Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 19 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,208–3,243 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 00:01
3,213
+1
12 Sept 2026, 16:37
3,212
-6
8 Sept 2026, 21:39
3,218
-11
3 Sept 2026, 19:01
3,229
-5
31 Aug 2026, 10:05
3,234
-5
28 Aug 2026, 10:16
3,239
no change
28 Aug 2026, 05:45
3,239
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 21 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
269 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
108
40.1%
🔥
79
29.4%
🎉
21
7.81%
👍
19
7.06%
🥰
11
4.09%
👏
9
3.35%
🤩
9
3.35%
😱
7
2.60%
🤯
5
1.86%
🤔
1
0.372%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 269 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2024 to 21 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Today, 22nd April, I turn 27. I remember when I used to think 27 was such a serious age, but now I feel like I am just getting started.
Last year I did two things that I feel defined my year - I started making music and I went to Japan.
Music had always been something I’ve wanted to try - the OGs know how many Ed Sheeran covers I’ve posted over the years.
I’ve released a new song “Only With You” today, it’s about …
9 year ago today (2nd April 2017), I gave my JEE. I got AIR 1 and became the only person ever to score a perfect 360/360 score.
This day looked normal back then but it changed my life. I went from yet another high schooler to national news overnight.
The traditional corporate IIT route never appealed to me, and the popularity I enjoyed due to my rank helped me pursue so many different careers.
Over the years, I’ve…
My new song Summer '16 is now out everywhere. Click below to listen on Spotify:https://open.spotify.com/album/7eIgldPMYI7jjarnd8x4X8?si=w826JDKBSpedAPcJc73gfQ
My second single releases this week. Follow me on Spotify to be the first to listen: https://open.spotify.com/artist/5x8Ni6jIojAGrz9ATtRoxA?si=cED64j3AQZG7XAWao-YYlg
My first single “Mujh Sang” is out on all music platforms.
Spotify Link: https://open.spotify.com/track/5NvoTauQDt7soqe3yLxjkx?si=xh4pi8e3R8CzZSVxLSbYjg
Just got a new toy - a superbike! Kawasaki ZX4R, my first bike 😃
❤52🔥22👍11🥰5🤩4🎉3
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @acadboostofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Nishant Jindal [IITD] @realNishantJindal · 35,666 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 1 September 2026
Rittik Baheti IIT JEE🔥 @rittikbahetioriginal · 45,689 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kalpit Veerwal” (@acadboostofficial), 3,213 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/acadboostofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.