Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for a boa o'woah

Channel

a boa o'woah

@aboaowoah

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,304subscribers

+154 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003157717950
TypeChannel
Username@aboaowoah
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/aboaowoah

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,1327,3137,222.56 August 2026 — 7,150 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,150 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,151 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,165 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,132 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,260 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,238 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,239 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,228 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,196 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,180 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,218 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,276 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,313 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,304 subscribers7,3046 August 202616 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net +154. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,105–7,340 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 23:567,304-9
12 Sept 2026, 21:187,313+37
9 Sept 2026, 08:587,276+58
4 Sept 2026, 06:387,218+38
1 Sept 2026, 04:357,180-16
29 Aug 2026, 00:287,196-32
25 Aug 2026, 18:037,228-11
22 Aug 2026, 22:347,239+1
19 Aug 2026, 22:447,238-22
16 Aug 2026, 19:557,260+128
13 Aug 2026, 00:277,132-33
9 Aug 2026, 15:117,165+14
6 Aug 2026, 05:037,151+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:167,150no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:317,150first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5,599 reactions across 25 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,36842.3%
😁1,95334.9%
👍4878.70%
🔥4748.47%
👏1192.13%
🥰681.21%
👀400.714%
🤔280.5%
👌180.321%
👎130.232%
🗿130.232%
😱80.143%
🤩40.071%
🍌20.036%
🍓20.036%
😐20.036%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,599 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 25 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aboaowoah. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC≈1,750 views218 reactionsread 20 August 2026

когда вам последний раз было так по-житейски стыдно? 😨 расскажу свой пример из недавнего. утром я пошел выносить мусор. первые 15 минут дня я часто смурной, а тут сразу навалилось: ни один из лифтов все никак не приезжал, у подъезда какой-то уебок опять набросал бычков, на улице в 8 утра уже пекло, солнце яростно слепит глаза, а с мусорного пакета что-то угрожающее капнуло мне на кроксы. до баков идти секунд 20. о

129🔥41😁32👍6👏5🥰4👎1

18 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC≈2,230 views105 reactionsread 20 August 2026

сызмальства восхищался людьми, способными излагать изящно, самобытно, слегка загадочно, но при этом недвусмысленно. 🥂 например у Набокова можно прочитать такой пассаж: «я всегда сомневался в способности моего друга оставаться по сю сторону фантазии». это как мой кореш Виталик, который в заметках телефона приносит показать очередной бизнес-план шиномонтажки, которая его «стопудова» через месяц-другой озолотит. ил

54🔥23👏12👍9👎4👀3

16 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC≈2,940 views238 reactionsread 20 August 2026

чево про Dualingo думаете? че-т захотелось говен на вентилятор накинуть активным юзером я так и не стал, ибо уже после первых робких попыток взаимодействия меня накрыло и больше не отпускало ощущение елейного наебалова. 🤔 под вуалью ✨ образования ✨ мне подсовывают тыкательно-нажимательный конвейер с фокусом на стрики (кол-во дней подряд, в которые я 5 минут тыкал че дают без необходимости как следует включить голо

116😁68👍37🔥8👏4👎3🍓2

13 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC≈4,180 views215 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Penelope's web / Penelope's shroud, крутая неочевидная идиома (как будто про нашу жизнь в последние несколько лет) это мы слегка продолжаем одиссеешную тему, хотя до фильма я так и не доехал еще ахаха. сначала толкование: так говорят о работе, деле, мероприятии или любой затее, которая продолжается как будто только ради того, чтобы никогда не заканчиваться. 🗿 вот лютый бытовой пример ткани Пенелопы: 2018-ый год

164👏26👍14🔥11

12 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC≈4,490 views116 reactionsread 20 August 2026

помните широко разошедшуюся подводку «Намедней» авторства Леонида Генадича Парфенова: то, без чего нас невозможно представить и еще труднее — понять. это из времен энтэвэшного прайма, где он на фоне зеленых ящиков в оверсайз пинжаке и нано-галстуке, молодой-да-ранний. на ютубчике архивы есть в 240p, но душевно. 🥂 я признаюсь: на 69% мотивация вести этот канал состоит из того, чтобы помочь и себе и вам больше поня

74😁19👍15🔥6👏2

11 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC≈4,630 views197 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

читал кто-нибудь? 🌚

😁149👀249😱7👍4🔥2🥰2

10 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC≈4,440 views301 reactionsread 20 August 2026

в чем разница между fate / destiny, если шото шоэто © «судьба» переводится ну в общем да, но нет. в английском это разделяют и там fate — это про судьбу в смысле «вот что неизбежно уготовано» какгрится «на роду написано». а destiny про неизбежное стремление реализовывать свое истинное предназначение, раз уж временно в этом мире очутился. у fate чувствуется нечто лишенное выбора, как пророчество, поэтому эту грань

186😁77🔥25👏13

8 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC≈5,010 views42 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Poll

арбуз или дыня?

  1. арбуз 🙂64%
  2. дыня 🍈36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁2611👍5

6 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC≈5,370 views67 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

38🔥15👍13👌1

6 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC≈5,280 views113 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Posted without readable text

83🔥22👍7🗿1

5 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC≈5,000 views338 reactionsread 20 August 2026

big dick energy (BDE) / small dick energy (SDE) несу в котомке плошечку интернетошного сленга для описания окружающей реальности. девочки, читаем и конспектируем. мальчики, вы тоже сейчас дела тормозните на минуточку, вниманье ваше необходимо. собсна об речь-то? точнее «о ком». BDE (big dick energy) — спокойная железобетонная ежесекундная уверенность. как человек говорит, как молчит. как держит себя и куда смотрит

172👍76😁42🔥31👏10🗿5👀2

3 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC≈5,900 views372 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Одиссею нолановскую-то посмотрели уже? я еще нет, но непременно доеду до кинотеатра, когда хайп поостынет и схлынут попкорновые толпы 🕶️ а пока хочется рассказать про Lotus eaters, то бишь «лотосоедов». если помните гомеровский сюжет, то там есть эпизод, где Одиссей с командой оказываются на острове народа лотофагов (буквально — «поедающие лотос»). эти хлебосольные ребята потчуют гостей лотосными настоечками и оладу

226😁64👍48🔥28👏5😐1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @aboaowoah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@aboaowoah edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTCAnonymous Poll1,420 voters approx.

арбуз или дыня?

  1. арбуз 🙂64%
  2. дыня 🍈36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“a boa o'woah” (@aboaowoah), 7,304 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aboaowoah.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.