Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
23 measurements spanning 91 days, net -74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,223–9,382 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 07:19
9,290
-25
3 Nov 2026, 16:05
9,315
+19
31 Oct 2026, 15:07
9,296
+2
28 Oct 2026, 23:16
9,294
+33
26 Oct 2026, 05:26
9,261
+3
22 Oct 2026, 19:21
9,258
+4
19 Oct 2026, 11:54
9,254
-9
16 Oct 2026, 16:00
9,263
+6
13 Oct 2026, 19:17
9,257
+10
7 Oct 2026, 18:37
9,247
+6
30 Sept 2026, 16:17
9,241
-22
16 Sept 2026, 05:58
9,263
-18
8 Sept 2026, 07:58
9,281
-13
3 Sept 2026, 00:36
9,294
-19
27 Aug 2026, 15:08
9,313
-3
24 Aug 2026, 10:53
9,316
+18
20 Aug 2026, 10:24
9,298
-29
17 Aug 2026, 12:05
9,327
+9
14 Aug 2026, 05:47
9,318
-20
11 Aug 2026, 00:04
9,338
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 24 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.78%
avg views ÷ 9,290 subscribers
Avg views / post
258
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
25 (24 July 2025 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
516
Reactions total
5
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 10:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
24
Videos
5
Links
32
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
33s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
121 reactions across 23 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
77
63.6%
🔥
15
12.4%
❤
8
6.61%
👏
8
6.61%
🤯
6
4.96%
👎
4
3.31%
🤔
2
1.65%
🙏
1
0.826%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2025 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
👀 Landing — лендинги под офферы в 2 клика
ㅤ
Landing — конструктор лендингов, заточенный именно под маркетинг, лиды и продажи.
ㅤ
Тул собирает страницы со структурой, которая будет вести лида к целевому действию.
ㅤ
—> Что умеет:
ㅤ
• Создает лендинги с помощью ИИ.
• Собирает страницы под рекламные кампании.
• Добавляет квизы и лид-магниты.
• Создает интерактивные микроинструменты.
• Подстраивает страницы под фирменный с…
Шторм по всем фронтам: почему Meta, Google и другие источники усиливают контроль
2026 для многих команд выглядит так, будто рекламные платформы одновременно решили проверить рынок на прочность.
В Meta очередной шторм, в Google блокировки фарм-аккаунтов, инстант баны и повторные review уже работающих кампаний, в Bing и Taboola проходят чистки…
Читать материал.
Как зарабатывать $20,000+ в месяц в гугл шоппинг
Большинство арбитражников и дропшипперов привыкли к гонке за «хайповыми» товарами в TikTok и Meta. Нашел виральный продукт ➡️ выжал за 2 месяца ➡️ товар выгорел ➡️ ищешь заново.
Но есть более стабильная и фундаментальная модель: E-commerce + Google Shopping.
Разберем, почему Google Ads — это база для долговечного e-com бизнеса и как это работает на реальных цифрах.
…
Unity Ads: как команда масштабировалась до $73 800 спенда и сохранила ROI 27%
Изменения на In-App рынке заставили команды активнее искать дополнительные источники, чтобы не зависеть от одного DSP и не терять объемы на рабочих GEO. Делать ставку на один источник стало слишком рискованно: часть GEO недоступна, объемы перераспределяются, а альтернатив, способных дать стабильный In-App трафик, не так много.
Читать мате…
PWA-трафик в 2026 году: руководство по запуску + кейс
PWA как формат продолжают регулярно хоронить. Каждые несколько месяцев кто-то заявляет, что они стали слишком рискованными, слишком конкурентными или слишком легко обнаруживаются. Эти разговоры идут ещё с 2022 года.
Читать материал.
⚪️Vidnoz — создание видео с ИИ
Vidnoz — платформа для генерации видео.
—> Что умеет:
• Создаёт видео.
• Генерирует аватары.
• Работает с текстом.
• Упрощает создание.
Можно собирать ролики без съёмок и актёров.
⚪Попробовать: здесь
Делаю больше профита с тех же лидов. Попробуй Лютое комбо из инструментов Leads для воронки
Если ты просто «наливаешь» и не смотришь, что там внутри, ты просто кормишь рекламодателя, а не себя.
Мы поговорили с Максимом Кочу — человеком, который прошел 11 летний путь в арбитраже.
Читать материал.
N1 инсайты: чего ждать от iGaming индустрии в мае
Май усиливает iGaming тренды, наметившиеся во втором квартале: рынок окончательно уходит от модели агрессивного масштабирования в сторону управляемой эффективности. Если ранее рост часто обеспечивался за счёт объёма и поиска «быстрых» связок, сейчас ключевым фактором становится предсказуемость перформанса, работа с LTV и устойчивость воронок на дистанции.
Читать мат…
Антикейс на 300к и смертельные ошибки в Яндекс Директ
Эта статья предназначена для тех, кто уже умеет настраивать кампании, но уперся в «потолок» и ищет профессиональные рычаги для кратного роста ROI и объемов.
Читать материал.
👀 FaceFusion — дипфейки нового уровня
FaceFusion — софтина для замены лиц на фото и видео с качеством кинопродакшена.
—> Что умеет:
• Мгновенная замена лиц с учётом мимики и освещения.
• Синхронизация движения губ с любой аудиодорожкой, восстановление эмоций.
• Встроенные апскейлеры — картинка до 4K без мыла.
• Редактор возраста — омоложение или состаривание персонажей.
Программа работает локально и устанавливает…
👍4❤3👏1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @aboltus_traffic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @aboltus_traffic as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aboltus Traffic | Арбитраж трафика” (@aboltus_traffic), 9,290 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aboltus_traffic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.