Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Нескучно об искусстве

Channel

Нескучно об искусстве

@about_art_channel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,403subscribers

-141 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002200038904
TypeChannel
Username@about_art_channel
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/about_art_channel

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,40310,54410,473.56 August 2026 — 10,544 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,544 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,542 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,539 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,537 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,532 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,529 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,521 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,518 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,515 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,509 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,508 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,504 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,501 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,495 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,488 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,482 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,479 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,476 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,475 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,472 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,471 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,469 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,467 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,462 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,455 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,450 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,441 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,437 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,432 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,428 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,429 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,426 subscribers25 September 2026 — 10,403 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -141. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,382–10,565 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 03:2010,403-23
18 Sept 2026, 21:3810,426-3
16 Sept 2026, 11:5910,429+1
14 Sept 2026, 15:1910,428-4
13 Sept 2026, 02:1910,432-5
11 Sept 2026, 02:1910,437-4
8 Sept 2026, 05:0010,441-9
4 Sept 2026, 22:3810,450-5
3 Sept 2026, 09:1310,455-7
2 Sept 2026, 01:0410,462-5
1 Sept 2026, 02:4410,467-2
31 Aug 2026, 04:0510,469-2
30 Aug 2026, 01:5510,471-1
29 Aug 2026, 04:5410,472-3
28 Aug 2026, 01:4310,475-1
27 Aug 2026, 00:4710,476-3
25 Aug 2026, 23:5210,479-3
24 Aug 2026, 20:2410,482-6
23 Aug 2026, 07:5510,488-7
21 Aug 2026, 15:5710,495first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.03%
avg views ÷ 10,403 subscribers
Avg views / post
524
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held24 (30 July 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total1,047
Reactions total74
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,089 reactions across 23 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤54850.3%
👍20919.2%
🔥10910.0%
custom 5411620357297694805746.80%
🙏464.22%
👏373.40%
🥰161.47%
⚡90.826%
💔90.826%
😍60.551%
🤔60.551%
🤩50.459%
❤‍🔥40.367%
😢40.367%
🙈30.275%
😐20.184%
🌚10.092%
👌10.092%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,132 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC339 views23 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Волшебное «Лебединое озеро» 🦢 Вчера нам посчастливилось увидеть «Лебединое озеро» – и для нас это был совершенно особенный вечер. Несмотря на то, что этот балет можно без преувеличения назвать культовым, мы смотрели его впервые 👀 Скажу даже больше: это всего лишь второй балет в нашей жизни (первым был «Щелкунчик» в Большом театре в декабре). На сцене Москонцерт Холла «Лебединое озеро» представляет Московский госуда…

❤14custom 54116203572976948055🔥2👏1🙏1

27 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC708 views51 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

У окна. Портрет Ирины Кустодиевой (1910). Б.М. Кустодиев (1878–1927). Картон, гуашь. 104 × 69 см. Омский областной музей изобразительных искусств имени М. А. Врубеля. В 1910 г. Кустодиевы жили в Петербурге - художник снимал квартиру на третьем этаже доходного дома в Коломне (историческом районе города). Именно там Борис Михайлович написал этот удивительно теплый портрет своей пятилетней дочери Ирины. Кустодиев рис…

❤39🔥5🥰3custom 54116203572976948053👍1

22 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈1,310 views56 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Погорелые (1871). И.М. Прянишников (1840–1894). Холст, масло. 62 × 88 см. Новосибирский государственный художественный музей. Огромное влияние на Иллариона Прянишникова оказал Василий Перов. Они были не просто коллегами, а близкими друзьями: вместе снимали жилье и в студенческие годы жили настолько бедно, что зимой делили одну шубу на двоих – выходить на улицу приходилось по очереди. Так что героев своих картин Пр…

