Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Будда | буддизм

Channel

Будда | буддизм

@abuddha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,262subscribers

-241 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001000007034
TypeChannel
Username@abuddha
Created20 November 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/abuddha

Growth

18,26218,50518,383.55 August 2026 — 18,503 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,503 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,505 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,496 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,491 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,474 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,472 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,451 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,450 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,430 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,419 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,401 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,397 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,375 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,363 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,367 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,362 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,354 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,341 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,344 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,334 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,314 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,310 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,314 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,305 subscribers3 September 2026 — 18,302 subscribers5 September 2026 — 18,292 subscribers8 September 2026 — 18,262 subscribers5 August 20268 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 34 days, net -241. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,226–18,541 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 12:2018,262-30
5 Sept 2026, 03:3918,292-10
3 Sept 2026, 11:3918,302-3
2 Sept 2026, 05:4218,305-9
1 Sept 2026, 02:3518,314+4
31 Aug 2026, 00:2418,310-4
29 Aug 2026, 04:3718,314-20
28 Aug 2026, 02:0618,334-10
26 Aug 2026, 22:5618,344+3
25 Aug 2026, 19:2418,341-13
24 Aug 2026, 21:5918,354-8
23 Aug 2026, 06:5718,362-5
21 Aug 2026, 15:0618,367+4
20 Aug 2026, 13:1118,363-12
19 Aug 2026, 11:5718,375-22
18 Aug 2026, 14:4618,397-4
17 Aug 2026, 12:2918,401-18
16 Aug 2026, 02:5818,419-11
13 Aug 2026, 05:3518,430-20
12 Aug 2026, 03:3418,450first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.0%
avg views ÷ 18,262 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,550
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held40 (6 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total45,960
Reactions total1,512
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 08:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,445 reactions across 39 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,93456.1%
🙏73721.4%
👍36210.5%
🔥2276.59%
😍692.00%
👏421.22%
🥰411.19%
🤩230.668%
👌100.29%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,445 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 39 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @abuddha. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC≈1,720 views82 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026

Поддержка подобна капле воды, падающей на сухую землю. Если ваше сердце жаждет поделиться теплом, напишите нам свое послание. Пусть оно станет семенем доброты, которое прорастет в вашем внутреннем саду. 🙏 Будда | Буддизм

56🙏12🥰9👏3👍1😍1

28 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC≈1,770 views66 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Помощь живым существам – дело чрезвычайно трудное и утомительное, но даже если мы считаем, что пробудились от кошмара сансары, нам всё равно это снится. Однако чаще всего те обстоятельства, в которых мы живём, способствуют тому, чтобы мы поверили, что сон – это реальность, и редко показывают нам, что на самом деле вся наша жизнь полностью иллюзорна. © Дзонгсар Джамьянг Кхьенце Норбу Ринпоче

51🙏12👍3

27 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC≈2,010 views102 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Не важно где мы находимся, у нас всегда есть потенциал пребывать за пределами мира, за пределами нашего дома, нужно лишь просто посмотреть внутрь себя. Вот и всё! © Бхикку Буддадаса

63🙏30😍5👍4

25 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC≈2,730 views83 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

В учении Дхаммы термин «рождение» указывает на всплытие идеи «я» или «эго» в сознании. Это происходит снова и снова, как волна за волной. Тот, кто просветлён, рождается реже; благородный арья рождается ещё реже, пока в конце концов не прекращает рождаться совсем. Каждый раз, когда ум цепляется за «я» в какой-либо форме, происходит «рождение». Потому «рождение» может случаться бесчисленное множество раз в течение дня.

53🙏20👍4🥰3👌1👏1😍1

19 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈3,280 views44 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

✨Дорогие друзья! Знаете ли вы, что тибетские йогини прошлого встречали страх не сопротивлением, а присутствием — тихим, глубоким, безмолвным — и так превращали его в дверь к свободе? Об этом — новый канал: Танец Дакини 🪷 Здесь — не мотивационные цитаты, а подлинные наставления великих женщин-йогинь прошлого: их истории, их путь и практики, которые они реально использовали, чтобы превращать боль и препятствия в чи

26🙏10🔥4👍3👏1

19 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC≈2,590 views27 reactionsread 3 September 2026

История повествует, что Хакуин, был уже известным художником, когда встретил одного старца, монаха, мастера дзен, который рисовал такой совершенный эн... @abuddha

👍1210🙏3🥰2

19 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC≈2,610 views97 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Существует дзэн-буддийская история, в которой ученик спрашивает своего мастера: «Мастер, как вести просветление в действие? Как практиковать его в повседневной жизни?» «Тем, что ты ешь и спишь», — ответил мастер. «Но, Мастер, каждый человек ест и каждый — спит». «Но не каждый ест, когда он ест, и не каждый спит, когда он спит». От этой истории происходит и знаменитая дзэнская пословица: «Когда я ем, я ем; когда я сп

53🙏23🔥11👍7🥰3

18 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC≈2,340 views122 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Практикующим дзэн присуще чувство юмора, поскольку сами занятия раскрепощают их, и это чувство развивается у них естественным образом. В стенах дзэнских монастырей слышно больше раскатов живого смеха, чем в любых религиозных заведениях. Хохот свидетельствует о душевном здоровье, юмор служит для того, чтобы разбивать ложные представления, снимать напряжение и учить тому, чему не научить словами. ~ Конрад Хайерс. «Дзэ

74🔥24🤩12👍7🙏5

18 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC≈2,290 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026

В дзэнской практике используется термин «дзэнтай саю», то есть «весь организм в действии»; ничто не остается в резерве, ничто не скрыто, не замаскиров... @abuddha

12🙏8🔥3👍2

18 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC≈2,430 views76 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Короткие летние дни, Как долго дремать вам осталось В струях водопада?... ~ Басе @abuddha

49🙏16👍8😍3

18 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC≈2,320 views76 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

На лугу, Раздвигая густые травы, Блуждает олень, И беззвучно, безмолвно Сыплются капли росы. ~ Сайгё @abuddha

51🙏14👍11

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @abuddha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Будда
@prosvetlennyj · 45,018
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 August 2026
🕉 СТУПЕНИ СОЗНАНИЯ
@StupenySoznaniya · 38,737
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 31 August 2026
Садхгуру
@SadhguruRussia · 30,626
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Будда | буддизм” (@abuddha), 18,262 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abuddha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.