelishilgan vaqtdan kech qolmaslik, bergan va’dasini bajargan insonni "mas’uliyatli" deyiladi
Lekin buni qilish bilan pul ko'payib qolmaydi, bu mas’uliyatni eng oddiy ko’rinishi (must have)
Qanday mas'uliyat ko'proq pul olib keladi?
Bu haqida kam gapiriladi!
Ko’proq pul topish uchun o’z nomimiz bilan risk qilish mas'uliyatini olishni o'rganis…
Tadbiror va frilanserlar orasida eng ko'p uchraydigan xatolardan biri — “hammasini o‘zim qilaman” degan fikr
Jamoamizda juda intizomli, vazifa bersangiz ko'ngildagidek bajaradigan, olgan mas'uliyatini oxirgacha yetkazadigan bir bola bor
Uni ishida bir xato bor: U doim o‘z imkoniyatidan ko‘proq mas’uliyat oladi.
“Buni ham o'zim qilaman, bunga ham ulguraman” deb bir vaqtning o‘zida ko‘p ishni bo‘yniga oladi.
Natija…
Katta chekli mahsulot yoki hizmatni sotishdagi eng kuchli texnika
Mebel yo'nalishida 20 yillik tajribaga ega, yoshi 40 atrofidagi mijoz bilan suhbat o'tkazdim
Mijoz: Avval kurs o'qimaganman, silar o'zi nima o‘rgatasizlar?
Hozir o'zini biznesi yo'q, lekin pul topishni o'rgatadigan biznes trenerlar ko'payib ketti
Sotuvdagi xatolardan biri o'zini oqlashga harakat qilish. Kim o'zini o'qlasa o'sha aybdor bo'ladi
Javo…
🇮🇹 Italiya, Rim va Milan farqi
Milan ba’zi tarixiy binolari va o’ziga xos madaniyati bilan ko’zga ko’ringan shaharlardan hisobladi. Shaharda boshqalardan ajralib turadigan qismini ko'rmadim, tarixiy binolar va kiyim kechak do'konlari turistlar bilan to'la
Rim esa boshqa mavzu, Milandan Rimga mashinada 6 soat yurib bordik, kech bo’lishi, atrofi muhit qorong'i bo'lishiga qaramasdan shahar yoqgandek bo’ldi
Ertasi kun…
⚡3👍3🔥3❤1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @abduazim_blogi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Abduazim Ramziddinov | Blog” (@abduazim_blogi), 211 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abduazim_blogi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.