Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Абзац. Мнения

Channel

Абзац. Мнения

@absatz_opinion

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,002subscribers

-141 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001958892715
TypeChannel
Username@absatz_opinion
Created5 September 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/absatz_opinion

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,00010,14310,071.56 August 2026 — 10,143 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,143 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,142 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,130 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,122 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,118 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,113 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,110 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,108 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,102 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,096 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,093 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,085 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,081 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,077 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,069 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,065 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,062 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,060 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,053 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,060 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,057 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,055 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,050 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,047 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,042 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,039 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,034 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,032 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,014 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,008 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,002 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,000 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,002 subscribers10,0026 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 45 days, net -141. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,979–10,164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 15:3910,002+2
17 Sept 2026, 03:0010,000-2
15 Sept 2026, 07:1510,002-6
13 Sept 2026, 18:1610,008-6
11 Sept 2026, 22:1510,014-18
9 Sept 2026, 11:0110,032-2
6 Sept 2026, 00:0210,034-5
3 Sept 2026, 18:0010,039-3
2 Sept 2026, 08:0410,042-5
1 Sept 2026, 08:1410,047-3
31 Aug 2026, 07:5310,050-5
30 Aug 2026, 05:0310,055-2
29 Aug 2026, 05:1310,057-3
27 Aug 2026, 05:3410,060+7
26 Aug 2026, 07:4310,053-7
25 Aug 2026, 05:4710,060-2
24 Aug 2026, 08:1810,062-3
22 Aug 2026, 15:0810,065-4
21 Aug 2026, 02:2410,069-8
19 Aug 2026, 22:5310,077first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.6%
avg views ÷ 10,002 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,470
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.193%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held55 (24 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total38,120
Reactions total50
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15m 12s
Average length
3m 02s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

590 reactions across 48 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍14825.1%
🤔9115.4%
9015.3%
👎6210.5%
🔥579.66%
😁366.10%
😱203.39%
👏193.22%
🤡193.22%
🤣142.37%
💯132.20%
🤯61.02%
🥴50.847%
👌30.508%
💊30.508%
🤩20.339%
😢10.169%
🤬10.169%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 620 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC225 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

Что думаете, нужны ли родительские чаты?

  1. Нужны, без них неудобно17%
  2. В них надо прописывать четкие правила40%
  3. От них больше вреда, чем пользы43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1👍1🥴1

28 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈4,160 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Родительские чаты назвали «дьявольским изобретением» 1 сентября еще даже не наступило, а родительские чаты уже успели кого-то утомить. Сегодня глава комитета по образованию Госсобрания Башкирии Айбулат Хажин призвал отказаться от подобных чатов. Особенно опасными он назвал группы, в которых не присутствует учитель: «Там, где в чате только одни родители, бог знает что творится. Нет, там не бог знает, там сатана знае

27 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC377 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

Чего не хватает современному российскому кино?

  1. Оригинальных сценариев70%
  2. Разнообразия жанров17%
  3. У нас отличное кино13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍4

27 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC≈6,400 views19 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Советское кино остается частью культурного кода россиян Причем речь не только о старших поколениях. Даже среди молодежи 18–24 лет две трети смогли вспомнить сцены из советских фильмов. Лучше всего россияне помнят ленту «Иван Васильевич меняет профессию» – сцены из нее назвали 25% опрошенных. Следом идут «Брат» – 23%, «Брат-2» – 18%, «Ворошиловский стрелок» – 12% и «Любовь и голуби» – 11%. Так что советское кино по

👍181

26 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC≈10,800 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Пашинян превращает Армению в инструмент против России Армянский премьер-министр заявил, что был бы рад исключению своей страны из ОДКБ. Также он готов подать заявку на вступление в Евросоюз. Чем это может обернуться для Армении, рассуждает обозреватель «Абзаца» Андрей Перла: «Провозглашенная Пашиняном так называемая Четвертая республика, по сути, представляет собой отказ от армянской государственности, отказ от сув

🤡6

26 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC451 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

А вы что думаете?

  1. За хорошие оценки можно платить15%
  2. Карманные деньги нужны, но не за учебу80%
  3. Детям вообще не нужно давать деньги5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3

26 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC427 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Каждый четвертый родитель платит детям за хорошие оценки Карманные деньги стали привычной частью жизни школьников. Большинство россиян считают, что начинать выдавать ребенку средства можно в возрасте 7–10 лет. Чаще всего суммы невнушительные: свыше трети россиян дают ребенку до 500 рублей в неделю. По 7% родителей готовы выделять от 2 до 5 тыс. рублей или даже больше. При этом деньги становятся и способом повлиять

3

25 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC494 viewsread 29 August 2026
Poll

А как считаете вы?

  1. К эзотерике можно и нужно обращаться11%
  2. Звездам нельзя доверять свою жизнь28%
  3. Я в это вообще не верю61%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC≈7,530 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Россияне выбирают эзотерику вместо психологов Свежее исследование показало, что 22% взрослых людей обращались к эзотерическим практикам за последние пять лет. Для сравнения: к психологам, психотерапевтам, психологической литературе и тренингам за это же время обращались 19%. Самым популярным направлением для россиян оказались гороскопы и астрологические прогнозы. Конечно, чаще всего эзотерика остается развлечением,

24 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC546 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

А вы что думаете?

  1. О здоровье должны рассказывать только медики63%
  2. Рассказывать могут все, но врачей нужно отмечать14%
  3. Ходить надо в поликлинику, а не блогеров смотреть23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2🔥1😁1😱1

24 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈6,710 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Россияне бездумно смотрят контент медицинских блогеров Почти треть наших граждан подписаны хотя бы на одного блогера, рассказывающего о медицине. Подавляющее большинство пользователей говорят о том, что авторам важно быть квалифицированными специалистами. Вот только реально смотрят на наличие образования всего 29% россиян. Остальные либо не задумываются об этом, либо только собираются это сделать. Медицинскими блог

🔥2😁21👎1👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @absatz_opinion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 22 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTCAnonymous Poll35 voters

Что думаете, нужны ли родительские чаты?

  1. Нужны, без них неудобно17%
  2. В них надо прописывать четкие правила40%
  3. От них больше вреда, чем пользы43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTCAnonymous Poll70 voters

Чего не хватает современному российскому кино?

  1. Оригинальных сценариев70%
  2. Разнообразия жанров17%
  3. У нас отличное кино13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTCAnonymous Poll74 voters

А вы что думаете?

  1. За хорошие оценки можно платить15%
  2. Карманные деньги нужны, но не за учебу80%
  3. Детям вообще не нужно давать деньги5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTCAnonymous Poll83 voters

А как считаете вы?

  1. К эзотерике можно и нужно обращаться11%
  2. Звездам нельзя доверять свою жизнь28%
  3. Я в это вообще не верю61%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTCAnonymous Poll120 voters

А вы что думаете?

  1. О здоровье должны рассказывать только медики63%
  2. Рассказывать могут все, но врачей нужно отмечать14%
  3. Ходить надо в поликлинику, а не блогеров смотреть23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTCAnonymous Poll110 voters

А вы что думаете?

  1. Родители обязаны обеспечить детей жильем6%
  2. Можно помочь детям с первым взносом74%
  3. Покупка квартиры – задача детей20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Абзац. Видео
@Absatzvideo · 23,020
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Абзац. Мнения” (@absatz_opinion), 10,002 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/absatz_opinion.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.