Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Abu Leil

Channel

Abu Leil

@abuleilll

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

6,891subscribers

+363 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002266597389
TypeChannel
Username@abuleilll
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/abuleilll

Growth

6,5286,8916,709.56 August 2026 — 6,528 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,528 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,540 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,558 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,598 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,642 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,713 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,747 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,776 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,817 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,868 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,891 subscribers6 August 20263 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 28 days, net +363. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,474–6,945 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 14:166,891+23
31 Aug 2026, 11:456,868+51
28 Aug 2026, 20:536,817+41
25 Aug 2026, 19:476,776+29
22 Aug 2026, 16:036,747+34
19 Aug 2026, 09:166,713+71
16 Aug 2026, 03:376,642+44
12 Aug 2026, 18:576,598+40
9 Aug 2026, 11:326,558+18
6 Aug 2026, 21:226,540+12
6 Aug 2026, 10:216,528no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:066,528first reading

Engagement

63 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.2%
avg views ÷ 6,891 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,530
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 63 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 35 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held63 (1 August 202619 August 2026)
Views total53,647
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
929
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 63 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
320
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @abuleilll. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 63 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 20 August 2026

Семейная жизнь у первых поколений строилась не на постоянном выяснении: «Кто что и кому сколько должен?», а на правильном понимании обязанностей, взаимной помощи и учёте обстоятельств. ‘Али, да будет доволен им Аллах, не оставил вопрос бытовой нагрузки неопределённым: он распределил дела таким образом, чтобы каждый член семьи выполнял свою часть работы, а домашнее хозяйство не превращалось в непосильное бремя для од

19 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC990 viewsread 20 August 2026

МУДРОЕ РАСПРЕДЕЛЕНИЕ ОБЯЗАННОСТЕЙ В СЕМЬЕ 💬Сказал благородный сподвижник ‘Али ибн Аби Толиб (ум. 40 г.х.), да будет доволен им Аллах, своей матери: اكفي فاطمة الخدمة خارجاً، وتكفيك هي العمل في البيت والعجن والخبز والطحن. «Освободи Фатыму от работы за пределами дома, а она избавит тебя от работы внутри дома: от замешивания теста, выпечки хлеба и помола муки». 🆗 [منجد الخطيب ، ٢٧٠] 💭 https://t.me/abuleilll

18 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC≈2,410 views0 reactions2 Starsread 20 August 2026

Сегодня семья может оказаться на грани развода из-за слова, сообщения, обиды, бытовой мелочи или недостаточно быстро поставленного «лайка». Социальные сети же только усилили эту проблему. Человек постоянно видит чужую «идеальную» семейную жизнь: красивые фотографии, подарки, путешествия, романтические признания. И начинает сравнивать с ней собственный дом, где есть усталость, обязанности, разногласия и обычная челове

18 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC≈2,270 viewsread 20 August 2026

20 ЛЕТ БРАКА БЕЗ ЕДИНОЙ ССОРЫ *⃣Имам Ахмад ибн Ханбаль (ум. 241 г.х.), да помилует его Аллах, когда вспоминал свою первую жену Умм Солих, то испрашивал для неё милости у Аллаха и говорил: مكثنا عشرين سنة، ما اختلفنا في كلمة. «Мы прожили вместе двадцать лет, и ни разу не разошлись во мнениях даже в одном слове». 🆗 [منجد الخطيب ، ٢٦٩] 💭 https://t.me/abuleilll

17 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC≈1,380 viewsread 20 August 2026

В этих словах не просто красивый стих, а мера мужества, справедливости и ответственности. Къоды Шурайх видел, как мужчины поднимали руки на своих жён, однако сам не позволял гневу становиться оправданием несправедливости. Здесь также раскрывается настоящий смысл мужской силы: она не в способности подавить слабого, а в способности владеть собой, когда есть возможность причинить вред. Его же ласковые слова о своей су

17 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 20 August 2026

О ЗАВЕЩАНИИ ДОБРОГО ОТНОШЕНИЯ К ЖЁНАМ *⃣Продекламировал известный таби’ин, судья и факъых — Абу Умайя Шурайх ибн аль-Харис аль-Кинди (ум. 78 г.х.), да помилует его Аллах: «Я видел мужей, что жён своих бьют, Да отсохнет десница моя, коль Зейнаб ударю я! Ужель без вины накажу её я? Где ж правда моя, коль безвинную бью я? Зейнаб — это солнце, а прочие женщины лишь звёзды, И когда восходит солнце, ни одна звезда уже не

16 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC≈1,600 views0 reactions5 Starsread 20 August 2026

Приверженцы Сунны — вот элита и настоящие воины этой Уммы, а не эти выступающие в октагоне мальчики в шортиках на побегушках у владельцев яхудов.

16 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC≈1,610 views0 reactions2 Starsread 20 August 2026

Будем временами кошмарить ммашников. А то их знакомые "студенты" свои головы им в жопы засунули, продались за мирские крохи и дали согласие на их выступления.

Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @abuleilll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@abuleilll edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Abu Leil” (@abuleilll), 6,891 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abuleilll.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.