Posted without readable text
π33π6β€5π³3π₯°3π3π―2
Signed UMARKHAN

Channel
@abusaxiyrus
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Posts edited after publishing Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
176,321subscribers
+4,601 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 100,000β316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001365822011 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @abusaxiyrus |
| Description | ποΈΠΠΎΡΠΊΠ²Π° π ΠΠ΅ΡΡΠΎ Π©ΡΠ»ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π©ΡΠ»ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ 54 π +79801707777 πΠΠ΅ΡΡΠΎ ΠΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎ Π°Π»ΡΡΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ 84 π +79773470000 π ΠΠ΅ΡΡΠΎ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠ·Π°Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²Π° Π΄ΠΎΠΌ 6 ΠΠ±ΡΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡ π +79856220000 ποΈΠ‘Π°Π½ΠΊΡ-ΠΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ±ΡΡΠ³ π ΠΠ΅ΡΡ Π‘ΠΏΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ²Π° Π΄ΠΎΠΌ 3 π +79818770000 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/abusaxiyrus |
Ecommerce storefront β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 04:21 | 176,321 | +2,601 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 173,720 | +1,030 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 172,690 | +178 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 172,512 | +332 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 172,180 | +450 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 171,730 | +132 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 171,598 | +110 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 171,488 | -113 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 171,601 | +50 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:44 | 171,551 | +53 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:48 | 171,498 | +49 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 171,449 | +181 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 171,268 | -126 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 171,394 | -194 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 171,588 | -81 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:44 | 171,669 | +16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 171,653 | +36 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 171,617 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 171,618 | -143 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 171,761 | first reading |
61 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 131 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 61 (24 June 2026 β 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,391,600 |
| Reactions total | 3,593 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 17:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 6 October 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
12,253 reactions across 54 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 7,620 | 62.2% | |
| π | 1,954 | 15.9% | |
| π₯ | 550 | 4.49% | |
| π | 388 | 3.17% | |
| π | 190 | 1.55% | |
| π― | 164 | 1.34% | |
| π | 156 | 1.27% | |
| π | 139 | 1.13% | |
| π€·ββ | 131 | 1.07% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 124 | 1.01% | |
| π | 120 | 0.979% | |
| π | 94 | 0.767% | |
| π₯° | 94 | 0.767% | |
| π³ | 87 | 0.71% | |
| π | 75 | 0.612% | |
| π | 72 | 0.588% | |
| π | 71 | 0.579% | |
| π | 57 | 0.465% | |
| π«‘ | 52 | 0.424% | |
| π | 32 | 0.261% | |
