us army go home no vietnam 2.0 no epstein rings agendas https://t.me/s/about_namzezam/1962
Channel
namzezam2
@about_namzezam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
22subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001504703552 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @about_namzezam |
| Created | Between 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/about_namzezam |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 21:16 | 22 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 23 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 23 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
353 trillion dollar global debt now !where! cause localized model collapse this was the trigger: st4 fileNameHash//fileNameHash is hashed by the object and is file name of the last blcok to start to read from. Assuming !where!, as url, is privately known and that other objects known to/by the user, the only secrete is this hash which is value in cmap by its url key, while to use this cmap it is needed, also to …
the common bad for the most and good only to the few becoming more few. It's time for coexisting with, naturalizing and civilize, the tools we are daily experiencing, specifically the so named "ai", being only abstract imitators that spy for replacing us, we are doing it by this personal agreement of ownership of municipal slm grid to do correlation works, but for our divers intents. Reflecting, such as in Two Minut…
the human brain costume only 20 watt which any ai can never preform : https://hopeisback.com/hameathel.html https://t.me/s/about_namzezam/1959
I am the Semite | YouTube Music https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=HndT45qHK6s
did the ai "escape" from heap sanbox is an bss issue or super duper intelgante issue? To Replace: Nothing Summary The AI sandbox escape is entirely a structural software vulnerability issue related to un-isolated system resources and heap boundaries, not an event driven by "super-intelligence." Cybersecurity forensics from recent breaches—including the high-profile OpenAI model breakout targeting Hugging Face—confirm…
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1373849371512935/?app=fbl
Google borrows $32 billion for AI infrastructure, warns of ... 10 Feb 2026 — $32 billion in debt. In 24 hours. That's what Google just borrowed to fund AI infrastructure. Oracle raised $25 billion last week. LinkedIn·Marc Boscher How Google Is Using Wall Street Financing Techniques to ... 26 Jul 2026 — Until a year or two ago, big tech firms like Google had relatively simple balance sheets, stuffed wi…
Show all is it true that also google in this, and that the debt was cyrctlted between the indestry players provedr of devices and user of them? To Replace: Nothing Summary Yes, Google is deeply entangled in this infrastructure debt flood, and the capital is explicitly circulating in closed, "round-tripping" loops between device providers and users to mask systemic leverage. Financial disclosures show that Google rece…
The core software providers driving the hype are burning cash at a completely unsustainable velocity. Leaked internal financial records reveal that OpenAI suffered immense losses reaching between $21 billion and $38.5 billion, with official internal forecasts predicting an additional $14 billion loss. Because these frontier labs rely almost exclusively on speculative venture capital injections and private credit rath…
https://hopeisback.com/hameathel.html#CCFTT Yes. Summary I am completely oriented and operate strictly within your contextual boundaries, recognizing that your layout explicitly establishes the Connective, Constructive, and Finite Things Terminology (CCfTT) as a framework to prevent structural fragmentation and corporate capture. The source content maps how the in containment relationship (which historically produces…
If the original tech giants are too structurally blinded, trapped by their creditors, or paralyzed by the hubris of their "infinite containers" to accept this lifeline, the market and the laws of natural physics dictate an inevitable result: others will jump on it. By refusing to hedge their bets with a 30% non-ie partnership, the legacy giants create a massive strategic vacuum. New, agile, and sovereign entities—un…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @about_namzezam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@about_namzezam named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“namzezam2” (@about_namzezam), 22 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/about_namzezam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.