Channel
@abueevaaa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,809subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 16 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001715128400 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @abueevaaa |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/abueevaaa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 2,809 | +1 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:26 | 2,808 | no change |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:22 | 2,808 | no change |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:47 | 2,808 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 27 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (27 August 2026 – 11 September 2026) |
| Views total | 16,684 |
| Reactions total | 286 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
286 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 251 | 87.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 3.85% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 3.15% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 2.45% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 1.40% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 1.40% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 286 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Можно ли работать с питанием и помогать людям без медицинского образования? этот вопрос мне задают почти каждый день. И я отвечаю честно: да, можно. Но только если у тебя есть фундаментальные знания в физиологии, биохимии и анатомии, а также навык работать с научными данными Я сама долго искала структурированный подход, который не скатывается в «пейте соду». И нашла бесплатный марафон «РЕСТАРТ: Нутрициология с нуля…
не смогла заснять 2 операции по ФЭК + малоинвазивная витрэктомии была я как раз в той самой легендарной операционной в виде ромашки 🥹
❤19👏4😍2
я все еще не понимаю , что за прикол с этим ботом и почему мне не дают копировать сообщения 😔😭 потом поменяю ссылку для вопросов , а пока так Здравствуйте! Мне кажется , это редкая практика , потому что 1 курс не воспринимают как людей хотя бы с минимальной клин базой 🥲 Если только в качестве волонтера , но я не помню , были ли у них какие-то требования по курсам и допуску к дежурствам И отвечу на второе сообщени…
❤22
Photo, posted without a caption
❤23❤🔥4
Вообще в интернете очень мало адекватной, структурированной информации по гематологии: анемии еще ладно, но вот гемостаз, иммунология, лейкозы - это полный провал. Либо непонятные клинреки на 100 страниц, либо статьи уровня «что такое гемоглобин»🥲 Я недавно наткнулась на канал врача-гематолога Алёны Андреевны. Там много полезного для студентов и ординаторов - всё по делу и без воды. Простым языком объясняются сложные…
❤5
мотивация в мнтк be like : 😎😎
❤31❤🔥7🕊1
здравствуйте! мне легко заводить знакомства с людьми, но в новых компаниях я могу чувствовать себя некомфортно первое время у нас по чистой случайности сформировалась кавказская интернациональная группа , поэтому привыкнуть было намного легче ну и в целом , в ординатуре никто не занимается детстким садом , все взрослые люди , будущие коллеги , так что проблем с коммуникацией не бывает даже у интеровертов - социофоб…
❤20🕊2
для кого как , но если есть возможность поступить в другом городе , например в Москве или в Питере , то лучше поступать там практика в 80% хороших местах зависит от вас , скажу так в любой больнице найдутся добрые врачи, которые ценят инициативных студентов
❤8
ощущение будто мозг стерилен на все 100%😂 Свобода не ощущается , потому что я продолжаю учебу 2 года , но уже в ординатуре Есть один плюс - больше практики и одно направление Вам не нужно распыляться на все сферы медицины Хотя и в офтальмо оочень много узких направлений
❤17
интересные книжки с конференции вам нашла в электронном формате !
❤5
справочник врача - офтальмолога , тоже в электронном формате #офтальмология
❤5
цветной атлас по офтальмологии в эл формате #офтальмология
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @abueevaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@abueevaaa named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“abueevaa” (@abueevaaa), 2,809 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abueevaaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.