🙏24❤14💔9😢4😐2custom 54116203572976948052🔥1

19 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,550 views31 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Проблема выбора обоев решена 😎 Вчера вечером я нашла совершенно замечательный проект - «Шедевры Радищевского музея на "рабочем столе"». Суть его в том, что каждый месяц музей выбирает одну работу из своей коллекции и публикует ее в очень хорошем разрешении - адаптированную как для ПК, так и для мобильных устройств. Картиной августа стала работа Павла Кузнецова «Цветы и лимоны» - яркая, солнечная и жизнерадостная. А…

🔥13❤10👍6custom 54116203572976948052

18 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC≈1,530 views59 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

На озере (1893). И.И. Левитан (1860–1900). Холст, масло. 109 × 163 см. Саратовский государственный художественный музей имени А. Н. Радищева. Лето 1893 года Исаак Левитан провел в имении Ушаковых недалеко от Вышнего-Волочка (там же он написал свою знаменитую работу «Над вечным покоем»). Гостил он не один, а с Софьей Кувшинниковой - с ней он ездил по окрестностям в поисках вдохновения и новых мотивов. В этот период …

❤38👏9😍5👍3custom 54116203572976948052🔥1🙏1

17 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC≈1,200 views51 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Младший брат (1905). Анна Анкер (1859–1935). Холст, масло. 69 × 62 см. Собрание Хиршпрунга, Копенгаген. Кажется, дети еще сами не до конца понимают, что произошло: совсем недавно их было трое, а теперь у них появился младший брат! Старшая девочка подошла к кровати вплотную, чтобы как следует рассмотреть малыша, а остальные пока держатся чуть в стороне и осторожничают. Датская художница Анна Анкер особенно любила т…

❤38🔥5👍3🙏3custom 54116203572976948052

17 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC≈1,190 views26 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🌿 IX Фестиваль исторических садов в Царицыне С 21 по 30 августа Воздушные сады музея-заповедника «Царицыно» превратятся в большую творческую лабораторию. Ландшафтные архитекторы, художники и дизайнеры представят 17 садовых проектов на тему «Город-сад». 🌱 Среди них «Сад. Живой спектакль» с аудиосопровождением актеров Театра Ермоловой, японский «Цубонива, сад торговца фарфором», «Стрит-арт сад. Искусство улиц», «Любо…

❤10👍9🔥5custom 54116203572976948052

16 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC≈1,040 views55 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤39👍6🥰6custom 54116203572976948054

14 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC≈1,320 views53 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Наконец-то я добралась до акварели 🤩 Эту работу я написала в рамках курса Ильи Ибряева. По задумке должен был получиться легкий и воздушный весенний пейзаж с огромным небом, дорогой и свежей зеленью. И, кажется, что-то уже начинает получаться 😁 Вообще с акварелью у меня пока отношения непростые. Мало того, что боюсь чистого листа, так еще и тот факт, что акварель не прощает ошибок, уверенности не добавляет. Как пе…

❤23👍17🔥8custom 54116203572976948055

13 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC≈1,390 views52 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Говорят, это самый маленький памятник в Москве 🐌 Вот такая милая улитка скромно притаилась в одном из двориков Замоскворечья. Строго говоря, отдельным памятником она не считается: крошечная улитка всего лишь украшает кованую лестницу. Но разве от этого она становится хоть чуточку менее очаровательной? 🌟 Голиковский переулок, 8 🙎‍♀️ Нескучно об искусстве

👍26❤16🔥5🥰3custom 54116203572976948052

12 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC≈1,320 views39 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤16🔥11👍5custom 54116203572976948054🙈3

11 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC≈1,070 views54 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

В парке (около 1874). Берта Моризо (1841–1895). Пастель, бумага на картоне. 71 × 89 см. Пти-Пале, Париж. Когда-то Берта Моризо и ее сестра Эдма вместе мечтали стать художницами – они обе учились живописи у Камиля Коро и даже выставлялись в Салоне. Но, выйдя замуж, Эдма оставила профессиональную живопись – в отличие от Берты. Та продолжила свой путь и стала одной из главных художниц импрессионизма. Сестра стала для…

❤28👍15🔥8custom 54116203572976948052🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @about_art_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нескучно об искусстве” (@about_art_channel), 10,403 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/about_art_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.