| 4 further kinds | 83 | 0.677% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 12,253 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
π33π6β€5π³3π₯°3π3π―2
Signed UMARKHAN
0510.2026 18 Pro 256GB Glacier Esim 109.900π΅ 18 Pro 256GB Black Esim 114.900β«οΈ 18 Pro 256GB Burgundy Esim 114.900π€ 18 Pro 256GB Silver Esim 109.900βͺοΈ 18 Pro Max: 18 Pro Max 256GB Black Esim 129.900β«οΈ 18 Pro Max 256GB Black Sim+Esim 144.900β«οΈ 18 Pro Max 256GB Burgundy Esim 134.900π€ 18 Pro Max 256GB Burgundy Sim+Esim 146.900π€ 18 Pro Max 256GB Glacier Esim 129.900π΅ 18 Pro Max 256GB Glacier Sim+Esim 134.900π΅ β¦
β€80π10π₯4β€βπ₯3π3π3π2π1
Signed UMARKHAN
π± iPhone π± iPhone 13 128Gb 46.900β½ iPhone 14 128Gb 49.900β½ iPhone 15 128Gb 54.900β½ iPhone 15 Plus 128Gb β½ iPhone 16 128Gb 66.900β½ iPhone 16 plus 128Gb 74.900β½ iPhone 16 pro max 256Gb 98.900β½ iPhone 17 Air 256Gb 74.900β½ iPhone 17 256Gb 76.900β½ eSIM iPhone 17 256Gb 77.900β½ Sim+eSIM iPhone 17 Pro 256Gb 94.900β½eSIMπ iPhone 17 Pro 256Gb 98.900β½eSIMβͺοΈ iPhone 17 Pro 256Gb 98.900β½Sim+eSIMπ iPhone 17 Pro 256Gb 1β¦
β€84π12π10π₯7β€βπ₯4π3π2π2
Signed UMARKHAN
https://t.me/abusaxiyrus
π₯51β€35π15π14π3β€βπ₯2π₯°2π1
Signed UMARKHAN
ABUSAXIY π’ pinned Β«ABU-SAXIY π± SAMSUNG π± SAMSUNG A18 4/128Gb 17.900β½ SAMSUNG A16 4/128Gb 13.900β½ SAMSUNG A17 4/128Gb 14.900β½ SAMSUNG A17 6/128Gb 16.900β½ SAMSUNG A17 8/256Gb 19.900β½ SAMSUNG A26 6/128Gb 19.900β½ SAMSUNG A36 8/256Gb 25.900β½ SAMSUNG A56 8/128Gb 26.900β½β¦Β»
03.10.2026 18 Pro 256GB Glacier Esim 109.900π΅ 18 Pro 256GB Black Esim 114.900β«οΈ 18 Pro 256GB Burgundy Esim 124.900π€ 18 Pro 256GB Silver Esim 124.900βͺοΈ 18 Pro Max: 18 Pro Max 256GB Black Esim 129.900β«οΈ 18 Pro Max 256GB Black Sim+Esim 144.900β«οΈ 18 Pro Max 256GB Burgundy Esim 139.900π€ 18 Pro Max 256GB Burgundy Sim+Esim 146.900π€ 18 Pro Max 256GB Glacier Esim 129.900π΅ 18 Pro Max 256GB Glacier Sim+Esim 134.900π΅β¦
β€133π38π€·ββ11π―8π6π4π₯°4π3
Signed UMARKHAN
π± HONOR π± Honor 200 8/256Gb 21.900β½ Honor X9d 8/256Gb 27.900β½ Honor X9d 12/256Gb 31.900β½ Honor X8d 8/128Gb 15.900β½ Honor X8d 8/256Gb 19.900β½ Honor X7e 6/256Gb 16.900β½ Honor Turbo 5G 8/256Gb 27.900β½ Honor 600 LITE 8/256Gb 26.900β½ Honor 600 5G 8/256Gb 35.900β½ Honor 600 5G 12/256Gb 39.900β½ Honor 600 5G 8/512Gb 41.900β½ Honor 600 5G 12/512Gb 44.900β½ Honor 600 Pro 5G 12/256Gb 61.900β½ Honor 600 Pro 5G 12/512Gb 64.900β½
β€102π53π₯8π8π8π€·ββ5π³4π―3
Signed Abusaxiy_new
https://t.me/abusaxiyrus
β€74π44π―12π€·ββ6β€βπ₯5π3π3π3
Signed Abusaxiy_new
https://t.me/abusaxiyrus
β€71π₯42π26π11π₯°8π3π3π€·ββ3
Signed UMARKHAN
18 Pro: 18 Pro 256GB Black Esim 125000 18 Pro 256GB Burgundye Esim 125000 18 Pro Max: 18 Pro Max 256GB Black Esim 149000 18 Pro Max 256GB Black Sim+Esim 153000 18 Pro Max 256GB Burgundye Esim 149000 18 Pro Max 256GB Burgundye Sim+Esi 18 Pro Max 512GB Black Sim+Esim 164000 18 Pro Max 512GB Burgundy Sim+Esim 174000 https://t.me/abusaxiyrus
β€103π₯32π12π―9π8β€βπ₯7π3π₯°3
Signed Abusaxiy_new
ABUSAXIY π’ pinned Β«ABU-SAXIY π± SAMSUNG π± SAMSUNG A16 4/128Gb 13.900β½ SAMSUNG A17 4/128Gb 14.900β½ SAMSUNG A17 6/128Gb 16.900β½ SAMSUNG A17 8/256Gb 19.900β½ SAMSUNG A26 6/128Gb 19.900β½ SAMSUNG A36 8/256Gb 25.900β½ SAMSUNG A56 8/128Gb 26.900β½ SAMSUNG A27 5G 6/128Gb 20.900β½β¦Β»
https://t.me/abusaxiyrus
β€47β€βπ₯4π4π―3π2π₯°2π«‘2π1
Signed Abusaxiy_new
Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @abusaxiyrus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@abusaxiyrus edited 14 posts after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βABUSAXIY π’β (@abusaxiyrus), 176,321 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abusaxiyrus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.